| Literature DB >> 31168399 |
William Stohl1, Ning Yu1, Samantha A Chalmers2, Chaim Putterman3, Chaim O Jacob1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: CTLA-4; animal model; checkpoint protein; lupus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31168399 PMCID: PMC6519407 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lupus Sci Med ISSN: 2053-8790
Figure 1CTLA-4 expression in Treg cells from NZM.Ctla4 / and NZM WT mice. (A) Spleen cells from littermate 2-month-old NZM.Ctla4 / and NZM.Ctla4 / female mice were stained for surface CD4, surface CD25, intracellular Foxp3 and intracellular CTLA-4. The cells were gated on the CD4+ population (left) and then on the CD25+Foxp3+ population (middle). CTLA-4 expression by the T regulatory (Treg) (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) cell population is shown on the right. CTLA-4 staining intensity is plotted on a logarithmic scale. Results from representative NZM.Ctla4 / and NZM.Ctla4 / mice are shown. (B) CTLA-4 tracings from another representative NZM.Ctla4 / mouse (red) and another representative NZM.Ctla4 / mouse (black) are superimposed to highlight the difference in staining intensities. (C) Composite results from five female NZM.Ctla4 / mice (red circles) and five female NZM.Ctla4 / mice (black circles) are plotted. Each circle represents an individual mouse.
Figure 2Lymphocyte and serological profiles of NZM WT and NZM.Ctla4 mice. (A) Spleen mononuclear cells, B (CD19+) cells, follicular B (CD3−CD19+IgMlo/−IgDhi) cells, plasma (CD3−CD19loCD138+) cells, CD4+ cells, CD4+ activated memory (CD4+CD44+CD62L−) cells, CD4+ recently activated (CD4+CD69+) cells and T regulatory (CD4+Foxp3+CD25+) cells from NZM.Ctla4 / (+/−; N=11) and NZM WT (+/+; N=9) mice aged 2–3 months are plotted. Results are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Lines outside the boxes represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Each circle represents an individual mouse. (B) Sera from NZM WT (N=7–18 mice per age; circles) or NZM.Ctla4 / mice (N=7–22 mice per age; diamonds) at the indicated ages were assayed for total IgG (left) and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies (right). Results are shown as medians, and the error bars indicate 25th and 75th percentiles. *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Ig, immunoglobulin; WT, wild type.
Figure 3Clinical disease and renal immunopathology in NZM wild-type (WT) mice and NZM.Ctla4 / mice. (A) NZM WT (NZM.Ctla4 / ) mice (N=29) and NZM.Ctla4 / mice (N=43) were monitored for survival. (B) Kidney sections from NZM.Ctla4 / and NZM.Ctla4 / +/− aged 5–7 months were stained for immunoglobulin (Ig)G immunofluorescence or C3 immunofluorescence or with H&E for histological evaluation. Representative sections are illustrated. Original magnifications: 100× for immunofluorescence; 200× for H&E.