Importance: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a lipid-based endogenous signaling system. Its relevance to psychosis is through the association between cannabis use and the onset and course of illness and through the antipsychotic properties of cannabidiol, a potential ECS enhancer. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures of the ECS in psychotic disorders. Data Sources: Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception through June 13, 2018. The articles identified were reviewed, as were citations to previous publications and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Study Selection: Original articles were included that reported blood or CSF measures of ECS activity in patients with psychotic illnesses and in healthy controls. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA guidelines, independent extraction by multiple observers, and random-effects meta-analysis were used. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 index. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical relevance of ECS modifications in psychotic disorders was investigated by (1) a quantitative synthesis of the differences in blood and CSF markers of the ECS between patients and healthy controls, and (2) a qualitative synthesis of the association of these markers with symptom severity, stage of illness, and response to treatment. Results: A total of 18 studies were included. Three individual meta-analyses were performed to identify the differences in ECS markers between people with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Five studies, including 226 patients and 385 controls, reported significantly higher concentrations of anandamide in the CSF of patients than controls (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.26; P < .001; I2 = 54.8%). In 9 studies, with 344 patients and 411 controls, significantly higher anandamide levels in blood were found in patients, compared with controls (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.05-1.04; P = .03; I2 = 89.6%). In 3 studies, involving 88 patients and 179 controls, a significantly higher expression of type 1 cannabinoid receptors on peripheral immune cells was reported in patients compared with controls (SMD, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P < .001; I2 = 0%). Higher ECS tone was found at an early stage of illness in individuals who were antipsychotic naïve or free, and it had an inverse association with symptom severity and was normalized after successful treatment. Moderate to high level of heterogeneity in methods was found between studies. Conclusions and Relevance: Testing clinically relevant markers of the ECS in the blood and CSF of people with psychotic illness appears possible, and these markers provide useful biomarkers for the psychotic disorder; however, not all studies accounted for important variables, such as cannabis use. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018099863.
Importance: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a lipid-based endogenous signaling system. Its relevance to psychosis is through the association between cannabis use and the onset and course of illness and through the antipsychotic properties of cannabidiol, a potential ECS enhancer. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures of the ECS in psychotic disorders. Data Sources: Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception through June 13, 2018. The articles identified were reviewed, as were citations to previous publications and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Study Selection: Original articles were included that reported blood or CSF measures of ECS activity in patients with psychotic illnesses and in healthy controls. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA guidelines, independent extraction by multiple observers, and random-effects meta-analysis were used. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 index. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical relevance of ECS modifications in psychotic disorders was investigated by (1) a quantitative synthesis of the differences in blood and CSF markers of the ECS between patients and healthy controls, and (2) a qualitative synthesis of the association of these markers with symptom severity, stage of illness, and response to treatment. Results: A total of 18 studies were included. Three individual meta-analyses were performed to identify the differences in ECS markers between people with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Five studies, including 226 patients and 385 controls, reported significantly higher concentrations of anandamide in the CSF of patients than controls (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.26; P < .001; I2 = 54.8%). In 9 studies, with 344 patients and 411 controls, significantly higher anandamide levels in blood were found in patients, compared with controls (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.05-1.04; P = .03; I2 = 89.6%). In 3 studies, involving 88 patients and 179 controls, a significantly higher expression of type 1 cannabinoid receptors on peripheral immune cells was reported in patients compared with controls (SMD, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P < .001; I2 = 0%). Higher ECS tone was found at an early stage of illness in individuals who were antipsychotic naïve or free, and it had an inverse association with symptom severity and was normalized after successful treatment. Moderate to high level of heterogeneity in methods was found between studies. Conclusions and Relevance: Testing clinically relevant markers of the ECS in the blood and CSF of people with psychotic illness appears possible, and these markers provide useful biomarkers for the psychotic disorder; however, not all studies accounted for important variables, such as cannabis use. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018099863.
Authors: Dagmar Koethe; Franziska Pahlisch; Martin Hellmich; Cathrin Rohleder; Juliane K Mueller; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; E Fuller Torrey; Daniele Piomelli; F Markus Leweke Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Salvina Maria de Campos-Carli; Marcio Sobreira Araújo; Amanda Cardoso de Oliveira Silveira; Vitor Bortolo de Rezende; Natalia Pessoa Rocha; Rodrigo Ferretjans; Rafael Ribeiro-Santos; Andrea Teixeira-Carvalho; Olindo Assis Martins-Filho; Michael Berk; João Vinícius Salgado; Antonio Lucio Teixeira Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-12-03 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Claudio D'Addario; Vincenzo Micale; Martina Di Bartolomeo; Tibor Stark; Mariangela Pucci; Alexandra Sulcova; Mariacarlotta Palazzo; Zuzana Babinska; Laura Cremaschi; Filippo Drago; A Carlo Altamura; Mauro Maccarrone; Bernardo Dell'Osso Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Andrea Giuffrida; F Markus Leweke; Christoph W Gerth; Daniela Schreiber; Dagmar Koethe; Johannes Faulhaber; Joachim Klosterkötter; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Douglas L Boggs; Toral Surti; Aarti Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Mark Niciu; Brian Pittman; Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin; Halle Thurnauer; Andrew Davies; Deepak C D'Souza; Mohini Ranganathan Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Stefan Leucht; Inge Winter-van Rossum; Stephan Heres; Celso Arango; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Birte Glenthøj; Marion Leboyer; F Markus Leweke; Shôn Lewis; Phillip McGuire; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Dan Rujescu; Shitij Kapur; René S Kahn; Iris E Sommer Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jeremy J Watts; Elisa Guma; Sofia Chavez; Rachel F Tyndale; Ruth A Ross; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson; Mallar Chakravarty; Pablo M Rusjan; Romina Mizrahi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Daniela Navarro; Ani Gasparyan; Francisco Navarrete; Abraham B Torregrosa; Gabriel Rubio; Marta Marín-Mayor; Gabriela B Acosta; Maria Salud Garcia-Gutiérrez; Jorge Manzanares Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Marco Colizzi; Riccardo Bortoletto; Rosalia Costa; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Matteo Balestrieri Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jeremy J Watts; Maya R Jacobson; Nittha Lalang; Isabelle Boileau; Rachel F Tyndale; Michael Kiang; Ruth A Ross; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson; Pablo Rusjan; Romina Mizrahi Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 13.382