Literature DB >> 31165546

The quest to decipher HLA immunogenicity: Telling friend from foe.

Anat R Tambur1, Hannah McDowell1, Reut Hod-Dvorai1, Maria A C Abundis1, David F Pinelli1.   

Abstract

Molecular mismatch load analysis was recently introduced as a means for performing risk stratification following organ transplantation. However, although good correlation was demonstrated between molecular mismatch load and generation of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA), quite a few exceptions exist, and the underlying factors that define HLA immunogenicity remain unclear. Herein, we present a new paradigm to interrogate differences between molecular mismatches that lead to the generation of de novo DSA and those that do not (the 2MM1DSA cohort). Specifically, patients transplanted across 2 HLA-DQ mismatches, who formed de novo DSA only to one mismatch (foe) but not the other (friend), provide a unique environment in which patient-specific factors that affect the immune response other than immunogenicity, such as infection and immunosuppression, can be controlled for. It further permits focusing on mismatches uniquely exhibited by the de novo DSA allele, rather than mismatches shared by both DSA and non-DSA alleles. This concept paper illustrates several examples, highlights the need for center-specific or population-specific cutoff values for posttransplant risk stratification, and mostly argues that if there is no direct correlation between molecular mismatch load and immunogenicity, then molecular mismatch load must not be adopted as an approach for equitable organ allocation.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloantibody; antigen presentation/recognition; clinical research/practice; histocompatibility; organ allocation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31165546     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Kidney Transplantation-Can We Do Better? The Promise and Limitations of Epitope/Eplet Matching.

Authors:  Olga Charnaya; Daniella Levy Erez; Sandra Amaral; Dimitrios S Monos
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Eplet Mismatch Load and De Novo Occurrence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies, Rejection, and Graft Failure after Kidney Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Aleksandar Senev; Maarten Coemans; Evelyne Lerut; Vicky Van Sandt; Johan Kerkhofs; Liesbeth Daniëls; Marleen Vanden Driessche; Veerle Compernolle; Ben Sprangers; Elisabet Van Loon; Jasper Callemeyn; Frans Claas; Anat R Tambur; Geert Verbeke; Dirk Kuypers; Marie-Paule Emonds; Maarten Naesens
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report.

Authors:  Anat R Tambur; Patricia Campbell; Anita S Chong; Sandy Feng; Mandy L Ford; Howard Gebel; Ronald G Gill; Garnett Kelsoe; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Roslyn B Mannon; Michael Mengel; Elaine F Reed; Nicole M Valenzuela; Chris Wiebe; I Esme Dijke; Harold C Sullivan; Peter Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Donor/Recipient HLA Molecular Mismatch Scores Predict Primary Humoral and Cellular Alloimmunity in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Maria Meneghini; Elena Crespo; Matthias Niemann; Alba Torija; Nuria Lloberas; Vincent Pernin; Pere Fontova; Edoardo Melilli; Alexandre Favà; Nuria Montero; Anna Manonelles; Josep Maria Cruzado; Eduard Palou; Jaume Martorell; Josep Maria Grinyó; Oriol Bestard
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Development of an immunogenicity score for HLA-DQ eplets: A conceptual study.

Authors:  Lara Schawalder; Gideon Hönger; Marc Kleiser; Michelle R van Heck; Loes A L van de Pasch; Sanne Vendelbosch; Erik H Rozemuller; Stefan Schaub
Journal:  HLA       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.513

6.  On the clinical relevance of using complete high-resolution HLA typing for an accurate interpretation of posttransplant immune-mediated graft outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Meneghini; Anna Perona; Elena Crespo; Frederike Bemelman; Petra Reinke; Ondrej Viklicky; Magali Giral; Eduard Palou; Alba Torija; Laura Donadeu; Edoardo Melilli; Jose Zuñiga; Anett Sefrin; Nils Lachmann; Liu Hu; Petra Hruba; Cécile Guillot-Gueguen; Sophie Brouard; Josep Grinyo; Oriol Bestard
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

7.  Clinical importance of extended second field high-resolution HLA genotyping for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Aleksandar Senev; Marie-Paule Emonds; Vicky Van Sandt; Evelyne Lerut; Maarten Coemans; Ben Sprangers; Dirk Kuypers; Maarten Naesens
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 8.086

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.