| Literature DB >> 31164785 |
Mieko Yokozuka1, Kanako Okazaki1, Yuko Sakamoto2, Koko Takahashi2.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose was to clarify the relationship between foot morphology and toe muscle strength in female university students. [Participants and Methods] Data from 103 female university students (age, 20.4 ± 1.6 years) on height, body weight, pain in the foot and toes, heel height (cm) of shoes worn in everyday life, and the number of times (per week) shoes with heels ≥3 cm were worn were collected. The hallux valgus angle and medial longitudinal arch height ratio of the foot were measured, and toe muscle strength was evaluated according to the strength of the toe flexor and abductor hallucis muscles.Entities:
Keywords: Arch height rate; Hallux valgus; Toe flexor strength
Year: 2019 PMID: 31164785 PMCID: PMC6511503 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.31.457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Comparison of height, weight, BMI, toe pain, and shoe type according to HV angle
| HV angle | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <16° (n=70) bilateral foot | ≥16° (n=33) hemilateral or bilateral foot | |||
| Height (cm, mean ± SD) | 157.3 ± 5.3 | 159.1 ± 5.3 | 0.10 | |
| Weight (kg, mean ± SD) | 51.8 ± 7.4 | 51.2 ± 5.1 | 0.99 | |
| BMI | ||||
| <18.5 (no) | 14 | 6 | 0.36 | |
| 18.5 to <25 (no) | 50 | 27 | ||
| 25 to <30 (no) | 5 | 0 | ||
| ≥30 (no) | 1 | 0 | ||
| Foot or toe pain | ||||
| Present (no) | 2 | 6 | 0.01 | |
| Absent (no) | 68 | 27 | ||
| Heel height | ||||
| <3 (cm, no) | 26 | 12 | 0.90 | |
| 3 to <5 (cm, no) | 15 | 6 | ||
| ≥5 (cm, no) | 29 | 15 | ||
| Frequency of wearing high heels (>3 cm) | ||||
| Never (no) | 23 | 11 | 0.70 | |
| 1–3 (times/week, no) | 20 | 7 | ||
| 4–7 (times/week, no) | 27 | 15 | ||
Comparison of foot morphology and toe muscle strength according to HV angle
| HV angle | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| <16° | ≥16° | ||
| HV angle (degrees) | 10.9 ± 2.6 | 19.6 ± 4.7 | <0.001 |
| 11.0 (9.0–13.0) | 18.0 (16.0–20.8) | ||
| Arch height rate (mm/mm) | 19.3 ± 2.2 | 18.5 ± 3.0 | 0.03 |
| 19.4 (17.8–20.7) | 18.5 (16.1–20.1) | ||
| Toe flexor strength (kgf/kg) | 37.1 ± 10.2 | 36.1 ± 10.2 | 0.39 |
| 37.2 (29.5–42.7) | 33.5 (29.2–43.5) | ||
| Abductor hallucis strength (kgf/kg) | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 0.17 |
| 2.7 (2.1–3.3) | 2.6 (1.9–3.3) | ||
Mean ± standard deviation. Median (25th–75th percentile).
Correlation coefficient of foot morphology and toe muscle strength
| Total feet (n=206 feet) | |||
| Arch height rate | Toe flexor strength | Abductor hallucis strength | |
| HV angle (degrees) | −0.15* | −0.07 | −0.14* |
| Arch height rate (mm/mm) | 0.15* | −0.02 | |
| Toe flexor strength (kgf/kg) | 0.25** | ||
| HV angle <16° (n=150 feet) | |||
| Arch height rate | Toe flexor strength | Abductor hallucis strength | |
| HV angle (degrees) | −0.07 | −0.05 | −0.12 |
| Arch height rate (mm/mm) | 0.16* | −0.02 | |
| Toe flexor strength (kgf/kg) | 0.30** | ||
| HV angle ≥16° (n=56 feet) | |||
| Arch height rate | Toe flexor strength | Abductor hallucis strength | |
| HV angle (degrees) | −0.01 | 0.09 | −0.01 |
| Arch height rate (mm/mm) | 0.04 | −0.09 | |
| Toe flexor strength (kgf/kg) | 0.17 | ||
*p<0.05, **p<0.01.