Literature DB >> 31169892

Prevalence of and Characteristics Associated With Self-reported Good Hearing in a Population With Elevated Audiometric Thresholds.

Steven A Curti1, Elliott N Taylor2, Dan Su2, Christopher Spankovich1.   

Abstract

Importance: Audiometric evidence of hearing loss does not always relate to self-reported hearing loss. Objective: To determine the prevalence of self-reported good hearing in a population with audiometrically defined hearing loss and identify associated factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: We analyzed audiometric data from adults aged 20 to 69 years from the 1999 to 2002 cycles of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional, nationally representative interview and examination survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population. Logistic regression was used to examine unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted relationships between demographic, hearing health, and general health factors related to self-perceived hearing status. Analysis was conducted between September 4, 2018, and November 30, 2018. Interventions: Audiometry and questionnaires. Main Outcomes and Measure: The prevalence of persons reporting good hearing among those with audiometrically defined hearing loss and the variables associated with this population.
Results: The mean (SD) age was 47.0 (0.4) years for hearing loss defined by any frequency >25 dB HL and 52.5 (1.1) years for hearing loss defined by PTA >25 dB HL. For the sample with hearing loss defined by any frequency >25 dB HL, 744 (56.1%) were men and 629 (43.9%) were women. For the sample with hearing loss defined by PTA >25 dB HL 251 (68.5%) were men and 114 (31.5%) were women. Of the 1373 participants who were found to have hearing loss (at least 1 individual frequency >25 dB HL in either ear) 993 (68.5%) reported good hearing. Younger age, nonwhite race, and women were all more likely to report good hearing. When the definition of hearing loss was made more stringent (pure-tone average >25 dB HL), 365 participants had audiometric hearing loss, but 174 (43%) continued to report good hearing. We observed that better self-perceived general health status (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.25-2.90) and higher dietary quality (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were significantly associated with increased self-report of good hearing, whereas tinnitus (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44), noise exposure (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.58), and several comorbid conditions were associated with decreased self-report of good hearing. Conclusions and Relevance: A significant proportion of the study population reported good hearing despite having audiometric evidence of hearing loss; the prevalence was related to how hearing loss was defined. The report of good hearing was significantly associated with demographics and general health status. The high prevalence of mild hearing loss and self-reported good hearing was associated with the low reported use of hearing aids.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31169892      PMCID: PMC6555479          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  20 in total

1.  National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Clifford L Johnson; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Vicki L Burt; Leyla K Mohadjer
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2014-03

2.  Cost as a Barrier for Hearing Aid Adoption.

Authors:  Michael Valente; Amyn M Amlani
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Declining Prevalence of Hearing Loss in US Adults Aged 20 to 69 Years.

Authors:  Howard J Hoffman; Robert A Dobie; Katalin G Losonczy; Christa L Themann; Gregory A Flamme
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Effects of hearing and cognitive impairment in sentence recognition.

Authors:  Mirtes Bruckmann; Maria Madalena Canina Pinheiro
Journal:  Codas       Date:  2016-08-04

5.  Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification.

Authors:  J G Clark
Journal:  ASHA       Date:  1981-07

6.  Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States.

Authors:  Adele M Goman; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Perceived hearing handicap of patients with unilateral or mild hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Newman; G P Jacobson; G A Hug; S A Sandridge
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Ginger A Gray
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; D E Morgan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Social representation of "hearing loss": cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK.

Authors:  Vinaya Manchaiah; Berth Danermark; Tayebeh Ahmadi; David Tomé; Fei Zhao; Qiang Li; Rajalakshmi Krishna; Per Germundsson
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hearing loss and cognitive decline among older adults with atrial fibrillation: the SAGE-AF study.

Authors:  Wei-Jia Wang; Darleen Lessard; Hawa Abu; David D McManus; Tanya Mailhot; Jerry H Gurwitz; Robert J Goldberg; Jane Saczynski
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Comparison of Self-reported Measures of Hearing With an Objective Audiometric Measure in Adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Authors:  Dialechti Tsimpida; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Darren Ashcroft; Maria Panagioti
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.