Literature DB >> 31173098

Defence gene expression and phloem quality contribute to mesophyll and phloem resistance to aphids in wild barley.

Daniel J Leybourne1,2,3, Tracy A Valentine3, Jean A H Robertson4, Estefania Pérez-Fernández4, Angela M Main4, Alison J Karley3, Jorunn I B Bos1,2.   

Abstract

Aphids, including the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi), are significant agricultural pests. The wild relative of barley, Hordeum spontaneum 5 (Hsp5), has been described to be partially resistant to R. padi, with this resistance proposed to involve higher thionin and lipoxygenase gene expression. However, the specificity of this resistance to aphids and its underlying mechanistic processes are unknown. In this study, we assessed the specificity of Hsp5 resistance to aphids and analysed differences in aphid probing and feeding behaviour on Hsp5 and a susceptible barley cultivar (Concerto). We found that partial resistance in Hsp5 to R. padi extends to two other aphid pests of grasses. Using the electrical penetration graph technique, we show that partial resistance is mediated by phloem- and mesophyll-based resistance factors that limit aphid phloem ingestion. To gain insight into plant traits responsible for partial resistance, we compared non-glandular trichome density, defence gene expression, and phloem composition of Hsp5 with those of the susceptible barley cultivar Concerto. We show that Hsp5 partial resistance involves elevated basal expression of thionin and phytohormone signalling genes, and a reduction in phloem quality. This study highlights plant traits that may contribute to broad-spectrum partial resistance to aphids in barley.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Hordeum spontaneumzzm321990 ; zzm321990 Rhopalosiphum padizzm321990 ; zzm321990 Sitobion avenaezzm321990 ; zzm321990 Utamphorophora humboldtizzm321990 ; Amino acid composition; defence gene expression; electrical penetration graph (EPG); partial resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173098     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Resources of Cereal Crops for Aphid Resistance.

Authors:  Evgeny E Radchenko; Renat A Abdullaev; Irina N Anisimova
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Probing behavior of the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis on susceptible and resistant maize hybrids.

Authors:  Pablo Carpane; María Inés Catalano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis of wild and domesticated wheat genotypes reveals differences in chemical and physical defense responses against aphids.

Authors:  Zhaniya S Batyrshina; Beery Yaakov; Reut Shavit; Anuradha Singh; Vered Tzin
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Transcriptomic and metabolomic changes triggered by Macrosiphum rosivorum in rose (Rosa longicuspis).

Authors:  Penghua Gao; Hao Zhang; Huijun Yan; Ningning Zhou; Bo Yan; Yuanlan Fan; Kaixue Tang; Xianqin Qiu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Screening and Evaluation for Antixenosis Resistance in Wheat Accessions and Varieties to Grain Aphid, Sitobion miscanthi (Takahashi) (Hemiptera: Aphididae).

Authors:  Kifle Gebreegziabiher Gebretsadik; Yong Zhang; Julian Chen
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.