Need for expertise in mitral valve regurgitation.

The mitral annulus is a three-dimensional, saddle-shaped structure exhibiting dynamic conformational changes during the cardiac cycle.1 The normal annulus contracts and increases in saddle-shaped non-planarity during systole.2 3 Such annular dynamics are important for the balanced distribution of the mechanical stresses imposed by the left ventricle (LV) on the mitral valve apparatus.4 5

Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is an anatomic abnormality of the mitral annulus described as a wide separation between the atrium–mitral valve junction and the LV attachment that is appreciable on both gross and histological examination. During reparative surgery for mitral valve prolapse (MVP), surgical evaluation can detect MAD as a superior displacement or atrialisation of the posterior leaflet base. Although MAD is found in a large proportion of patients with myxomatous MVP,6 it has also been described as an anatomic variation of mitral annulus morphology. MAD leads to paradoxical annular enlargement and flattening during systole, increasing leaflets and chordae stress, which may accelerate the degenerative process of mitral valve apparatus. It has been suggested that the mechanical traction of the papillary muscles and the posterolateral LV wall stretch can be arrhythmogenic. In addition, MAD elicits a sort of decoupling between annular and ventricular functions,6 7 which can increases LV wall stress, and ultimately leads to myocardial fibrosis and LV dysfunction (figure 1). However, such abnormal annular dynamics occurs generally despite relatively normal LV systolic function assessed by ejection fraction and often in the absence of severe mitral regurgitation.

Figure 1

Example of a young woman with a bileaflet prolapse and a mitral annular disjunction (MAD). Longitudinal strain demonstrates the impact of MAD on left ventricular function. (A–C) MAD (double green arrow) in parasternal and apical long axis views. There is an atrialisation of a part of the left ventricle in regard of the posterior leaflet insertion. The sudden and excessive displacement of leaflets toward the left atrium in systole elicits an abnormal tension and stretch of chordae and papillary muscles. Not only the secondary chordae but also the chordae that are directly attached to the basal segments of the left ventricle. (D) In 3D-echo, the posterior leaflet prolapses totally in the left atrium in systole. The prolapse is less marked for the anterior leaflet in this example. (E) Mitral annulus disjunction can induce abnormal longitudinal deformation of left ventricular basal segments, associated with cardiac MRI to inferolateral basal myocardial wall fibrosis. 3D, three-dimensional.

Recent but consistent publications incriminated MAD as a possible aetiology of sudden cardiac death (SD), especially but not only, in patients with myxomatous MVP. In addition to MAD, the classical pattern of SD in this setting associate bileaflet MVP in a young woman with biphasic or inverted T-waves in the inferior leads, and complex premature ventricular contractions (not related to exercise) on the 24 hours ECG recording. As MAD is a quite frequent finding by echocardiography or cardiac MRI, it is of paramount importance to distinguish MAD at risk for LV ventricular arrhythmias8 from MAD without increased risk. The work published in Open Heart,5 6 based on both cardiac MRI and fibrosis biomarkers, provides new insights into the stratification of ventricular arrhythmia risk in MAD.

Cardiac MRI has been used not only for LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) evaluation but also for MV apparatus assessment, MAD measurement and myocardial fibrosis evaluation by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) analysis. Papillary muscles or basal posterolateral wall fibrosis was described in association with MAD, MVP and SD. In addition, local or diffuse LV myocardial fibrosis study is an important issue for predicting LV dysfunction when regurgitation is severe.6 9 In addition to cardiac MRI, authors provided some evidence in favour of the use of fibrosis biomarkers measured on blood samples.10 Indeed, the manuscript published in the current issue of Open Heart suggests that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) could be combined to imaging data for best predicting the risk of arrhythmogenic events in patients with MAD. sST2 is an interleukin 1 receptor family member secreted by cardiac cells in circumstances of biomechanical stress that can promote myocardial fibrosis. In the present work, sST2 was enhanced in patients with MAD and ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.01) and improved the differentiation of patients with and without ventricular arrhythmia in conjunction with LV, EF and papillary muscles LGE.11

Although further studies are needed in a larger population to confirm these findings, the present study provides new insights and suggests that cardiac MR and biomarkers of fibrosis might be used in combination for improving the risk stratification of severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with MAD.