| Literature DB >> 31171788 |
P A Butler1, L P Gaffney2,3, P Spagnoletti4, J Konki3, M Scheck4, J F Smith4, K Abrahams5, M Bowry6, J Cederkäll7, T Chupp8, G de Angelis9, H De Witte10, P E Garrett11, A Goldkuhle12, C Henrich13, A Illana9, K Johnston3, D T Joss2, J M Keatings4, N A Kelly4, M Komorowska14, T Kröll13, M Lozano3, B S Nara Singh4, D O'Donnell4, J Ojala15,16, R D Page2, L G Pedersen17, C Raison18, P Reiter12, J A Rodriguez3, D Rosiak12, S Rothe3, T M Shneidman19, B Siebeck12, M Seidlitz12, J Sinclair4, M Stryjczyk10, P Van Duppen10, S Vinals20, V Virtanen15,16, N Warr12, K Wrzosek-Lipska14, M Zielinska21.
Abstract
There is a large body of evidence that atomic nuclei can undergo octupole distortion and assume the shape of a pear. This phenomenon is important for measurements of electric-dipole moments of atoms, which would indicate CP violation and hence probe physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. Isotopes of both radon and radium have been identified as candidates for such measurements. Here, we observed the low-lying quantum states in 224Rn and 226Rn by accelerating beams of these radioactive nuclei. We show that radon isotopes undergo octupole vibrations but do not possess static pear-shapes in their ground states. We conclude that radon atoms provide less favourable conditions for the enhancement of a measurable atomic electric-dipole moment.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31171788 PMCID: PMC6554308 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10494-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Spectra of γ-rays. The γ-rays were emitted following the bombardment of 120Sn targets by 222Rn (black), 224Rn (blue) and 226Rn (red). The γ-rays were corrected for Doppler shift assuming that they are emitted from the scattered projectile. Random coincidences between Miniball and CD detectors have been subtracted. The transitions which give rise to the observed full-energy peaks are labelled by the spin and parity of the initial and final quantum states. The assignments of the transitions from the negative-parity states in 224,226Rn are tentative (see text)
Fig. 2Coincidence γ-ray spectra. The representative background-subtracted γ-ray spectra are in time-coincidence with different gating transitions. Here the observed peaks are labelled by the energy (in keV) of the transition. The gating transition is additionally labelled by the proposed spin and parity of the initial and final states
Fig. 3Level schemes. These partial level schemes for 222,224,226Rn show the excited states of interest. Arrows indicate γ-ray transitions. All energies are in keV. Firm placements of transitions in the scheme are from previous work[20] or have been made using γ- γ-coincidence relations; otherwise in brackets
Fig. 4Systematic behaviour of radon isotopes. a Systematics of the energies for different spins of low-lying positive-parity (black) and negative-parity states (red) in radon isotopes; b cartoon illustrating how the octupole phonon vector aligns with the rotation (R) vector (which is orthogonal to the rotating body’s symmetry axis) so that I = R + 3 and ; c difference in aligned spin for negative- and positive-parity states in 218-224Rn (re-analysed for 218-222Rn that have been presented earlier[23]). The dashed line at is the expected value for static-octupole deformation
Energies of levels and transitions in 224Rn and 226Rn
| 224Rn | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 135.6 (5) | 2+ | 135.6 (5) | 0+ |
| 357.6 (6) | 4+ | 222.0 (5) | 2+ |
| 641.4 (8) | 6+ | 283.8 (5) | 4+ |
| 650.6 (8) | (3−) | 515.0 (6) | 2+ |
| 790.8 (8) | (5−) | 433.2 (5) | 4+ |
| 969.2 (9) | 8+ | 327.8 (5) | 6+ |
| 1006.4 (10) | (7-) | 365.0 (5) | 6+ |
| 1277.2 (10) | (9-) | 308.0 (5) | 8+ |
| 1327.8 (10) | 10+ | 358.6 (5) | 8+ |
| 1706.8 (11) | (12+) | 379.1 (5) | 10+ |
The 1-σ errors are given, estimated from the statistical error and the uncertainty in the energy calibration and Doppler correction