Vanessa Rubesch-Kütemeyer1, Thomas Fischbach2, Denise Guckel2, Britta Körber2, Dieter Horstkotte2,3, Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben2, Georg Nölker2. 1. Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. akleemeyer@hdz-nrw.de. 2. Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. 3. Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The concern of higher radiation exposure during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) was raised before. Previously, we compared CBA plus intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to our former standard approach without ICE. A substantial reduction of radiation exposure without compromising safety or outcome was observed. We now investigate if at all and possibly to which amount radiation reduction can be achieved with growing experience. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed procedure time, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT) and contrast media (CM) use for all patients receiving CBA between 2013 and 2017 for AF. RESULTS: In 1131 procedures, procedure time decreased significantly between 2013 and 2017 (2013 111 ± 26 min, 2017 99 ± 25 min, p = 0.005). DAP halved between 2013 and 2014 without further significant decline (2013 1428 ± 1276 cGycm2, 2014 725 ± 551 cGycm2, p < 0.001). FT demonstrated a constant decrease from 2013 to 2017 (2013 11.7 ± 5.5 min, 2017 5.1 ± 3.5 min, p < 0.001). CM use did not show a significant reduction comparing 2013 to 2017 (2013 62 ± 19 ml, 2017 59 ± 18 ml, 2013/2017 p = 0.584). CONCLUSION: Given the imminent negative effects of radiation, every effort should be undertaken for its reduction. Feasible protocols can be kept simple by technical changes as reducing frame rates and basic radiation reduction strategies such as collimation, but ICE might add additional benefit. With growing experience and awareness of radioprotection, DAP and FT as low as or lower than in radiofrequency ablations seem possible.
PURPOSE: The concern of higher radiation exposure during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) was raised before. Previously, we compared CBA plus intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to our former standard approach without ICE. A substantial reduction of radiation exposure without compromising safety or outcome was observed. We now investigate if at all and possibly to which amount radiation reduction can be achieved with growing experience. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed procedure time, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT) and contrast media (CM) use for all patients receiving CBA between 2013 and 2017 for AF. RESULTS: In 1131 procedures, procedure time decreased significantly between 2013 and 2017 (2013 111 ± 26 min, 2017 99 ± 25 min, p = 0.005). DAP halved between 2013 and 2014 without further significant decline (2013 1428 ± 1276 cGycm2, 2014 725 ± 551 cGycm2, p < 0.001). FT demonstrated a constant decrease from 2013 to 2017 (2013 11.7 ± 5.5 min, 2017 5.1 ± 3.5 min, p < 0.001). CM use did not show a significant reduction comparing 2013 to 2017 (2013 62 ± 19 ml, 2017 59 ± 18 ml, 2013/2017 p = 0.584). CONCLUSION: Given the imminent negative effects of radiation, every effort should be undertaken for its reduction. Feasible protocols can be kept simple by technical changes as reducing frame rates and basic radiation reduction strategies such as collimation, but ICE might add additional benefit. With growing experience and awareness of radioprotection, DAP and FT as low as or lower than in radiofrequency ablations seem possible.
Authors: Christopher A B Kowalewski; Miguel Rodrigo; Chad Brodt; Francois Haddad; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 1.976