Literature DB >> 31167197

Activity and Safety of Standard and Prolonged Capecitabine/Temozolomide Administration in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Eleftherios Chatzellis1,2, Anna Angelousi3, Kosmas Daskalakis3,4, Marina Tsoli3, Krystallenia I Alexandraki3, Ewa Wachuła5, Amichay Meirovitz6, Ofra Maimon6, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg7, David Gross7, Beata Kos-Kudła8, Anna Koumarianou9, Gregory Kaltsas3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and temozolomide combination (CAPTEM) is associated with high response rates in patients with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). We evaluated the real-world activity and safety of CAPTEM from 3 NEN centers.
METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with CAPTEM for bulky or progressive disease (PD) were retrospectively analyzed. -
Results: Seventy-nine patients with gastroenteropancreatic (grades 1-2 [n = 38], grade 3 [n = 24]) and lung/thymic (n = 17) NENs were included. Median treatment duration was 12.1 months (range 0.6-55.6). Overall, partial responses (PRs) occurred in 23 (29.1%), stable (SD) in 24 (30.4%), and PD in 28 (35.4%) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.1 (6-14.2) and 102.9 months (43.3-162.5), respectively. On univariate analysis, NENs naive to chemotherapy and low Ki67 were associated with favorable responses (partial response [PR] + SD; p = 0.011 and 0.045), PFS (p < 0.0001 and 0.002) and OS (p = 0.005 and 0.001). Primary site (pancreas and lung/thymus) was also a significant prognostic factor for PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, gastrointestinal and unknown primary NENs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, p = 0.009 and p = 0.018) and prior surgery (HR 2.4, 95% CI 11-4.9, p = 0.021) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Ki-67 was a poor predictor for favorable response in receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve 0.678). Safety analysis of CAPTEM indicated rare events of serious (grades 3-4) toxicities (n = 4) and low discontinuation rates (n = 8) even in patients with prolonged administration (>12 months).
CONCLUSIONS: CAPTEM treatment can be an effective and safe treatment even after prolonged administration for patients with NENs of various sites and Ki67 labeling index, associated with significant favorable responses and PFS.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capecitabine; Capecitabine and temozolomide combination; Neuroendocrine neoplasms; Neuroendocrine tumors; TEMCAP; Temozolomide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31167197     DOI: 10.1159/000500135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  16 in total

1.  Temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: an Italian multicenter real-world analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Spada; Patrick Maisonneuve; Caterina Fumagalli; Riccardo Marconcini; Fabio Gelsomino; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Davide Campana; Ivana Puliafito; Giulio Rossi; Pinuccia Faviana; Luca Messerini; Massimo Barberis; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Survival According to Therapy Regimen for Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Christine Koch; Cornelia Bambey; Natalie Filmann; Marc Stanke; Oliver Waidmann; Gabriele Husmann; Joerg Bojunga
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Workup of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Joseph S Dillon
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 4.  Immunotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a 2021 update.

Authors:  Christo Kole; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Michail Vailas; Maria Tolia; Maria Sotiropoulou; Sergios Tsakatikas; Nikolaos-Iasonas Kouris; Marina Tsoli; Anna Koumarianou; Michalis V Karamouzis; Dimitrios Schizas
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 5.  Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Authors:  Paula Espinosa-Olarte; Anna La Salvia; Maria C Riesco-Martinez; Beatriz Anton-Pascual; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 6.  Rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report of a rare entity and perspective review of promising agents.

Authors:  Gabriela Antelo; Cinta Hierro; Juan Pablo Fernández; Eduardo Baena; Cristina Bugés; Laura Layos; José Luis Manzano; Mónica Caro; Ricard Mesia
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 7.  Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Patients with Advanced GEP NENS: Present and Future Directions.

Authors:  Maria I Del Olmo-García; Stefan Prado-Wohlwend; Pilar Bello; Angel Segura; Juan F Merino-Torres
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of the Breast Presenting as a Liver Metastasis: A Rare Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Muhammad Masab; Alexander Gross; Melina Flanagan; Richard Goldberg; Midhun Malla
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-08-03

9.  Temozolomide in Grade 3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.

Authors:  David L Chan; Emily K Bergsland; Jennifer A Chan; Rujuta Gadgil; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Kathleen Hornbacker; Virginia Kelly; Pamela L Kunz; Patrick W McGarrah; Nitya P Raj; Diane L Reidy; Alia Thawer; Julia Whitman; Linda Wu; Christoph Becker; Simron Singh
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-21

Review 10.  How I treat neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Barbara Kiesewetter; Markus Raderer
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.