Mass drug administration with azithromycin reduced childhood mortality in MORDOR I and II in
Niger, although antibiotic resistance remains a major concern.[1-3] MORDOR I was a
trial that did not itself include morbidity assessments.1 However, 30 communities in Niger
were randomly selected from the same pool as the mortality trial, and randomly assigned to
either azithromycin or placebo distributed biannually to pre-school children as in MORDOR I
(see protocol and SAP at nejm.org for full study details). The mean (±SD) placebo and
azithromycin coverage over the four twice-yearly distributions was 82 ± 6% and 79
± 8%, respectively. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of California San
Francisco Committee for Human Research and the Ethical Committee of the Niger Ministry of
Health. We obtained oral consents from guardians prior to treatment and swab collection. No
incentives were offered. All analyses were at the community level.Here, we compare the proportion of macrolide-resistant pneumococcus in pre-school children
between azithromycin and placebo-treated communities, using broth dilution assays on
pneumococcus isolated from nasopharyngeal swabs collected at 24 months (approximately 6 months
after the fourth biannual treatment). Pneumococcus isolation and resistance testing were
performed according to standard protocols at ARUP, a CLIA-certified reference laboratory,
using breakpoints as documented in the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines
(see Supplementary Appendix). For this study, intermediate and resistant cases were considered
as resistant. Because the gut is a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes, we also
evaluated the resistome from rectal samples at 24 months using metagenomic DNA sequencing and
compared the non-host sequences against a curated antibiotic resistance database.[4,5]At 24 months, the proportion of macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal S.
pneumoniae at the community level was higher in the azithromycin-treated
communities (mean 12.3%, 95% confidence interval 5.7—20.0%) than in the placebo-treated
communities (2.9%, 0—6.1%, p=0.02, see Table 1 and Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix). Similarly, macrolide
resistance determinants in the gut were more prevalent in the azithromycin-treated communities
(68.1%, 60.4—74.8% vs 46.3%, 35.9—52.9%; p <0.001). We
next evaluated whether mass oral azithromycin administration was associated with an increase
in resistance to other antibiotics. The proportion of isolated pneumococcus resistant to
penicillin was similar between treatment arms: 18.7%, (8.2%—30.6%) in the azithromycin
group versus 22.3% (10.2%—37.8%) in the placebo group (p=0.72). As
with the nasopharyngeal samples, we found no evidence of a difference between arms for the
rectal samples in the non-macrolide classes (Table 1
and Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix).
Table 1
Nasopharyngeal pneumococcal and gut antibiotic resistance of pre-school children at 24
months.
Antibiotic
Mean Proportion, % (95% Confidence
Interval)Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance
(phenotypic)
Placebo
Azithromycin
Erythromycin
2.9 (0 to 6.1)
12.3 (5.7 to 20.0)
Clindamycin
1.7 (0 to 4.3)
9.0 (4.3 to 14.1)
Penicillin
22.3 (10.2 to 37.8)
18.7 (8.2 to 30.6)
TMP-SMX
77.1 (65.4 to 88.1)
84.7 (76.4 to 92.4)
Doxycycline
50.1 (33.7 to 66.0)
60.1 (50.8 to 70.5)
Linezolid
0 (0 to 2.3)
0 (0 to 2.3)
Ceftriaxone
0 (0 to 2.3)
0 (0 to 2.3)
Vancomycin
0 (0 to 2.3)
0 (0 to 2.3)
Levofloxacin
0 (0 to 2.3)
0 (0 to 2.3)
Meropenem
0 (0 to 2.3)
0 (0 to 2.3)
Antibiotic
Mean Prevalence, % (95% Confidence
Interval)Genetic resistance determinants in stool
Placebo
Azithromycin
Macrolides
46.3 (35.9 to 52.9)
68.1 (60.4 to 74.8)
Aminocoumarins
5.5 (2.9 to 8.6)
9.2 (5.2 to 13.1)
Aminoglycosides
30.9 (25.2 to 37.8)
37.6 (30.4 to 45.3)
Bacitracin
17.5 (10.8 to 26.1)
17.7 (12.8 to 25.9)
β-lactam
64.0 (57.5 to 72.9)
67.6 (59.7 to 74.5)
Cationic
33.2 (25.5 to 41.8)
35.2 (29.3 to 42.0)
Elfamycins
47.0 (39.4 to 54.0)
48.0 (36.0 to 54.7)
Fluoroquinolones
28.3 (20.9 to 36.7)
27.4 (20.2 to 35.2)
Fosfomycin
0 (0 to 2.3)
0.6 (0 to 1.8)
Glycopeptides
1.2 (0 to 3.0)
1.3 (0 to 3.2)
Metronidazole
21.9 (15.5 to 28.5)
31.8 (21.7 to 41.3)
Multi-drug-resistance
44.9 (36.6 to 54.4)
43.6 (37.9 to 50.3)
Phenicol
4.4 (1.9 to 8.0)
5.6 (1.9 to 13.9)
Rifampin
13.8 (9.2 to 19.5)
16.8 (10.8 to 24.7)
Sulfonamide
23.2 (17.0 to 30.4)
16.7 (9.9 to 26.8)
Tetracycline
74.0 (68.5 to 79.6)
75.4 (68.7 to 81.0)
Trimethoprim
49.5 (40.2 to 58.2)
50.8 (43.1 to 59.1)
Nasopharyngeal pneumococcal and gut antibiotic resistance of pre-school children at 24
months.In conclusion, targeted biannual mass oral azithromycin to pre-school children in Niger
increases resistance to macrolides (and related clindamycin resistance), but we found no
evidence of increased resistance to other classes of antibiotics at 2 years. This is
consistent with results from trachoma programs, which typically distribute annually in ages 6
months through adults. The longer-term effects of prolonged mass azithromycin distributions to
pre-school children remain to be determined.[3] Any policy for implementation of mass antibiotic administration should be
coupled with careful monitoring for antibiotic resistance.Trial Registration. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02047981Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Steven M Lakin; Chris Dean; Noelle R Noyes; Adam Dettenwanger; Anne Spencer Ross; Enrique Doster; Pablo Rovira; Zaid Abdo; Kenneth L Jones; Jaime Ruiz; Keith E Belk; Paul S Morley; Christina Boucher Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Thuy Doan; Armin Hinterwirth; Ahmed M Arzika; Sun Y Cotter; Kathryn J Ray; Kieran S O'Brien; Lina Zhong; Eric D Chow; Zhaoxia Zhou; Susie L Cummings; Dionna Fry; Catherine E Oldenburg; Lee Worden; Travis C Porco; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Kieran S O'Brien; Paul Emerson; P J Hooper; Arthur L Reingold; Elena G Dennis; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman; Catherine E Oldenburg Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Jeremy D Keenan; Robin L Bailey; Sheila K West; Ahmed M Arzika; John Hart; Jerusha Weaver; Khumbo Kalua; Zakayo Mrango; Kathryn J Ray; Catherine Cook; Elodie Lebas; Kieran S O'Brien; Paul M Emerson; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thuy Doan; Teshome Gebre; Berhan Ayele; Mulat Zerihun; Armin Hinterwirth; Lina Zhong; Cindi Chen; Kevin Ruder; Zhaoxia Zhou; Paul M Emerson; Travis C Porco; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Cornea Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 3.152
Authors: Rebecca L Brander; Marcia R Weaver; Patricia B Pavlinac; Grace C John-Stewart; Stephen E Hawes; Judd L Walson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rebecca A Gladstone; Ebrima Bojang; John Hart; Emma M Harding-Esch; David Mabey; Ansumana Sillah; Robin L Bailey; Sarah E Burr; Anna Roca; Stephen D Bentley; Martin J Holland Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Thuy Doan; Lee Worden; Armin Hinterwirth; Ahmed M Arzika; Ramatou Maliki; Amza Abdou; Lina Zhong; Cindi Chen; Catherine Cook; Elodie Lebas; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Eric D Chow; Travis C Porco; Marc Lipsitch; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 91.245