| Literature DB >> 31167405 |
Abstract
Global design and manufacturing of the materials with superb properties remain one of the greatest challenges on the market. The future progress is orientated towards researches into the material development for the production of composites of better mechanical properties to the existing materials. In the field of advanced composites, epoxy molding compounds (EMCs) have attained dominance among the common materials due to their excellent properties that can be altered by adding different fillers. One of the main fillers is often based on silicon dioxide (SiO2). The concept of this study was to evaluate the effects of the selected silica-based fillers on the thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of EMCs. Various types of fillers with SiO2, including crystalline silica and fused silica, were experimentally studied to clarify the impact of filler on final product. Fillers with different shape (scanning electron microscope, SEM), along with different specific surface area (specific surface area analyzer, BET method) and different chemical structure, were tested to explore their modifications on the EMCs. The influence of the fillers on the compound materials was determined with the spiral flow length (spiral flow test, EMMI), glass transition temperature (differential scanning calorimetry, DSC), and the viscosity (Torque Rheometer) of the composites.Entities:
Keywords: epoxy molding compound; fillers; flow spiral length; silicon dioxide; tensile strength
Year: 2019 PMID: 31167405 PMCID: PMC6601043 DOI: 10.3390/ma12111811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Weight content of silicon dioxide, bulk density and specific surface area of the tested fillers.
| Filler Mark | Type of Filler | Weight Content of SiO2, | Bulk Density, | Specific Surface Area, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Glass beads | 68.00–75.00 | 1.36 | 0.38 |
| F2 | Foundry sand | 15.32–21.60 | 1.83 | 0.11 |
| F3 | Crystalline Silica | ≈99.70 | 1.06 | 0.86 |
| F4 | Fused Silica | ≈99.70 | 0.60 | 4.94 |
Figure 1Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the tested types of fillers: (a) glass beads; (b) foundry sand; (c) crystalline silica; and, (d) fused silica.
Figure 2Stages for the preparation of epoxy molding compound.
Temperature results of DSC thermogrames for prepared EMCs.
| Epoxy Molding Compound | Filler Mark | Tg, °C | Tcuring peak, °C | Tdecomposition, °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMC 1 | F1 | 113.8 | 170.4 | 221.0 |
| EMC 2 | F2 | 113.0 | 174.1 | 218.9 |
| EMC 3 | F3 | 113.8 | 174.1 | 217.8 |
| EMC 4 | F4 | 114.7 | 171.6 | 214.0 |
Evaluations of torque rheometer plastograms for each EMC granulate.
| Epoxy Molding Compound | Filler Mark | Torque Minimum, | Residence Time, | Reaction Time, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMC 1 | F1 | 1.2 | 87 | 154 |
| EMC 2 | F2 | 0.9 | 99 | 162 |
| EMC 3 | F3 | 1.0 | 109 | 191 |
| EMC 4 | F4 | 1.0 | 122 | 202 |
Dimensional measurement of EMCs final test products for after molding and post curing process.
| After Molding Process | Post Curing Process | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy Molding Compound | Filler Mark | Outer Diameter, cm | Inner Diameter, cm | Height, cm | Outer Diameter, cm | Inner Diameter, cm | Height, cm |
| EMC 1 | F1 | 19.93 | 12.033 | 14.99 | 19.93 | 12.036 | 14.99 |
| EMC 2 | F2 | 19.92 | 12.050 | 14.98 | 19.92 | 12.045 | 14.99 |
| EMC 3 | F3 | 19.92 | 12.044 | 14.97 | 19.92 | 12.046 | 14.98 |
| EMC 4 | F4 | 19.92 | 12.038 | 14.98 | 19.93 | 12.042 | 14.98 |
Physical and mechanical properties of tested EMCs granulates and final test products.
| Epoxy Molding Compound | Filler Mark | EMMI, | Density AM, | Density PC, | Tensile Strength, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMC 1 | F1 | 19.6 ± 1.2 | 1.904 | 1.894 | 1910 ± 130 |
| EMC 2 | F2 | 23.9 ± 0.4 | 1.967 | 1.958 | 1850 ± 120 |
| EMC 3 | F3 | 21.1 ± 0.6 | 1.934 | 1.924 | 1990 ± 240 |
| EMC 4 | F4 | 24.4 ± 0.7 | 1.876 | 1.864 | 1680 ± 200 |
Figure 3(a) Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) thermogrames of prepared epoxy molding compounds (EMC) granulates before molding process; (b) DSC thermogrames of prepared EMC products after molding process; and, (c) DSC curves thermogrames of prepared EMC products after post curing process.
Figure 4Flow-curing behaviors of prepared EMC granulates.