Literature DB >> 31169958

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.

L J Salomon1, Z Alfirevic2, F Da Silva Costa3,4, R L Deter5, F Figueras6, T Ghi7, P Glanc8, A Khalil9,10, W Lee11, R Napolitano12, A Papageorghiou9,13, A Sotiriadis14, J Stirnemann15, A Toi16, G Yeo17.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION These Guidelines aim to describe appropriate assessment of fetal biometry and diagnosis of fetal growth disorders. These disorders consist mainly of fetal growth restriction (FGR), also referred to as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and often associated with small‐for‐gestational age (SGA), and large‐for‐gestational age (LGA), which may lead to fetal macrosomia; both have been associated with a variety of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Screening for, and adequate management of, fetal growth abnormalities are essential components of antenatal care, and fetal ultrasound plays a key role in assessment of these conditions. The fetal biometric parameters measured most commonly are biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur diaphysis length (FL). These biometric measurements can be used to estimate fetal weight (EFW) using various different formulae1. It is important to differentiate between the concept of fetal size at a given timepoint and fetal growth, the latter being a dynamic process, the assessment of which requires at least two ultrasound scans separated in time. Maternal history and symptoms, amniotic fluid assessment and Doppler velocimetry can provide additional information that may be used to identify fetuses at risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Accurate estimation of gestational age is a prerequisite for determining whether fetal size is appropriate‐for‐gestational age (AGA). Except for pregnancies arising from assisted reproductive technology, the date of conception cannot be determined precisely. Clinically, most pregnancies are dated by the last menstrual period, though this may sometimes be uncertain or unreliable. Therefore, dating pregnancies by early ultrasound examination at 8–14 weeks, based on measurement of the fetal crown–rump length (CRL), appears to be the most reliable method to establish gestational age. Once the CRL exceeds 84 mm, HC should be used for pregnancy dating2–4. HC, with or without FL, can be used for estimation of gestational age from the mid‐trimester if a first‐trimester scan is not available and the menstrual history is unreliable. When the expected delivery date has been established by an accurate early scan, subsequent scans should not be used to recalculate the gestational age1. Serial scans can be used to determine if interval growth has been normal. In these Guidelines, we assume that the gestational age is known and has been determined as described above, the pregnancy is singleton and the fetal anatomy is normal. Details of the grades of recommendation used in these Guidelines are given in Appendix 1. Reporting of levels of evidence is not applicable to these Guidelines.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31169958     DOI: 10.1002/uog.20272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  49 in total

1.  Gestational growth trajectories derived from a dynamic fetal-placental scaling law.

Authors:  Daniel Baller; Diana M Thomas; Kevin Cummiskey; Carl Bredlau; Nadav Schwartz; Kelly Orzechowski; Richard C Miller; Anthony Odibo; Ruchit Shah; Carolyn M Salafia
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Raanan Meyer; Amihai Rottenstreich; Michal Zamir; Hadas Ilan; Edward Ram; Menachem Alcalay; Gabriel Levin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 4.  IBD in pregnancy: recent advances, practical management.

Authors:  Christian P Selinger; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Aileen Fraser; Veronica Hall; Jimmy Limdi; Lyn Smith; Marie Smith; Reem Nasur; Melanie Gunn; Andrew King; Aarthi Mohan; Khasia Mulgabal; Alexandra Kent; Klaartje Bel Kok; Tracey Glanville
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-19

5.  Perinatal outcomes of two consecutive strategies for the management of fetal growth restriction: a before-after study.

Authors:  Sabrina Paola Demirdjian; Cesar Hernan Meller; Maria Celeste Berruet; Gonzalo Dosdoglirian; Adolfo Etchegaray
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  A comparison of four fetal biometry growth charts within an Australian obstetric population.

Authors:  Candice Dry; Michelle K Pedretti; Elizabeth Nathan; Jan E Dickinson
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Provision of care for pregnant women with IBD in the UK: the current landscape.

Authors:  Sarah Wolloff; Emma Moore; Tracey Glanville; Jimmy Limdi; Klaartje B Kok; Aileen Fraser; Alexandra Kent; Khasia Mulgabal; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Christian Selinger
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-26

8.  Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the second half of pregnancy on fetal growth and hemodynamics: A prospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rizzo; Ilenia Mappa; Pavjola Maqina; Victoria Bitsadze; Jamilya Khizroeva; Alexander Makatsarya; Francesco D'Antonio
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.544

9.  Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Harshita Mittal; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Sayan Das; Bruce Bedell; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Arup Dutta; Saikat Deb; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

10.  Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.

Authors:  Linda Lindström; Mårten Ageheim; Ove Axelsson; Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Alkistis Skalkidou; Anna-Karin Wikström; Eva Bergman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.