Literature DB >> 31167051

Intensive Glucose Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - 15-Year Follow-up.

Peter D Reaven1, Nicholas V Emanuele1, Wyndy L Wiitala1, Gideon D Bahn1, Domenic J Reda1, Madeline McCarren1, William C Duckworth1, Rodney A Hayward1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that a median of 5.6 years of intensive as compared with standard glucose lowering in 1791 military veterans with type 2 diabetes resulted in a risk of major cardiovascular events that was significantly lower (by 17%) after a total of 10 years of combined intervention and observational follow-up. We now report the full 15-year follow-up.
METHODS: We observationally followed enrolled participants (complete cohort) after the conclusion of the original clinical trial by using central databases to identify cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and deaths. Participants were asked whether they would be willing to provide additional data by means of surveys and chart reviews (survey cohort). The prespecified primary outcome was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, new or worsening congestive heart failure, amputation for ischemic gangrene, and death from cardiovascular causes. Death from any cause was a prespecified secondary outcome.
RESULTS: There were 1655 participants in the complete cohort and 1391 in the survey cohort. During the trial (which originally enrolled 1791 participants), the separation of the glycated hemoglobin curves between the intensive-therapy group (892 participants) and the standard-therapy group (899 participants) averaged 1.5 percentage points, and this difference declined to 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points by 3 years after the trial ended. Over a period of 15 years of follow-up (active treatment plus post-trial observation), the risks of major cardiovascular events or death were not lower in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio for primary outcome, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.06; P = 0.23; hazard ratio for death, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.18). The risk of major cardiovascular disease outcomes was reduced, however, during an extended interval of separation of the glycated hemoglobin curves (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99), but this benefit did not continue after equalization of the glycated hemoglobin levels (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.75).
CONCLUSIONS: Participants with type 2 diabetes who had been randomly assigned to intensive glucose control for 5.6 years had a lower risk of cardiovascular events than those who received standard therapy only during the prolonged period in which the glycated hemoglobin curves were separated. There was no evidence of a legacy effect or a mortality benefit with intensive glucose control. (Funded by the VA Cooperative Studies Program; VADT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032487.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31167051      PMCID: PMC6706253          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  49 in total

1.  Metabolic Stress and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus: The Role of Protein O-GlcNAc Modification.

Authors:  Yabing Chen; Xinyang Zhao; Hui Wu
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Predicting 5- and 10-Year Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Kevin N Griffith; Julia C Prentice; David C Mohr; Paul R Conlin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Lack of Glycemic Legacy Effects in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  Kasia J Lipska; Neda Laiteerapong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Review of the veteran affairs diabetes trial: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Kelvin Tran; Peter Reaven
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Management of Diabetes in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher M Mulla; Harris M Baloch; Samar Hafida
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Genetics Insights in the Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Mark O Goodarzi; Jerome I Rotter
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Markers of cholesterol synthesis are elevated in adolescents and young adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ivana Semova; Amy E Levenson; Joanna Krawczyk; Kevin Bullock; Kathryn A Williams; R Paul Wadwa; Philip R Khoury; Thomas R Kimball; Elaine M Urbina; Sarah D de Ferranti; David M Maahs; Lawrence M Dolan; Amy S Shah; Clary B Clish; Sudha B Biddinger
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 8.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: an Update.

Authors:  Rajaa Almourani; Bhavana Chinnakotla; Richa Patel; L Romayne Kurukulasuriya; James Sowers
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Association of Social and Behavioral Risk Factors With Mortality Among US Veterans With COVID-19.

Authors:  J Daniel Kelly; Dawn M Bravata; Stephen Bent; Charlie M Wray; Samuel J Leonard; W John Boscardin; Laura J Myers; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 10.  Prognostic value of arterial stiffness measurements in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and its complications: The potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Patoulias; Christodoulos Papadopoulos; Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Ioanna Zografou; Michael Doumas; Asterios Karagiannis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.