OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between depression, anthropometric parameters and body image in adults through a systematic review of the literature. METHOD: Medline, Lilacs and PsycInfo databases were searched by two independent reviewers up to August 2018, without language restriction, including cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies in adults (18-65 years), of both genders. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale instrument. The PRISMA standards were adopted for the conduct of this review, whose protocol is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42018105248. RESULTS: The search resulted in 1,770 articles; however, a total of 5 articles were included in this review, whose designs were transversal. Quality scores ranged from 8 to 9 points. The association between depression, anthropometric parameters, and body image was found in all included studies, regardless of the different statistical methods employed. Women perceived their body larger than it really was by idealizing a lean body, whereas in men the perception of being underweight or dissatisfaction was observed by idealizing a larger body, both conditions were associated with the presence of depression or depressive symptoms and body mass index in the same time. CONCLUSION: Depression, anthropometric parameters and body image were associated. It is necessary to conduct other studies, especially longitudinal studies to elucidate the relationship among depression, weight, body image, and other associated factors.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between depression, anthropometric parameters and body image in adults through a systematic review of the literature. METHOD: Medline, Lilacs and PsycInfo databases were searched by two independent reviewers up to August 2018, without language restriction, including cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies in adults (18-65 years), of both genders. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale instrument. The PRISMA standards were adopted for the conduct of this review, whose protocol is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42018105248. RESULTS: The search resulted in 1,770 articles; however, a total of 5 articles were included in this review, whose designs were transversal. Quality scores ranged from 8 to 9 points. The association between depression, anthropometric parameters, and body image was found in all included studies, regardless of the different statistical methods employed. Women perceived their body larger than it really was by idealizing a lean body, whereas in men the perception of being underweight or dissatisfaction was observed by idealizing a larger body, both conditions were associated with the presence of depression or depressive symptoms and body mass index in the same time. CONCLUSION:Depression, anthropometric parameters and body image were associated. It is necessary to conduct other studies, especially longitudinal studies to elucidate the relationship among depression, weight, body image, and other associated factors.
Authors: Miguel A Ortega; Óscar Fraile-Martínez; Cielo García-Montero; Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon; Guillermo Lahera; Jorge Monserrat; Maria Llavero-Valero; Fernando Mora; Roberto Rodríguez-Jiménez; Sonia Fernandez-Rojo; Javier Quintero; Melchor Alvarez De Mon Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-05-18
Authors: James Buszkiewicz; Chelsea Rose; Shilpi Gupta; Linda K Ko; Jin Mou; Anne V Moudon; Philip M Hurvitz; Andrea Cook; Anju Aggarwal; Adam Drewnowski Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2020-08-21
Authors: Miguel A Ortega; Óscar Fraile-Martínez; Cielo García-Montero; Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon; Guillermo Lahera; Jorge Monserrat; Maria Llavero-Valero; Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas; Rosa Molina; Roberto Rodríguez-Jimenez; Javier Quintero; Melchor Alvarez De Mon Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Cristina Bouzas; Maria Del Mar Bibiloni; Silvia Garcia; David Mateos; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Dolores Corella; Albert Goday; J Alfredo Martínez; Ángel M Alonso-Gómez; Julia Wärnberg; Jesús Vioque; Dora Romaguera; José Lopez-Miranda; Ramon Estruch; Francisco J Tinahones; José Lapetra; Lluís Serra-Majem; Blanca Riquelme-Gallego; Vicente Martín-Sánchez; Xavier Pintó; José J Gaforio; Pilar Matía; Josep Vidal; Clotilde Vázquez; Lidia Daimiel; Emilio Ros; Elena Pascual-Roquet-Jalmar; Nancy Babio; Inmaculada Gonzalez-Monge; Olga Castañer; Itziar Abete; Carolina Sorto-Sánchez; Juan Carlos Benavente-Marín; Laura Torres-Collado; Marian Martin; Antonio García-Ríos; Sara Castro-Barquero; Jose C Fernández-García; José Manuel Santos-Lozano; Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro; Albert Salas-Huetos; Patricia Guillem-Saiz; María Dolores Zomeño; Maria Ángeles Zulet; Amaia Goikoetxea-Bahon; Alfredo Gea; Stephanie K Nishi; Helmut Schröder; Josep A Tur Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-07-22
Authors: Débora Godoy-Izquierdo; Raquel Lara; Adelaida Ogallar; Alejandra Rodríguez-Tadeo; María J Ramírez; Estefanía Navarrón; Félix Arbinaga Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Débora Godoy-Izquierdo; Juan González-Hernández; Alejandra Rodríguez-Tadeo; Raquel Lara; Adelaida Ogallar; Estefanía Navarrón; María J Ramírez; Clara López-Mora; Félix Arbinaga Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carmen Galán-Arroyo; Damián Pereira-Payo; Ángel Denche-Zamorano; Miguel A Hernández-Mocholí; Eugenio Merellano-Navarro; Jorge Pérez-Gómez; Jorge Rojo-Ramos; José Carmelo Adsuar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 3.390