Literature DB >> 31163133

The combined impact of maternal age and body mass index on cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization.

Randi H Goldman1, Leslie V Farland2, Ann Muir Thomas3, Chloe A Zera4, Elizabeth S Ginsburg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is critical to evaluate the combined impact of age and body mass index on the cumulative likelihood of live birth following in vitro fertilization, as achieving a lower body mass index before infertility treatment often is recommended for women with overweight and obesity. It is important to consider whether achieving a particular body mass index, thus resulting in an older age at in vitro fertilization cycle start, is beneficial or harmful to the likelihood of live birth.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the combined impact of age and body mass index on the cumulative live birth rate following in vitro fertilization to inform when delaying in vitro fertilization treatment to achieve a lower body mass index may be beneficial or detrimental to the likelihood of live birth. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study using linked fresh and cryopreserved/frozen cycles from January 2014 to December 2015 from the Society for Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, representing >90% of in vitro fertilization cycles performed in the United States. The primary outcome was live birth as measured by cumulative live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate. Poisson and logistic regression were used to calculate risk and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to determine differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage, as appropriate, among first fresh in vitro fertilization cycles compared across age (years) and body mass index (kg/m2) categories. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals to determine differences in the cumulative live birth rate using fresh plus linked frozen embryo transfer cycles.
RESULTS: There were 51,959 first fresh cycles using autologous eggs and 16,067 subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles. There were 21,395 live births, for an overall cumulative live birth rate of 41.2% per cycle start. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and cumulative live birth rate decreased with increasing body mass index and age, and the miscarriage rate increased with increasing body mass index and age (linear trend P<.001 for all). Body mass index had a greater influence on live birth at younger ages as compared with older ages.
CONCLUSIONS: Age-related decline in fertility has a greater impact than body mass index on the cumulative live birth rate at older ages, suggesting that taking time to achieve lower body mass index before in vitro fertilization may be detrimental for older women with overweight or obesity. Delaying conception to lose weight before in vitro fertilization should be informed by the combination of age and body mass index.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; cumulative live birth rate; in vitro fertilization; infertility; maternal age; obesity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31163133     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Various Parameters as Predictors of The Success Rate of In Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Radin Dabbagh Rezaeiyeh; Arian Mehrara; Amin Mohammad Ali Pour; Jafar Fallahi; Sedighe Forouhari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Logistic regression analyses of factors affecting fertility of intrauterine adhesions patients.

Authors:  Xingping Zhao; Yunzhi Liu; Aiqian Zhang; Bingsi Gao; Qing Feng; Huan Huang; Xiuting Zhu; Xin Sun; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

3.  Predictive Significance of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing in Early Pregnancy Loss in Infertile Couples Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

Authors:  Minh Tam Le; Trung Van Nguyen; Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen; Hiep Tuyet Thi Nguyen; Duong Dinh Le; Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-06-01

4.  Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Chia-Ling Liu; Hafsatou Diop; Howard J Cabral; Stacey A Missmer; Charles C Coddington; Sunah S Hwang; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Association Between Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Singleton Pregnancies After Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Hanxiang Sun; Yang Liu; Shijia Huang; Xiaosong Liu; Guohua Li; Qiaoling Du
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Cumulative live birth rate according to the number of receiving governmental subsidies for assisted reproductive technology in Saitama Prefecture, Japan: A retrospective study using individual data for governmental subsidies.

Authors:  Seung Chik Jwa; Osamu Ishihara; Akira Kuwahara; Kazuki Saito; Hidekazu Saito; Yukihiro Terada; Yasuki Kobayashi; Eri Maeda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-20

7.  Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer.

Authors:  Phillip A Romanski; Pietro Bortoletto; Brady Magaoay; Alice Chung; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A Slower Age-Related Decline in Treatment Outcomes After the First Ovarian Stimulation for in vitro Fertilization in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Jing Li; Xiaocong Liu; Linli Hu; Fuli Zhang; Fang Wang; Huijuan Kong; Shanjun Dai; Yihong Guo
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  IVF outcomes in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  V Grzegorczyk-Martin; T Fréour; A De Bantel Finet; E Bonnet; M Merzouk; J Roset; V Roger; I Cédrin-Durnerin; R Wainer; C Avril; P Landais
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The Combined Impact of Female and Male Body Mass Index on Cumulative Pregnancy Outcomes After the First Ovarian Stimulation.

Authors:  Zhonghua Zhao; Xue Jiang; Jing Li; Menghui Zhang; Jinhao Liu; Shanjun Dai; Hao Shi; Yuling Liang; Li Yang; Yihong Guo
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.