Literature DB >> 31168090

Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei.

Martin Falk1, Yana Feodorova2,3, Natalia Naumova4,5, Maxim Imakaev1, Bryan R Lajoie4,6, Heinrich Leonhardt3, Boris Joffe3, Job Dekker4, Geoffrey Fudenberg7,8, Irina Solovei9, Leonid A Mirny10.   

Abstract

The nucleus of mammalian cells displays a distinct spatial segregation of active euchromatic and inactive heterochromatic regions of the genome1,2. In conventional nuclei, microscopy shows that euchromatin is localized in the nuclear interior and heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery1,2. Genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) analyses show this segregation as a plaid pattern of contact enrichment within euchromatin and heterochromatin compartments3, and depletion between them. Many mechanisms for the formation of compartments have been proposed, such as attraction of heterochromatin to the nuclear lamina2,4, preferential attraction of similar chromatin to each other1,4-12, higher levels of chromatin mobility in active chromatin13-15 and transcription-related clustering of euchromatin16,17. However, these hypotheses have remained inconclusive, owing to the difficulty of disentangling intra-chromatin and chromatin-lamina interactions in conventional nuclei18. The marked reorganization of interphase chromosomes in the inverted nuclei of rods in nocturnal mammals19,20 provides an opportunity to elucidate the mechanisms that underlie spatial compartmentalization. Here we combine Hi-C analysis of inverted rod nuclei with microscopy and polymer simulations. We find that attractions between heterochromatic regions are crucial for establishing both compartmentalization and the concentric shells of pericentromeric heterochromatin, facultative heterochromatin and euchromatin in the inverted nucleus. When interactions between heterochromatin and the lamina are added, the same model recreates the conventional nuclear organization. In addition, our models allow us to rule out mechanisms of compartmentalization that involve strong euchromatin interactions. Together, our experiments and modelling suggest that attractions between heterochromatic regions are essential for the phase separation of the active and inactive genome in inverted and conventional nuclei, whereas interactions of the chromatin with the lamina are necessary to build the conventional architecture from these segregated phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31168090      PMCID: PMC7206897          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1275-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  149 in total

Review 1.  Viewing Nuclear Architecture through the Eyes of Nocturnal Mammals.

Authors:  Yana Feodorova; Martin Falk; Leonid A Mirny; Irina Solovei
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 2.  Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods.

Authors:  Ivana Jerkovic; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  The self-stirred genome: large-scale chromatin dynamics, its biophysical origins and implications.

Authors:  Alexandra Zidovska
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  Data-Driven Polymer Model for Mechanistic Exploration of Diploid Genome Organization.

Authors:  Yifeng Qi; Alejandro Reyes; Sarah E Johnstone; Martin J Aryee; Bradley E Bernstein; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Physical modeling of the heritability and maintenance of epigenetic modifications.

Authors:  Sarah H Sandholtz; Quinn MacPherson; Andrew J Spakowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pericentromere clustering in Tradescantia section Rhoeo involves self-associations of AT- and GC-rich heterochromatin fractions, is developmentally regulated, and increases during differentiation.

Authors:  Hieronim Golczyk; Arleta Limanówka; Anna Uchman-Książek
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Lamina-Dependent Stretching and Unconventional Chromosome Compartments in Early C. elegans Embryos.

Authors:  Ahilya N Sawh; Maxwell E R Shafer; Jun-Han Su; Xiaowei Zhuang; Siyuan Wang; Susan E Mango
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  The liquid nucleome - phase transitions in the nucleus at a glance.

Authors:  Amy R Strom; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Rod nuclear architecture determines contrast transmission of the retina and behavioral sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  Kaushikaram Subramanian; Martin Weigert; Oliver Borsch; Heike Petzold; Alfonso Garcia-Ulloa; Eugene W Myers; Marius Ader; Irina Solovei; Moritz Kreysing
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment.

Authors:  Celeste D Rosencrance; Haneen N Ammouri; Qi Yu; Tiffany Ge; Emily J Rendleman; Stacy A Marshall; Kyle P Eagen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.