Literature DB >> 31164067

Dosage Matters.

Carolee Winstein1, Bokkyu Kim2, Sujin Kim3, Clarisa Martinez4, Nicolas Schweighofer4.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- For stroke rehabilitation, task-specific training in animal models and human rehabilitation trials is considered important to modulate neuroplasticity, promote motor learning, and functional recovery. Little is known about what constitutes an effective dosage of therapy. Methods- This is a parallel group, 4 arms, single-blind, phase IIb, randomized controlled trial of 4 dosages of arm therapy delivered in an outpatient setting chronically after stroke. Participants were randomized into groups that varied in duration of scheduled therapy (ie, 0, 15, 30, or 60 hours). Forty-one participants completed the study. Planned primary analyses used linear mixed effects regression to model changes from baseline to postintervention in the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement rating and the Wolf Motor Function Test time score over 3 weeks of training as a function of therapy dosage. Results- We observed a dose response for the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement: the model that included dose and dose by week interaction significantly better fit the data than the model that included week only (log-likelihood test, P=0.0026). In addition, the greater the dosage of training, the greater the change in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement, with the dose by week interaction parameter equal to 0.0045 ( P=0.0016; 95% CI, 0.0018-0.0071). Over the 3 weeks of therapy, there was a gain of 0.92 in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement for the 60-hour group compared to the 0-hour group. There was no dose response for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Conclusions- For mild-to-moderately impaired stroke survivors, the dosage of patient-centered, task-specific practice systematically influences the gain in quality of arm use but not functional capacity. We caution that we may have been underpowered for the functional capacity outcome. These findings highlight the importance of recovery outcomes that capture arm use in the natural environment. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01749358.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor activity; movement; patient preference; rehabilitation; survivors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31164067     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  15 in total

1.  The probability of choosing both hands depends on an interaction between motor capacity and limb-specific control in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Rini Varghese; Jason J Kutch; Nicolas Schweighofer; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Predictors of Arm Nonuse in Chronic Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Rini Varghese; Harrison Stoll; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Cheol E Han; Bokkyu Kim; Carolee J Winstein; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Beth Clark; Jill Whitall; Gert Kwakkel; Jan Mehrholz; Sean Ewings; Jane Burridge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Individualized feedback to change multiple gait deficits in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Kevin A Day; Kendra M Cherry-Allen; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.208

6.  Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of an intensified robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke: a case control study.

Authors:  Aida Sehle; Jana Stuerner; Thomas Hassa; Stefan Spiteri; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Joachim Liepert
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Group-based constraint-induced movement therapy in the rehabilitation of chronic poststroke patients.

Authors:  Fábio R O Galvão; Maria C A Silvestre; Camila L A Gomes; Nayara K F Pereira; Viviane T B Nóbrega; Wellington S Lima; Afonson L M Gondim; Enio W A Cacho; Roberta O Cacho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Comparing two identically protocolized, multicentre, randomized controlled trials on caregiver-mediated exercises poststroke: Any differences across countries?

Authors:  Marijn Mulder; Rinske H M Nijland; Judith D M Vloothuis; Maayken van den Berg; Maria Crotty; Gert Kwakkel; Erwin E H van Wegen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Corticospinal Tract Microstructure Predicts Distal Arm Motor Improvements in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Bokkyu Kim; Nicolas Schweighofer; Justin P Haldar; Richard M Leahy; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.655

10.  Targeted Engagement of the Action Selection Network during Task-Oriented Arm Training after Stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Kaci Handlery; Jessica F Baird; Erika L Blanck; Geetanjali Pathak; Stacy L Fritz
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.