Literature DB >> 31168246

Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section and Its Influence on Intraoperative Management of Indeterminate Epithelial Ovarian Tumors.

Nyengidiki T Kennedy1, Ajit Sebastian2, Dhanya S Thomas2, Anitha Thomas2, Mayank Gupta3, Ramani Manoj Kumar3, Abraham Peedicayil2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section in detecting epithelial ovarian tumor histological types and its effect on management. A retrospective review was done of all patients who had an intraoperative frozen section for an indeterminate ovarian tumor over a six-year period. The reference standard was final histology. The validity indices for frozen section in diagnosing benign, borderline, and malignant lesions were determined. One hundred thirty-five intraoperative frozen section-diagnosed epithelial ovarian tumors were reviewed. The mean age was 44.9 ± 14.2 years, the median parity was 2, and 57% (77/135) of patients were post-menopausal. The commonest histological subtype was mucinous 48.1% (65/135) on frozen section and 46.7% (63/135) on final histology. The overall concordance rate of frozen section to final histology was 81.5% (ƙ = 0.719, p = 0.0001). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of frozen section to diagnose benign lesions were 86.7%, 85.7%, 97.2%, and 79.2% respectively. In borderline tumors, the diagnostic test characteristics were 88.1%, 81.2%, 90.3%, and 72.2%. For malignant lesions, these values were 88.1%, 77.8%, 95.1%, and 91.3% respectively. The odds ratios for frozen section being correct were 40.9 (95% CI 14.8-113.5) for benign lesions, 40.3 (95% CI 13.4-121.3) for borderline tumors, and 67.4 (95% CI 20.5-222.0) for malignancy. Over-treatment or under-treatment occurred in 19.3% of patients. Intraoperative frozen section is useful in situations where the nature of the ovarian tumor is uncertain. However, borderline ovarian tumors are more likely to be over-diagnosed. About a fifth of patients received inappropriate treatments based on the frozen section report.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic test; Frozen section; India; Ovarian neoplasm

Year:  2019        PMID: 31168246      PMCID: PMC6527664          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-00869-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  20 in total

1.  Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  G Zanetta; S Rota; S Chiari; C Bonazzi; G Bratina; C Mangioni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Pathology and classification of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Vivien W Chen; Bernardo Ruiz; Jeffrey L Killeen; Timothy R Coté; Xiao Cheng Wu; Catherine N Correa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Colin J R Stewart; Barbara A Brennan; Ian G Hammond; Yee C Leung; Anthony J McCartney
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Chel Hun Choi; Ha-Jeong Kim; Min Kyu Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Accuracy of intra-operative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Arikan Ilker; Barut Aykut; Harma Muge; Harma Mehmet Ibrahim; Ozmen Bayar Ulku; Gezer Sener; Sun Suna
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.781

6.  Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of ovarian mucinous tumors.

Authors:  Tip Pongsuvareeyakul; Surapan Khunamornpong; Jongkolnee Settakorn; Kornkanok Sukpan; Prapaporn Suprasert; Sumalee Siriaunkgul
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Diagnostic efficacy of tumor markers, sonography, and intraoperative frozen section for ovarian tumors.

Authors:  F Wakahara; F Kikkawa; A Nawa; K Tamakoshi; K Ino; O Maeda; M Kawai; S Mizutani
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Fariba Yarandi; Z Eftekhar; Narges Izadi-Mood; Hadi Shojaei
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.100

9.  Clinical analysis of intra-operative frozen section proven borderline tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  Jin Hwi Kim; Tae Jung Kim; Yong Gyu Park; Sung Ha Lee; Chung Won Lee; Min Jong Song; Keun Ho Lee; Soo Young Hur; Seog Nyeon Bae; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms: experience at a tertiary oncology center.

Authors:  Amita Maheshwari; Sudeep Gupta; Shubhada Kane; Yogesh Kulkarni; Bhupesh Kumar Goyal; Hemant B Tongaonkar
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  1 in total

1.  Guiding significance of intraoperative frozen section for range of judging incisal edge of Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fei He; Chen Wang; Weichao Liu; Gongning Shi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.