Literature DB >> 31165230

Identification of ureteral stones at reduced radiation exposure: a pilot study comparing conventional versus digital low-dosage linear slot scanning (Lodox®) radiography.

Stefanie Fiechter1, Elio Geissbühler1, Alexandrine Bähler2, Verena Obmann2, Susan Meierhans1, Aris K Exadaktylos3, Andreas Christe2, George N Thalmann1, Beat Roth4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Digital low-dosage, linear slot scanning radiography (Lodox®) is an imaging modality that can emit down to one-tenth the radiation of conventional X-ray systems. We prospectively evaluated Lodox® as a diagnostic imaging modality in patients with ureterolithiasis.
METHODS: Conventional kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) X-ray and Lodox® were performed in 41 patients presenting with acute flank pain due to unilateral ureteral stone confirmed by computed tomography. KUB X-ray and Lodox® images were then reviewed by four blinded readers (urology expert/resident, radiology expert/resident). Identification rates were compared using Pearson's Chi square test. The impact of different parameters on stone identification by Lodox® was evaluated using logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models. Inter-reader agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
RESULTS: Median stone size was 5 mm (range 2-12), median stone density was 800 HU (range 200-1500). The identification rates of the urology expert were 68% for KUB X-ray and 90% for Lodox® (p = 0.014), and for all four readers 61% for KUB X-ray and 62% for Lodox® (p = 0.8). Radiation exposure for KUB X-ray and Lodox® was 0.45 mSv (SD ± 0.64) and 0.027 mSv (SD ± 0.038), respectively. Multivariable analyses showed an association between stone identification by Lodox® and stone size (p < 0.001), stone density (p = 0.005), lower body mass index (p = 0.005), and reader (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The high identification rates and low radiation doses of Lodox® make it a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis of ureteral stones. Further validation in larger cohorts, including performance evaluation for renal stones, is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.controlled-trails.com/ISRCTN12915426.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; Lodox®; Radiation exposure; Urolithiasis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31165230     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02803-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

1.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Victoriano Romero; Haluk Akpinar; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

2.  Management of uric acid stone.

Authors:  M N Chugtai; F A Khan; M Kaleem; M Ahmed
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 0.781

3.  A review of full-body radiography in nontraumatic emergency medicine.

Authors:  S P Whiley; G Mantokoudis; D Ott; H Zimmerman; A K Exadaktylos
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 1.112

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.