Literature DB >> 31162814

Factors associated with polyp detection during colonoscopy: A retrospective observational study.

Chun-Wei Chen1, Cheng-Tang Chiu1,2, Ming-Yao Su1,2, Chun-Jung Lin1, Chen-Ming Hsu1, Siew-Na Lim3, Chau-Ting Yeh1,2,4, Wey-Ran Lin1,2,4.   

Abstract

The polyp detection rate (PDR) is an important quality indicator for colonoscopy. Several factors have been shown to be associated with PDR. However, whether the moderate sedation is a factor for polyp detection remains controversial. This study aims to assess factors associated with polyp detection including the moderate sedation factor during colonoscopy. Patients who underwent colonoscopy from June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015 were enrolled into this retrospective study. Patients with poor colon preparation and failure to reach the cecum were excluded. The clinical factors, including patient's sex, age, midazolam/fentanyl sedation, indications, endoscopist colonoscopy volume, and use of antispasmodic agent were evaluated by multivariate analysis. A total of 3373 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55.8 years, and 1980 patients (58.7%) were male. Among the 3373 patients, 2513 (74.5%) underwent midazolam/fentanyl-based sedated colonoscopy. The multivariate analysis showed that male sex, age over 50 years old, midazolam/fentanyl sedation and indications of screening and surveillance were significantly associated with polyp detection. Moreover, when stratified by sex and age, the midazolam/fentanyl sedation was associated with polyp detection in male patients and patients over 50 years old. This study has highlighted the role of midazolam/fentanyl sedation administered by colonoscopists as a modifiable factor that may increase polyp detection during colonoscopy.
© 2019 The Authors. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia on behalf of Kaohsiung Medical University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; polyp detection rate; sedation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31162814     DOI: 10.1002/kjm2.12090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Anesthesia Assistance in Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.

Authors:  Min Liang; Xinyan Zhang; Chunhong Xu; Junli Cao; Zongwang Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yue Sui; Qing Wang; Hai-Hua Chen; Jun-Hui Lu; Qing Wen; Zhen-Zhen Wang; Guan-Feng Wang; Hui Jia; Tao Xiao; Na-Ping Wang; Jun-Lian Hao; Yi-Ping Zhang; Feng-Zhen Cao; Xiao-Peng Wu; Xing Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yue Sui; Xing Chen; Ting Ma; Junhui Lu; Tao Xiao; Zhenzhen Wang; Qing Wen; Guanfeng Wang; Hui Jia; Fengzhen Cao; Xiaopeng Wu; Yiping Zhang; Junlian Hao; Naping Wang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.369

4.  The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement and risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in polyps sized 6 to 20 millimeters: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Chen; Chia-Jung Kuo; Cheng-Tang Chiu; Ming-Yao Su; Chun-Jung Lin; Puo-Hsien Le; Siew-Na Lim; Chau-Ting Yeh; Malcolm R Alison; Wey-Ran Lin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Gastrointestinal endoscopy nurse assistance during colonoscopy and polyp detection: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Aihong Liu; Huashe Wang; Yijia Lin; Liping Fu; Yanan Liu; Shuhong Yan; Honglei Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.