Literature DB >> 31168176

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRIMEAN-CONGO HEMORRHAGIC FEVER AND CLIMATE: DOES CLIMATE AFFECT THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS?

Fazilet Duygu1, Tugba Sari1, Turan Kaya1, Oznur Tavsan1, Murat Naci1.   

Abstract

- Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne viral zoonosis. The incidence of zoonotic diseases has been shown to be affected by climatic factors. In this study, we evaluated patients endemic to the CCHF region and examined the relationship between the number of patients and climatic properties of the region where they lived. The study included 548 CCHF patients. Along with the patient demographic and clinical characteristics, we recorded temperature, humidity and precipitation in the places where they lived at the time of their admission to the hospital. In addition to temperature, humidity and precipitation at the time of patient admission, these values were assessed at one month and three months prior to admission. The relationship between the number of patients and the above-mentioned values was examined. Humidity at the time of and one month prior to hospital admission, and precipitation three months prior to hospital admission were found to affect the number of patients admitted to the hospital for CCHF. In conclusion, climate appeared to affect the number of CCHF patients. We believe that the number of patients presenting to the hospital with CCHF could be predicted by taking into account climatic properties of the places where CCHF has been recorded, along with undertaking necessary measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate; Hemorrhagic fever, Crimean-Congo; Ticks; Zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31168176      PMCID: PMC6536269          DOI: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Croat        ISSN: 0353-9466            Impact factor:   0.780


Introduction

The Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne viral zoonotic infectious disease characterized by fever and bleeding, with a potentially fatal outcome. The infectious agent is a single-stranded lipid enveloped RNA virus that belongs to the Bunyaviridae family of the genus Nairovirus. The disease can infect people when the virus is passed into the circulatory system as a result of a bite by ticks of the genus Hyalomma. In addition, transmission may occur as a result of contact with blood or body fluids of the infected hosts (, ). CCHF has been recorded in 52 countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East (). The CCHF symptoms are characterized by a short incubation period followed by a sudden onset of high fever, chills, headache and abdominal pain. In addition, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, neuropsychiatric and cardiac changes may occur. Hemorrhagic signs ranging from petechiae to large ecchymosis may be observed (). The CCHF is typically observed from April to September, mostly in the Central Anatolian region of Turkey, in the cities of Tokat, Sivas and Yozgat. The climate of this region is moderate rainy and cold during the winters, and hot and dry during the summers, and these conditions are optimal for the survival of the Hyalomma type ticks (, ). This study was conducted in the city of Tokat, which is the region with the highest incidence of CCHF in Turkey (). In this study, we evaluated 548 patients who were followed during the 2007-2011 period in the Tokat region. We assessed the relationship of the disease with climatic changes, as well as the relationship between the number of patients and temperature, humidity and precipitation.

Patients and Methods

The patients admitted to the Tokat State Hospital during the 2007-2011 period were hospitalized with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with CCHF. Patient sera were sent to the National Reference Laboratory. A total of 548 patients who were CCHF PCR and/or IgM antibody positive were diagnosed with CCHF and were included in the study. The patient admission date, place of residence and clinical characteristics were recorded. Temperature, humidity, and precipitation measured by meteorological stations in the Tokat region in the years 2007-2011 were obtained from the General Directorate of Meteorology of Turkey. Meteorological data from the patient residence were collected on the date of hospital admission, as well as one month and three months before hospital admission.

Statistical analyses

Categorical variables were defined as percentages and counts, and were analyzed by χ2-test. The normality of distribution of continuous variables was determined by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparison of continuous variables between two groups was done by two independent sample t-tests or Mann Whitney U test. The mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (Q1-Q3) were used to report continuous variables. The Poisson regression method was used to examine the factors influencing the number of patients. The relationship between the number of patients with the previous year’s temperature, humidity and precipitation was analyzed by the logistic regression analysis.

Results

We investigated the effects of the following variables on the number of patients: year, month, humidity, humidity 1 (humidity at the patient residence one month before hospital admission), humidity 3 (humidity three months before hospital admission), temperature, temperature 1 (temperature at the patient residence one month before hospital admission), temperature 3 (temperature three months before hospital admission), precipitation, precipitation 1 (precipitation at the patient residence one month before hospital admission), and precipitation 3 (precipitation three months before hospital admission). We evaluated the relationship between the number of patients and temperature at the time of their admission to the hospital. The number of patients was statistically significantly higher in 2008 versus 2007 (p=0.000) and in 2009 versus 2007 (p=0.014). Considering the relationship between the number of patients and temperature one month before hospital admission, the number of patients was statistically significantly higher in 2009 as compared with 2008 (p=0.043). Evaluation of the relationship between the number of patients and temperature three months before hospital admission showed the number of patients to be statistically significantly higher in 2010 versus 2007 and in 2008 versus 2010 (p=0.000 both). Considering the relationship between the number of patients and humidity three months before hospital admission, the number of patients was statistically significantly higher in 2009 versus 2010 and in 2011 versus 2010 (p<0.05 both) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Relationship between the number of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever patients and humidity.

Relationship between the number of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever patients and humidity. We evaluated the relationship between the number of patients and precipitation at the time of their admission to the hospital. The number of patients was statistically significantly higher in 2009 as compared with 2008 and in 2011 as compared with 2010 (p<0.05 both). The analysis showed that the humidity levels at the time of patient admission (p=0.000) (Fig. 1) and one month prior to admission (p=0.005) (Fig. 1), as well as precipitation three months prior to patient admission influenced the number of patients developing CCHF (p=0.000) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Relationship between the number of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever patients and level of precipitation three months prior to hospital admission.

Relationship between the number of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever patients and level of precipitation three months prior to hospital admission. Yearly temperature, humidity and precipitation are shown in Table 1. There was no relationship between the number of patients and previous year’s levels of temperature, humidity and precipitation.
Table 1

Number of patients, temperature, humidity and level of precipitation according to years

    Year    2007    2008    2009    2010    2011    p
    Patients (N)    59    105    133    95    160    0.000
    Temperature (°C)    21.7    (20.3±24.1)    19.6    (15.2±23.1)    21.4    (15.6±21.6)    19.65    (18.0±22.3)    19.5    (18.8±24.2)    0.668*
    Temperature 1 (°C)    20.3    (9.4±21.7)    15.2    (14.8±19.6)    11.2    (15.6±15.8)    17.3    (12.1±18)    15.5    (14.6±19.5)    0.852f
    Temperature 3 (°C)    7.9    (2.9±9.4)    11.9    (0.0±14.6)    7    (6.6±7)    8.6    (8.6±9)    6.7    (6.7±10.9)    0.677h
    Humidity (%)    50.9    (50.9±53.5)    55.8    (55.7±57.5)    52.2    (52.2±62.3)    60.9    (59.1±62.4)    59.5    (54±61.8)    0.000e
    Humidity 1 (%)    54    (50.9±54.7)    56.7    (55.7±57.6)    62.3    (52.2±62.3)    62.4    (59.1±63.3)    62.2    (59.5±63)    0.005e
    Humidity 3 (%)    61.5    (58.5±64.1)    57.6    (57.05±68.3)    65.2    (60.1±65.2)    64.3    (63.4±65)    63.2    (63.0±63.8)    0.833t
    Precipitation (mm)    31.7    (0.2±33.8)    34.2    (6.65±53.7)    45.5    (20.0±60.1)    45.3    (45.3±59.8)    59.1    (37.9±76.4)    0.142£
    Precipitation 1 (mm)    33.8    (31.7±43.2)    51.6    (34.2±52.65)    60.1    (45.5±60.1)    59.8    (45.3±64.6)    73.5    (59.1±76.4)    0.264 e
    Precipitation 3 (mm)    39.6    (20.4±43.2)    43.5    (38.8±47.55)    82.4    (68.3±82.4)    58.8    (54.1±64.6)    69.5    (59.1±73.5)    0.000e

*Statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2008 (p=0.000), and between 2007 and 2009 (p=0.014). There was no statistically significant difference among other groups; f statistically significant difference between 2008 and 2009 (p=0.043); hstatistically significant difference between 2007 and 2010, and between 2008 and 2010 (p=0.000 both); estatistically significant difference among all groups (p=0.000); tno statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2008, 2008 and 2009. There was a statistically significant difference among other groups (p<0.05); £no statistically significant difference between 2009 and 2010. There was a statistically significant difference among other groups (p<0.05).

*Statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2008 (p=0.000), and between 2007 and 2009 (p=0.014). There was no statistically significant difference among other groups; f statistically significant difference between 2008 and 2009 (p=0.043); hstatistically significant difference between 2007 and 2010, and between 2008 and 2010 (p=0.000 both); estatistically significant difference among all groups (p=0.000); tno statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2008, 2008 and 2009. There was a statistically significant difference among other groups (p<0.05); £no statistically significant difference between 2009 and 2010. There was a statistically significant difference among other groups (p<0.05).

Discussion

This was the first study to examine the relationship between climate and the incidence of CCHF. We found climate to have an effect on the occurrence of CCHF. Elevated levels of humidity at the time of patient admission to the hospital and one month prior to that time point, along with the increased precipitation three months prior to hospital admission were shown to escalate the incidence of CCHF. The CCHF is a zoonotic viral disease that is initiated by the tick-borne Nairovirus virus. The Hyalomma tick is the vector responsible for viral transmission of the disease and has a wide distribution, which correlates with the global distribution of CCHF. The disease is usually asymptomatic in animals, but can cause death in 5%-30% of humans (). After the incubation period of 3-7 days, CCHF shows the following symptoms: high fever, myalgia, nausea, vomiting, headache, abdominal pain and diarrhea. In addition, hypotension, relative bradycardia, tachypnea, conjunctivitis, pharyngitis and cutaneous flushing or rash can occur. The disease is observed from April to September and peaks in June and July (). In this study, it was shown that CCHF emerged during the period from March to October. Climatic factors have an important role in the incidence of vector-borne diseases. The incidence of Lyme disease has been also shown to be affected by climatic changes (). The CCHF is most commonly observed in the Central Anatolian region in Turkey (Tokat, Sivas, Yozgat, and the surrounding area), where the summers are hot and dry and winters are cold and moderately rainy. This climate is suitable for optimal survival of Hyalomma genus ticks (). This study was conducted in Tokat, where CCHF is observed endemically in Turkey. In the areas where CCHF is endemic, an increase in temperature compared to 10 years before has been reported; especially in the month of April, the increase was greater than 5 °C. It is known that temperature changes influence the tick abundance and length of life. Therefore, we thought that temperature could have an effect on the recent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with CCHF (, ). It has been reported that climatic changes in Turkey affect the migration patterns of birds and that migratory birds may have a role in the spread of CCHF (). A change in the population of migratory birds and animals, as well as the structure of the land affect the tick population. Climatic and environmental changes play a role in the diffusion of the virus in Turkey, but complex and different multifactorial reasons may also be involved in the viral diffusion process (, ). However, climate emerges as the most important factor when considering all the possible affects. There have been many studies on the relationship between climatic changes and increase in the incidence of certain infectious diseases (-). Climatic conditions have been suggested to affect the population of ticks and therefore tick-borne diseases (, ). However, there has not been a study examining the impact of climate change on CCHF. In this study, we evaluated not just the general regional data, but also the specific meteorological data from patient areas of residence. We observed the relationship between climate and the number of CCHF patients. The increase in the number of CCHF patients was observed in Tokat and its surroundings, and this study showed that climate might be a reason for the increased number of these patients. Zhang et al. report on a relationship between temperature and precipitation and the incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (). It has also been reported that climatic changes affected dispersion of Phlebotomus spp., as well as dispersion of P. mascittii and Leishmania infantum vector, which causes leishmaniasis (). One study showed that humidity levels from previous two years were associated with the incidence of Lyme disease. It was suggested that dry and hot air could kill nymph eggs and that two years after a dry summer there would be a decrease in the number of ticks (). On the other hand, two different studies showed that one and two years after a rainy summer, there was an increase in the number of ticks (, ). In another study related to Lyme disease, it is reported that temperature in the winter season from the same year did not affect the incidence of Lyme disease. Nevertheless, the incidence was found to be increased in relation to the previous year’s winter temperature. It was not specified whether this increase in the disease incidence was due to an increase in the population of ticks or increase in the number of rodents (). The 2 oC increase in winter temperature in the New England region has been reported to increase the survival chances of Peromyscus leucopus species, thus increasing the incidence of Lyme disease in that region (). Warm winters and humid springs have been reported to increase the incidence of Lyme disease two years later (). Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an increasing burden for healthcare systems in many Arctic countries (-). Heat and humidity have great importance in the life cycle of Ixodes ticks. Climatic changes were shown to alter the habitat of Ixodes ticks, which carry TBE vectors (). These studies investigated the effects of climate on ticks that play a role in dispersion of different diseases. In our study, we investigated the effect of climate on the incidence of CCHF patients.

Conclusion

We found that the levels of humidity in the month of emergence of the disease and one month prior to that time point, along with precipitation three months before increased the number of patients diagnosed with CCHF. Based on these results, we suggest that the number of CCHF patients be predicted by considering climate in the regions where CCHF is observed, so that necessary measures can be taken.
  2 in total

1.  Seroepidemiology of Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever among cattle in Cameroon: Implications from a One Health perspective.

Authors:  Lina González Gordon; Paul R Bessell; Egbe F Nkongho; Victor N Ngwa; Vincent N Tanya; Melissa Sander; Lucy Ndip; Kenton L Morgan; Ian G Handel; Stella Mazeri; Barend MdeC Bronsvoort; Robert F Kelly
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-03-21

2.  Evaluation of seroprevalence and clinical and laboratory findings of patients admitted to health institutions in Gümüşhane with suspicion of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

Authors:  Esra Gürbüz; Abdurrahman Ekici; Ahmet Hakan Ünlü; Hasan Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.