J Kim1, S Male2, D Damania3, B S Jahromi4, R P Tummala2. 1. From the Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology (J.K., S.M., R.P.T.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota kimx3990@umn.edu. 2. From the Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology (J.K., S.M., R.P.T.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Department of Medicine (D.D.), State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery (B.S.J.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid near-occlusion is defined as severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery with partial or full collapse of the distal vessel wall. The major studies evaluating carotid revascularization excluded patients with carotid near-occlusion. Given the paucity of data in the literature, we attempted to evaluate the safety of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in carotid near-occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data base review was performed from January 2010 to December 2018 to identify patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for symptomatic ICA near-occlusion and had 1-month clinical and imaging follow-up with carotid sonography. The medical records and imaging studies of patients with ICA near-occlusion were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients met the criteria for ICA near-occlusion, of whom 39 were included in the study, given insufficient 1-month follow-up on 6 patients. Of the 39 patients, 25 underwent carotid endarterectomy and 14 underwent carotid artery stenting. All patients had technically successful immediate revascularization of the ICA. Most (33 of 39) had 1-year follow-up postoperatively. Patients with carotid artery stenting had 20% restenosis and 79% vessel maturation rates, while patients with carotid endarterectomy had 17.4% restenosis and 84% vessel maturation. There was no significant difference in periprocedural complication rates between the 2 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting shows similar outcomes in restenosis and vessel maturation rates compared with carotid endarterectomy for ICA near-occlusion. There were no major differences between the 2 treatments in clinical outcomes or periprocedural complications. Carotid artery stenting is a revascularization option for carotid near-occlusion if the patient is considered at high risk for carotid endarterectomy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid near-occlusion is defined as severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery with partial or full collapse of the distal vessel wall. The major studies evaluating carotid revascularization excluded patients with carotid near-occlusion. Given the paucity of data in the literature, we attempted to evaluate the safety of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in carotid near-occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data base review was performed from January 2010 to December 2018 to identify patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for symptomatic ICA near-occlusion and had 1-month clinical and imaging follow-up with carotid sonography. The medical records and imaging studies of patients with ICA near-occlusion were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients met the criteria for ICA near-occlusion, of whom 39 were included in the study, given insufficient 1-month follow-up on 6 patients. Of the 39 patients, 25 underwent carotid endarterectomy and 14 underwent carotid artery stenting. All patients had technically successful immediate revascularization of the ICA. Most (33 of 39) had 1-year follow-up postoperatively. Patients with carotid artery stenting had 20% restenosis and 79% vessel maturation rates, while patients with carotid endarterectomy had 17.4% restenosis and 84% vessel maturation. There was no significant difference in periprocedural complication rates between the 2 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting shows similar outcomes in restenosis and vessel maturation rates compared with carotid endarterectomy for ICA near-occlusion. There were no major differences between the 2 treatments in clinical outcomes or periprocedural complications. Carotid artery stenting is a revascularization option for carotid near-occlusion if the patient is considered at high risk for carotid endarterectomy.
Authors: Allan J Fox; Michael Eliasziw; Peter M Rothwell; Matthias H Schmidt; Charles P Warlow; Henry J M Barnett Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A González; A Gil-Peralta; A Mayol; J R Gonzalez-Marcos; F Moniche; M Aguilar; I Gutierrez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P M Rothwell; M Eliasziw; S A Gutnikov; A J Fox; D W Taylor; M R Mayberg; C P Warlow; H J M Barnett Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-01-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Garcia-Pastor; A Gil-Núñez; J M Ramirez-Moreno; N González-Nafría; J Tejada; F Moniche; J C Portilla-Cuenca; P Martínez-Sánchez; B Fuentes; M A Gamero-García; M A de Leciñana; J Masjuan; D C Verge; Y Aladro; V Parkhutik; A Lago; A M de Arce-Borda; M Usero-Ruiz; R Delgado-Mederos; A Pampliega; Á Ximenez-Carrillo; M Bártulos-Iglesias; E Castro-Reyes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.966