Literature DB >> 31166679

Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.

Seock-Ah Im1, Yen-Shen Lu1, Aditya Bardia1, Nadia Harbeck1, Marco Colleoni1, Fabio Franke1, Louis Chow1, Joohyuk Sohn1, Keun-Seok Lee1, Saul Campos-Gomez1, Rafael Villanueva-Vazquez1, Kyung-Hae Jung1, Arunava Chakravartty1, Gareth Hughes1, Ioannis Gounaris1, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc1, Tetiana Taran1, Sara Hurvitz1, Debu Tripathy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An earlier analysis of this phase 3 trial showed that the addition of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor to endocrine therapy provided a greater benefit with regard to progression-free survival than endocrine therapy alone in premenopausal or perimenopausal patients with advanced hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Here we report the results of a protocol-specified interim analysis of the key secondary end point of overall survival.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive either ribociclib or placebo in addition to endocrine therapy (goserelin and either a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen). Overall survival was evaluated with the use of a stratified log-rank test and summarized with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. There were 83 deaths among 335 patients (24.8%) in the ribociclib group and 109 deaths among 337 patients (32.3%) in the placebo group. The addition of ribociclib to endocrine therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than endocrine therapy alone. The estimated overall survival at 42 months was 70.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5 to 76.0) in the ribociclib group and 46.0% (95% CI, 32.0 to 58.9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.00973 by log-rank test). The survival benefit seen in the subgroup of 495 patients who received an aromatase inhibitor was consistent with that in the overall intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.98). The percentage of patients who received subsequent antineoplastic therapy was balanced between the groups (68.9% in the ribociclib group and 73.2% in the placebo group). The time from randomization to disease progression during receipt of second-line therapy or to death was also longer in the ribociclib group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed significantly longer overall survival with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy than with endocrine therapy alone among patients with advanced hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. No new concerns regarding toxic effects emerged with longer follow-up. (Funded by Novartis; MONALEESA-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02278120.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31166679     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  197 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for Early Prediction and Timely Recognition of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The Case of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Willingness of women with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer to take adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Authors:  N J Lipton; J Jesin; E Warner; X Cao; A Kiss; D Desautels; K J Jerzak
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Selective CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Biologic Outcomes, Determinants of Sensitivity, Mechanisms of Resistance, Combinatorial Approaches, and Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Erik S Knudsen; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-05

4.  Setting the Pick: Can PI3K Inhibitors Circumvent CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance?

Authors:  Amy S Clark; Igor Makhlin; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  CDK4/6 Dependence of Cyclin D1-Driven Parathyroid Neoplasia in Transgenic Mice.

Authors:  Jessica Costa-Guda; Kristin Corrado; Justin Bellizzi; Robert Romano; Elizabeth Saria; Kirsten Saucier; Madison Rose; Samip Shah; Cynthia Alander; Sanjay Mallya; Andrew Arnold
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 6.  Advances in Endocrine-Based Therapies for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vassilis Aggelis; Stephen R D Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Overall Survival of CDK4/6-Inhibitor-Based Treatments in Clinically Relevant Subgroups of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Schettini; Fabiola Giudici; Mario Giuliano; Massimo Cristofanilli; Grazia Arpino; Lucia Del Mastro; Fabio Puglisi; Sabino De Placido; Ida Paris; Pietro De Placido; Sergio Venturini; Michelino De Laurentis; PierFranco Conte; Dejan Juric; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Lajos Pusztai; Aleix Prat; Guy Jerusalem; Angelo Di Leo; Daniele Generali
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sudpreeda Chainitikun; James P Long; Ruben Rodriguez-Bautista; Toshiaki Iwase; Debu Tripathy; Takeo Fujii; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Capivasertib, an AKT Kinase Inhibitor, as Monotherapy or in Combination with Fulvestrant in Patients with AKT1 E17K-Mutant, ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lillian M Smyth; Kenji Tamura; Mafalda Oliveira; Eva M Ciruelos; Ingrid A Mayer; Marie-Paule Sablin; Laura Biganzoli; Helen J Ambrose; Jack Ashton; Alan Barnicle; Des D Cashell; Claire Corcoran; Elza C de Bruin; Andrew Foxley; Joana Hauser; Justin P O Lindemann; Rhiannon Maudsley; Robert McEwen; Michele Moschetta; Martin Pass; Vicky Rowlands; Gaia Schiavon; Udai Banerji; Maurizio Scaltriti; Barry S Taylor; Sarat Chandarlapaty; José Baselga; David M Hyman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacques Raphael; Cory Lefebvre; Alison Allan; Joelle Helou; Gabriel Boldt; Theodore Vandenberg; Phillip S Blanchette
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.