Literature DB >> 31167901

US young adults' perceived effectiveness of draft pictorial e-cigarette warning labels.

Jennah Sontag1, Michelle T Bover Manderski1, David Hammond2, Olivia A Wackowski3.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Research shows that pictorial warning labels for cigarettes are more effective than text-only warnings, and preliminary work suggests that pictorial warnings could also be considered for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). Pictorial warnings may be important for maximising their effectiveness among young people and enhancing the salience of the single nicotine addiction warning required for e-cigarettes to date in the USA. This study collected pilot data about the perceived effectiveness of draft e-cigarette pictorial warnings.
METHODS: Participants were 876 young adults (ages 18-29) recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk who completed an online e-cigarette survey in 2018. Participants viewed and ranked five versions of the same e-cigarette nicotine addiction warning message-four pictorial and one text-only-on their perceived noticeability, likelihood of capturing young people's attention, memorability, relevance to the addiction warning text and overall effectiveness in warning people about e-cigarette risks. For each outcome, presentation of the five warning versions was randomised. Pictorials included symbolic images of risk and addiction, and of priority audiences for the warning (ie, young people).
RESULTS: For all outcomes, pictorial warnings were ranked higher than the text-only warning, and the warning using a yellow triangle caution icon was ranked highest for all outcomes. The text-only warning was ranked as the least likely to be effective for all four outcomes in which it was assessed. Trends were similar for current e-cigarette users and non-users.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research should assess perceptions and the appropriateness of pictorial imagery for e-cigarette warnings and test their efficacy against text-only warnings experimentally. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; harm reduction; packaging and labeling; public policy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31167901      PMCID: PMC6717039          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  3 in total

1.  Young adults' cigarillo risk perceptions, attention to warning labels and perceptions of proposed pictorial warnings: a focus group study.

Authors:  Stefanie K Gratale; Michelle Jeong; Anupreet Sidhu; Zeinab Safi; Andrew A Strasser; Cristine D Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Experts' Perceptions of and Suggestions for Cigar Warning Label Messages and Pictorials.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle Jeong; Kevin R J Schroth; Mariam Rashid; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  The Effect of Graphic Health Warning Labels Placed on the ENDS Device on Young Adult Users' Experience, Exposure and Intention to Use: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Wei Li; Mayra Vargas-Rivera; Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan; Ziyad Ben Taleb; Taghrid Asfar; Olatokunbo Osibogun; Seth M Noar; Wasim Maziak
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2021-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.