Elias Auer1, Sebastién Frey1, Johannes Kaesmacher2, Arsany Hakim3, David J Seiffge1, Martina Goeldlin1, Marcel Arnold1, Urs Fischer1, Simon Jung1, Thomas Raphael Meinel4. 1. Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. 2. Department of Neurology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 3. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. thomas.meinel@insel.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have proven at least equally effective in the prevention of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation as compared to the vitamin K antagonists (VKA), no reliable data on the severity of AIS of DOAC patients as compared to VKA is available. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected cohort of AIS patients, we performed univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, OR and 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) analyses regarding the severity of AIS in patients with preceding DOAC (N = 210) versus VKA (N = 173) therapy. Additionally, we provide a sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic anticoagulation activity. FINDINGS: In a comprehensive stroke center population, the frequency of AIS under DOAC was multiple times higher than previously reported at around 6% of all AIS and steadily increasing. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in VKA patients (median 7, IQR 2-14) was equal to DOAC (median 5, IQR 2-16) on univariate analysis (P = 0.229). According to the multivariable linear logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders of severe stroke, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 0.165, 95% CI - 1.874 to 1.545, P = 0.850) as compared to DOAC. Also in the sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic OAC therapy, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 1.392, 95% CI - 3.506 to 0.721, P = 0.195) as compared to DOAC. However, VKA as compared to DOAC was significantly associated with lower rates of good functional outcome at three months (0.527, 95% CI 0.300-0.928), but not with increased mortality (aOR 1.825, 95% CI 0.780-4.273). INTERPRETATION: Ischemic stroke in patients taking DOAC is an important and frequent scenario. Stroke severity in our real world population dataset is equal in patients taking VKA and DOAC, also in the case of warranted anticoagulation therapy. Preceding VKA as compared to DOAC was associated with lower rates of good functional outcome without excess mortality, but a causal relationship cannot be proven by our study design.
BACKGROUND: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have proven at least equally effective in the prevention of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation as compared to the vitamin K antagonists (VKA), no reliable data on the severity of AIS of DOACpatients as compared to VKA is available. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected cohort of AIS patients, we performed univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, OR and 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) analyses regarding the severity of AIS in patients with preceding DOAC (N = 210) versus VKA (N = 173) therapy. Additionally, we provide a sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic anticoagulation activity. FINDINGS: In a comprehensive stroke center population, the frequency of AIS under DOAC was multiple times higher than previously reported at around 6% of all AIS and steadily increasing. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in VKA patients (median 7, IQR 2-14) was equal to DOAC (median 5, IQR 2-16) on univariate analysis (P = 0.229). According to the multivariable linear logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders of severe stroke, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 0.165, 95% CI - 1.874 to 1.545, P = 0.850) as compared to DOAC. Also in the sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic OAC therapy, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 1.392, 95% CI - 3.506 to 0.721, P = 0.195) as compared to DOAC. However, VKA as compared to DOAC was significantly associated with lower rates of good functional outcome at three months (0.527, 95% CI 0.300-0.928), but not with increased mortality (aOR 1.825, 95% CI 0.780-4.273). INTERPRETATION:Ischemic stroke in patients taking DOAC is an important and frequent scenario. Stroke severity in our real world population dataset is equal in patients taking VKA and DOAC, also in the case of warranted anticoagulation therapy. Preceding VKA as compared to DOAC was associated with lower rates of good functional outcome without excess mortality, but a causal relationship cannot be proven by our study design.
Authors: Francesco Janes; Gian Luigi Gigli; Fedra Kuris; Mauro Morassi; Paolo Costa; Lorenzo Nesi; Roberta Giacomello; Federico Mazzacane; Eleonora Leuci; Anna Cavallini; Mariarosaria Valente Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Naja E Vinding; Jawad H Butt; Jonas B Olesen; Ying Xian; Søren Lund Kristensen; Rasmus Rørth; Anders Nissen Bonde; Anna Gundlund; Adelina Yafasova; Peter E Weeke; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber; Emil L Fosbøl Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Thomas R Meinel; Mattia Branca; Gian Marco De Marchis; Krassen Nedeltchev; Timo Kahles; Leo Bonati; Marcel Arnold; Mirjam R Heldner; Simon Jung; Emmanuel Carrera; Elisabeth Dirren; Patrik Michel; Davide Strambo; Carlo W Cereda; Giovanni Bianco; Georg Kägi; Jochen Vehoff; Mira Katan; Manuel Bolognese; Roland Backhaus; Stephan Salmen; Sylvan Albert; Friedrich Medlin; Christian Berger; Ludwig Schelosky; Susanne Renaud; Julien Niederhauser; Christophe Bonvin; Michael Schaerer; Marie-Luise Mono; Biljana Rodic; Alexander A Tarnutzer; Pasquale Mordasini; Jan Gralla; Johannes Kaesmacher; Stefan Engelter; Urs Fischer; David J Seiffge Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 10.422