| Literature DB >> 31170468 |
Vladimir G Dedkov1, N 'Faly Magassouba2, Marina V Safonova3, Ekaterina V Naydenova4, Andrey A Ayginin5, Barre Soropogui2, Fode Kourouma2, Amara B Camara2, Jacob Camara2, Andrey A Kritzkiy4, Igor V Tuchkov4, Mikhail Yu Shchelkanov6, Victor V Maleev5.
Abstract
Lassa fever is a severe viral hemorrhagic illness caused by Lassa virus. Based on estimates, the number of LASV infections ranges from 300,000 to 500,000 cases in endemic areas with a fatality rate of 1%. Development of fast and sensitive tools for the control and prevention of Lassa virus infection as well as for clinical diagnostics of Lassa fever are crucial. Here we reported development and evaluation of a one-step quantitative RT-qPCR assay for the Lassa virus detection - LASV-Fl. This assay is suitable for the detection of lineages I-IV of Lassa virus. The limit of detection of the assay ranged from 103 copies/ml to 105 copies/ml and has 96.4% diagnostic sensitivity, whereas analytical and diagnostic specificities both were 100%. Serum, whole blood and tissue are suitable for use with the assay. The assay contains all the necessary components to perform the analysis, including an armored positive control (ARC+) and an armored internal control (IC). The study was done during the mission of specialized anti-epidemic team of the Russian Federation (SAET) in the Republic of Guinea in 2015-2018. Based on sequencing data, LASV-specific assay was developed using synthetic MS2-phage-based armored RNA particles, RNA from Lassa virus strain Josiah, and further, evaluated in field conditions using samples from patients and Mastomys natalensis rodents.Entities:
Keywords: Guinea; Lassa fever; Lassa virus; quantitative RT-PCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31170468 PMCID: PMC7113850 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014
Features of the primers and the probes used in the Lassa assay.
| Species | Primer/probe | Sequence (5’-3’) | Probe type | Product size | Gene target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LASV | LVLforw1 | AGAGCCAGCCTGATCCCAGA | TaqMan | 113 bp | L |
| LVL rev1 | CACAGATAGTGGTTGTTGCACTC | ||||
| LVLforw2 | AGCTCATCTAGTGCCAGATGC | ||||
| LVL rev2 | GCTGAGACAGTTGAGACACA | TaqMan | 130 bp | ||
| LVLprb1a | R6 G –AgTTCTgCAAgAgTTgCTggTTTgAgAAC – BHQ1 | ||||
| LVLprb1b | R6 G –CCgCAATTCTgCAAgAgCTgTTggTTTgCg–BHQ1 | ||||
| LVLprb1c | R6 G –AAgAgCTgCTggTTCgAAAACAAgggCtc– BHQ1 | TaqMan | 135 bp | ||
| IC-STI87-rec | STI-87f | N/A | TaqMan | 117 bp | Artificial |
| STI-87r | N/A | ||||
| STI-87-prb | Cy5-(X)25-BHQ2 |
The primers and probes were designed in accordance with the current guidelines, regarding TaqMan primers and probes for RT-PCR techniques The LASV-specific probes were covalently attached to the fluorescent reporter dye rhodamine 6 G and black hole quencher 1 at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively.
ARPs used for evaluation of the assay LOD.
| ID of ARP | Strain | Access no | Origin | Isolation date | Country | Lineage | LOD, copies/ml |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVL1 | ISTH-2358-NIG-2012 | KM821995 | 2012 | Nigeria | n/A | 103 | |
| LVL2 | LASV046-NIG-2009 | KM822009 | 2009 | Nigeria | n/A | 103 | |
| LVL3 | LASV274-NIG-2010 | KM822056 | 2010 | Nigeria | n/A | 103 | |
| LVL4 | LASV975-NIG-2009 | KM822075 | 2009 | Nigeria | n/A | 104 | |
| LVL5 | G3151-SLE-2013 | KM821893 | 2013 | Sierra-Leone | IV | 5*104 | |
| LVL6 | Josiah | JN650518 | 1976 | Sierra-Leone | IV | 103 | |
| LVL7 | G3148-SLE-2013 | KM821891 | 2013 | Sierra-Leone | IV | 105 | |
| LVL8 | LM765-SLE-2012 | KM822116 | 2012 | Sierra-Leone | IV | 104 |
Eight LASV sequences of a maximal number of mismatches in the targeting region of L gene were selected and generated for the production of ARPs. The LOD assessed using ARP dilutions was between 103 copies/ml and 105 copies/ml (depending on the ARP).
List of viral species used evaluation of the assay analytical specificity.
| N | Species | Acronym | Family | Genus | Type of nucleic acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zaire ebolavirus | EBOV | Ebolavirus | RNA | |
| 2 | Sudan ebolavirus | SUDV | Ebolavirus | RNA | |
| 3 | Marburg virus | MARV | Marburgvirus | RNA | |
| 4 | Tahyna virus | TAHV | Orthobunyavirus | RNA | |
| 5 | Batai virus | BATV | Orthobunyavirus | RNA | |
| 6 | Inkoo virus | INKV | Orthobunyavirus | RNA | |
| 7 | Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus | CCHFV | Orthonairovirus | RNA | |
| 8 | Dhori virus | DHOV | Thogotovirus | RNA | |
| 9 | Flu A/H1N3 | FLUAV(H1N3) | Influenzavirus A | RNA | |
| 10 | Flu A/H3N2 | FLUAV(H3N2) | Influenzavirus A | RNA | |
| 11 | Flu B | FLUBV | Influenzavirus B | RNA | |
| 12 | Yellow fever virus | YFV | Flavivirus | RNA | |
| 13 | West Nile virus | WNV | Flavivirus | RNA | |
| 14 | Zika virus | ZIKV | Flavivirus | RNA | |
| 15 | Tick borne encephalitis virus | TBEV | Flavivirus | RNA | |
| 16 | Sindbis virus | SNDBV | Alphavirus | RNA | |
| 17 | Chikungunya virus | CHIKV | Alphavirus | RNA | |
| 18 | Rubella virus | RUBV | Rubivirus | RNA | |
| 19 | Kemerovo virus, strain 21/10 | KEMV-21/10 | Orbivirus | RNA | |
| 20 | Tribec virus, strain Tr19 | TRBV-Tr19 | Orbivirus | RNA | |
| 21 | Human Rotavirus A | RVA | Rotavirus | RNA | |
| 22 | Enteric Cytopathic Human Orphan virus 11 | ECHO11 | Enterovirus | RNA | |
| 23 | Human immunodeficiency virus 1 | HIV-1 | Lentivirus | RNA | |
| 24 | Rabies virus | RABV | Lyssavirus | RNA | |
| 25 | Human Cytomegalovirus 5 | HCMV-5 | Cytomegalovirus | DNA | |
| 26 | Human parvovirus B19 | B19 | Erythroparvovirus | DNA | |
| 27 | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus | MERS | Betacoronavirus | RNA |
Potential cross-reactivity was assessed using the high-titer of viral RNA and DNA from 27 viral species belonging to 13 viral families, which are part of the collection of Central Research Institute for Epidemiology.
LOD assessment performed using LASV strain Josiah of known concentrations.
| Concentration, PFU/ml | Replicates | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ct | Ct | Ct | |
| 104 | 28,2 | 29.0 | 28.6 |
| 103 | 32.0 | 31.9 | 31.7 |
| 102 | 35.8 | 36.1 | 35.9 |
| 101 | 39.5 | 39.8 | 39.1 |
| 5 | 40.4 | N/D | N/D |
LOD was assessed using a series of 10-fold dilutions of LASV strain Josiah, which was provided by the Center of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector” as a part of their collection.
Fig. 1The assay LOD and assay standard curves assessed using ARPs.
Standard detection was linear ranging from 106 copies/ml to 5 × 102–102 copies/ml of the LASV ARPs (depending on the ARP). The LOD was set as the minimal dilution detected in three replicates.
List of samples from M. natalensis used for assessing diagnostic sensitivity of the assay.
| N | ID | Region | Sample type | Assessed by | Ct | Confirm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 39.1 | positive |
| 2 | 38 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 35.6 | positive |
| 3 | 39 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 33.4 | positive |
| 4 | 40 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 38.9 | positive |
| 5 | 44 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 36.4 | positive |
| 6 | 50 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 29.7 | positive |
| 7 | 81 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 33.3 | positive |
| 8 | 110 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 32.9 | positive |
| 9 | Pool2 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 35.9 | positive |
| 10 | 103 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | positive |
| 11 | 104 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 12 | 105 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 13 | 161 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 32.4 | positive |
| 14 | 163 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 15 | 173 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 16 | 174 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 38.0 | positive |
| 17 | 175 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 18 | 104dl | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 19 | 195 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 20 | 106 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 34.8 | positive |
| 21 | 108 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 22 | 109 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | positive |
| 23 | 111 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | negative | negative |
| 24 | 107 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 37.2 | positive |
| 25 | 99 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 25.4 | positive |
| 26 | 63 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 28.0 | positive |
| 27 | 65 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 37.2 | positive |
| 28 | 94 | Faranah | Whole blood | VLHV | 33.0 | positive |
| 29 | 11276 | Mamou | Tissue | CREMS | 22.6 | positive |
| 30 | 11102 | Mamou | Tissue | CREMS | 25.2 | positive |
| 31 | 11309 | Mamou | Tissue | CREMS | 24.6 | positive |
| 32 | 11092 | Mamou | Tissue | CREMS | 21.8 | positive |
| 33 | 11095 | Mamou | Tissue | CREMS | 24.7 | positive |
| 34 | 11087 | Faranah | Tissue | CREMS | 24.2 | positive |
| 35 | 11269 | Faranah | Tissue | CREMS | 27.4 | positive |
| 36 | 11098 | Faranah | Tissue | CREMS | 22.7 | positive |
| 37 | 12356 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 24.9 | positive |
| 38 | 13251 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 39 | 13252 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 25.0 | positive |
| 40 | 13253 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 26.3 | positive |
| 41 | 13254 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 42 | 13255 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 23.5 | positive |
| 43 | 13256 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 21.9 | positive |
| 44 | 13257 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 45 | 13258 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 25.1 | positive |
| 46 | 13259 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 47 | 13260 | Macenta | Tissue | CREMS | 25.7 | positive |
| 48 | 13261 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | 25.2 | positive |
| 49 | 13262 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 50 | 13263 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 51 | 13283 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 52 | 13284 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 53 | 13285 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | negative | negative |
| 54 | 13280 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | 26.5 | positive |
| 55 | 13286 | Nzerekore | Tissue | CREMS | 24.7 | positive |
The samples from M. natalensis were provided by the Virology Laboratory of Hemorrhagic Fevers Research Project of Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry Guinea and by the Centre de Recherché en Epidemiologie, Microbiologie et Soins Medicaux (CREMS) in Kindia, Guinea. All samples were previously tested for LASV using one-step RT-PCR assay targeting GP (Ehichioya et al., 2011).
List of samples from humans used for assessing diagnostic sensitivity of the assay.
| N | ID | Sex | Age | Region | Sample type | Day after onset | Ct | Confirm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2136 | F | 40 | Kankan | Serum | 4 | 28.3 | positive |
| 2 | 2137 | M | 60 | Kankan | Serum | 3 | 35.4 | positive |
| 3 | 2140 | M | 60 | Kankan | Serum | 5 | 31.8 | positive |
| 4 | 2143 | F | 42 | Kankan | Serum | 5 | 25.6 | positive |
| 5 | 2144 | F | 61 | Kankan | Serum | 4 | 33.0 | positive |
| 6 | 3334 | M | 56 | Nzerekore | Serum | 6 | neg | neg |
| 7 | 3335 | M | 36 | Nzerekore | Serum | 7 | neg | neg |
| 8 | 3336 | M | 36 | Nzerekore | Serum | 10 | 39.2 | positive |
| 9 | 3337 | F | 61 | Nzerekore | Serum | 4 | 34.2 | positive |
| 10 | 3338 | M | 40 | Nzerekore | Serum | 6 | neg | neg |
| 11 | 3339 | M | 55 | Nzerekore | Serum | 2 | 36.9 | positive |
| 12 | 3340 | M | 28 | Nzerekore | Serum | 5 | neg | neg |
| 13 | 3341 | M | 28 | Nzerekore | Serum | 6 | neg | neg |
| 14 | 3342 | F | 7 | Mamou | Serum | 4 | 28.3 | positive |
| 15 | 3343 | M | 60 | Mamou | Serum | 3 | 30.8 | positive |
| 16 | 3344 | M | 7 | Mamou | Serum | 5 | 27.6 | positive |
| 17 | 3345 | F | 7 | Mamou | Serum | 6 | 24.3 | positive |
| 18 | 3346 | M | 11 | Mamou | Serum | 7 | neg | neg |
| 19 | 3347 | M | 39 | Kindia | Serum | 8 | neg | neg |
| 20 | 3348 | M | 32 | Kindia | Serum | 4 | neg | neg |
| 21 | 3349 | M | 39 | Kindia | Serum | 3 | neg | neg |
| 22 | 3350 | F | 36 | Mamou | Serum | 7 | neg | neg |
| 23 | 3351 | F | 25 | Kankan | Serum | 10 | 38.9 | positive |
| 24 | 3352 | F | n/A | Kankan | Serum | 3 | neg | neg |
| 25 | 3358 | M | 18 | Faranah | Serum | 5 | 25.9 | positive |
| 26 | 3367 | M | 23 | Faranah | Serum | 4 | 36.4 | positive |
| 27 | 3369 | M | 43 | Faranah | Serum | 3 | 28.6 | positive |
| 28 | 3372 | M | 24 | Faranah | Serum | 5 | neg | neg |
| 29 | 3373 | M | 15 | Faranah | Serum | 3 | neg | neg |
| 30 | 3375 | M | 23 | Faranah | Serum | 5 | 27.9 | positive |
| 31 | 3378 | F | n/A | Faranah | Serum | 6 | 26.2 | positive |
| 32 | 3391 | M | n/A | Faranah | Serum | 8 | neg | neg |
| 33 | 3392 | M | n/A | Mamou | Serum | 6 | neg | neg |
| 34 | 3394 | F | 26 | Mamou | Serum | 9 | neg | neg |
| 35 | 3396 | F | 35 | Mamou | Serum | 11 | neg | neg |
| 36 | 3398 | M | 37 | Mamou | Serum | 4 | neg | neg |
| 37 | 3400 | M | 41 | Mamou | Serum | 5 | neg | neg |
The samples of humam serum were provided by the Centre de Recherché en Epidemiologie, Microbiologie et Soins Medicaux (CREMS) in Kindia, Guinea. All samples were previously tested for LASV using one-step RT-PCR assay targeting GP [Ehichioya et al., 2011].