Literature DB >> 31169567

Management and outcomes of hepatorenal syndrome at an urban academic medical center: a retrospective study.

Muhammad H Bashir1, Sadat Iqbal, Regina Miller, Joie Singh, Ghassan Mubarak, Michelle Likhtshteyn, Elliot Bigajer, Bridget Gallagher, Abu Hurairah, Dimitre Stefanov, Samy I McFarlane, Richard Ferstenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to evaluate the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in our inner city, American hospital. We intended to ascertain whether or not there is prompt recognition of AKI in cirrhosis according to International Club of Ascites and acute kidney injury network criteria as well how effective we are at distinguishing among different causes of AKI. We aimed to calculated the mortality of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) in our hospital, and to evaluate the adequacy of the established treatment of AKI at each stage of its algorithm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICD diagnostic codes were used to identify patients with liver cirrhosis and acute renal failure. A total of 725 patients met the search criteria. We excluded the patients without clinical or imaging evidence of ascites, heart failure, on hemodialysis, baseline creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl and patients who died within 48 h of developing acute renal failure. 291 patients met the inclusion criteria. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 software with a two-sided significance level set at P value less than 0.05.
RESULTS: Mean age was 55.7 ± 0.61 and baseline serum creatinine was 0.94 ± 0.14. 66.5% of patients were African American, 27.3%, Hispanic, and 4.3% White. The average rise in creatinine from baseline was 1.36 ± 0.08 mg/dl. 27.2% of patients met the diagnostic criteria of HRS. 92.3% of patients with HRS received intravenous fluids and 75.4% received intravenous albumin within 48 h of acute creatinine rise. The in-hospital mortality rate was 14.1, 23.3, and 41.5% for patients with pre-renal azotemia, ARF, and HRS, respectively (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that with present tools, there is significantly higher mortality in HRS despite guideline-based treatment. Biomarkers for early diagnosis of HRS are necessary to avoid delays in initiation of HRS treatment while establishing the diagnosis. As well, worldwide standardization of the treatment of HRS will be important if the outcome is to be improved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31169567     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic Nomograms for Hospital Survival and Transplant-Free Survival of Patients with Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yi Song; Yu Wang; Chaoran Zang; Xiaoxi Yang; Zhenkun Li; Lina Wu; Kang Li
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Predictors of Development of Hepatorenal Syndrome in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Roula Sasso; Ahmad Abou Yassine; Liliane Deeb
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Hepatorenal syndrome in acute-on-chronic liver failure with acute kidney injury: more questions requiring discussion.

Authors:  Songtao Liu; Qinghua Meng; Yuan Xu; Jianxin Zhou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-09-25

4.  Development and validation of a prognostic model for patients with hepatorenal syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xin-Yu Sheng; Fei-Yan Lin; Jian Wu; Hong-Cui Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.