Literature DB >> 31169537

Clinician-Educator Tracks for Trainees in Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Karen Friedman1, Janice Lester, John Q Young.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinician-educator tracks (CETs) appear to be increasing in prevalence in graduate medical education (GME) and may play an important role in medical education workforce development. The authors conducted a scoping review to characterize the current state of knowledge about CETs' structure, content, and outcomes.
METHOD: Six databases were searched in January 2018 for English-language peer-reviewed articles published through 2017 to identify articles describing CETs in GME. To be included, the CET had to target GME learners (residents/fellows), be longitudinal, have the primary aim of developing trainees into clinician-educators (CEs), and address at least one CE core competency (direct teaching, curriculum development, mentorship/advising, leadership, assessment, educational scholarship). The authors extracted and analyzed data from included articles.
RESULTS: Of 1,434 articles identified, 19 were included in the review, representing 18 separate CETs. All but 2 CETs (11%) were specialty-specific. Most included a core curriculum with classroom-based sessions (18; 100%), workplace-based opportunities to practice skills (17; 94%), and a required scholarly project (16; 89%). Seventeen (94%) focused on skills related to direct teaching. Four (22%) identified mentoring/advising as a core curriculum focus. Five (28%) required project dissemination. Time spent in CETs varied widely (median: 166 hours; range: 8 hours/4-month period to 1,288 hours/2-year period). The most common reported outcomes were learner reactions (7; 39%) and career tracking (11; 61%).
CONCLUSIONS: This review yields a composite picture of the current state of CETs in GME. The results highlight the paucity of outcomes data and areas for potential standardization and future research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31169537     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

1.  What Do Stakeholders Want From Resident Conference Programming?

Authors:  Amanda S Xi; Breanne Jaqua; Wali Johnson; Kayley Swope; Joshua Belfer; Cdr Dink Jardine; Jeffrey J Dewey
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  How We Review a Medical Education Research Manuscript.

Authors:  Margaret M Hayes; Henry E Fessler
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 3.  Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren A Maggio; Kelsey Larsen; Aliki Thomas; Joseph A Costello; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  The pipeline starts in medical school: characterizing clinician-educator training programs for U.S. medical students.

Authors:  Ryan C Bahar; Aidan W O'Shea; Eric S Li; Madisen A Swallow; August A Allocco; Judy M Spak; Janet P Hafler
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.