| Literature DB >> 31162799 |
Jialuo Mai1,2, Jiayu Gu1, Ying Liu3, Xincheng Liu1, Ke Sai4,5, Zhijie Chen4,5, Wanjun Lu1, Xiaozhi Yang1, Jingyi Wang1, Cui Guo1, Shuxin Sun4,5, Fan Xing1, Longxiang Sheng1, Bingzheng Lu1, Zhu Zhu1, Hongjiaqi Sun1, Dongdong Xue1, Yuan Lin1, Jing Cai1, Yaqian Tan1, Chuntao Li1, Wei Yin6, Lin Cao2, Ying Ou-Yang7, Pengxin Qiu1, Xingwen Su1, Guangmei Yan1, Jiankai Liang1, Wenbo Zhu1.
Abstract
Activation of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) pathway induces glial differentiation of glioblastoma (GBM) cells, but the mechanism by which microRNA (miRNA) regulate this process remains poorly understood. In this study, by performing miRNA genomics and loss- and gain-of-function assays in dibutyryl-cAMP-treated GBM cells, we identified a critical negative regulator, hsa-miR-1275, that modulates a set of genes involved in cancer progression, stem cell maintenance, and cell maturation and differentiation. Additionally, we confirmed that miR-1275 directly and negatively regulates the protein expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of mature astrocytes. Of note, tri-methyl-histone H3 (Lys27) (H3K27me3), downstream of the PKA/polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) pathway, accounts for the downregulation of miR-1275. Furthermore, decreased miR-1275 expression and induction of GFAP expression were also observed in dibutyryl-cAMP-treated primary cultured GBM cells. In a patient-derived glioma stem cell tumor model, a cAMP elevator and an inhibitor of H3K27me3 methyltransferase inhibited tumor growth, induced differentiation, and reduced expression of miR-1275. In summary, our study shows that epigenetic inhibition of miR-1275 by the cAMP/PKA/PRC2/H3K27me3 pathway mediates glial induction of GBM cells, providing a new mechanism and novel targets for differentiation-inducing therapy.Entities:
Keywords: GBM; H3K27me3; cAMP; differentiation therapy; miR-1275
Year: 2019 PMID: 31162799 PMCID: PMC6599839 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Oncol ISSN: 1574-7891 Impact factor: 6.603
Figure 1miRNA expression profile in DBTRG‐05MG cells exposed to dbcAMP. (A) Dose effects of dbcAMP on morphology changes in DBTRG‐05MG cells. Cells were treated with 0.125–1 mm dbcAMP for 3 days, and then, phase‐contrast microscopy images were captured. Scale bar, 200 μm. (B) Dose effects of dbcAMP on DBTRG‐05MG cell proliferation rate. Cells were treated with 0.125 mm to 1 mm dbcAMP for 3 days. EdU‐incorporation assays were performed at the endpoint, and then, fluorescence images were captured. EdU‐positive cells are shown in green. DAPI is shown in blue. Scale bar, 500 μm. (C) Histogram of EdU‐positive cells treated with different doses of dbcAMP (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001. (D) Western blot analysis of GFAP and the proliferation marker PCNA in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with different doses of dbcAMP for 3 days. β‐Actin was used as the loading control (upper). Histogram of relative GFAP expression in cells treated with dbcAMP (lower, n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (E) Correlation analysis of DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with 1 mm dbcAMP at different time points. (F) Heatmap of the miRNA expression levels in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells.
miRNA expression levels increased more than three‐fold in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG cells.
| miRNA | 6 h | 12 h |
|---|---|---|
| hsa‐miR‐3656 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐487a |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐191‐3p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐628‐5p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐139‐5p |
| 1.38969202 |
| hsa‐miR‐301b |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐3065‐5p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐3613‐3p |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐652‐3p |
| 1.10538946 |
| hsa‐miR‐887 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐3929 |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐4647 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐301a‐3p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐1256 |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐4659a‐3p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐3940‐3p |
| 1.82375584 |
| hsa‐miR‐497‐5p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐655 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐570‐5p |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐548ai |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐212‐5p |
| 1.21579411 |
| hsa‐miR‐5584‐5p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐548an |
| 1.21562156 |
| hsa‐miR‐32‐5p |
| 2.43234323 |
| hsa‐miR‐616‐3p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐450b‐5p |
| 2.08453803 |
| hsa‐miR‐4525 | 1.05280528 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐656 | 2.4563783 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐766‐3p | 1.05335534 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐660‐3p | 1.05280528 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐431‐3p | 1.57975798 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐3129‐3p | 1.05280528 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐548s | 2.10671067 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐624‐5p | 1.05335534 |
|
The significance items have been highlighted in Bold fonts.
miRNA expression levels decreased by more than 70% in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG cells.
| miRNA | 6 h | 12 h |
|---|---|---|
| hsa‐miR‐4508 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐331‐3p |
| 0.42183677 |
| hsa‐miR‐3662 |
| 1.21579411 |
| hsa‐miR‐3065‐3p |
| 1.51965906 |
| hsa‐miR‐138‐1‐3p |
| 0.91174045 |
| hsa‐miR‐380‐5p |
| 0.30382183 |
| hsa‐miR‐187‐5p |
| 0.48636164 |
| hsa‐miR‐532‐5p |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐1275 |
| 1.70215574 |
| hsa‐miR‐4688 |
|
|
| hsa‐miR‐362‐3p |
| 0.37411168 |
| hsa‐miR‐3614‐3p |
| 0.46759729 |
| hsa‐miR‐324‐5p | 1.10836469 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐3648 | 1.05297892 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐24‐1‐5p | 0.63176419 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐4436b‐3p | 0.42113946 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐769‐3p | 1.05301364 |
|
| hsa‐miR‐490‐3p | 1.26352838 |
|
The significance items have been highlighted in Bold fonts.
Figure 2Identification of miR‐1275 as a key regulator that contributes to proliferation inhibition and differentiation induction. (A) Schematic diagrams of the miRNA found to be critical in dbcAMP‐induced GBM cell differentiation (left) and miRNA gain‐ and loss‐of‐function assays (right). (B) Quantification of proliferation inhibition rate of dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miRNA inhibitors (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. (C) Quantification of the proliferation inhibition rate of dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miRNA mimics (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. ***, P < 0.001. (D) Western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miRNA inhibitors. Tubulin was used as the loading control. (E) Western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miRNA mimics. Tubulin was used as the loading control. (F) Quantification of western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miR‐1275 mimics (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t‐test. *, P < 0.05.
Figure 3miR‐1275 negatively regulates a set of genes involved in cell development and cell maturation. (A) GSEA of transcriptome data performed by comparing DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miR‐1275 mimic with control cells. The top 10 most enriched upregulated pathways are listed. Normalized enrichment scores are shown in the bar chart. (B) GSEA of transcriptome data performed by comparing DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miR‐1275 mimic with the negative control cells. The top 10 most enriched downregulated pathways are listed. Normalized enrichment scores are shown in the bar chart. (C) GSEA enrichment plots of genes ranked based on miR‐1275 mimic‐treated versus SPIRA_SMOKERS_LUNG_CANCER_UP and BHATTACHARYA_EMBRYONIC_STEM_CELL gene sets. (D) GSEA enrichment plots of genes ranked based on miRNA mimic NC‐treated versus GO_POSITIVE_REGULATION_OF_ EPITHELIAL_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION and GO_CELL_MATURATION gene sets. (E) Heatmap of the expression level of embryonic stem cell genes. High expression is shown in red, and low expression is shown in blue. (F) Heatmap of the expression level of cell maturation. High expression is shown in red, and low expression is shown in blue.
Figure 4Negative contribution of miR‐1275 to GFAP expression by targeting the 3′‐UTR. (A) Western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miR‐1275 mimic. β‐Actin was used as the loading control. (B) Western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with miR‐1275 inhibitor. β‐Actin was used as the loading control. (C) Left panel: the predicted binding site of miR‐1275 in the GFAP 3′‐UTR is indicated (arrowhead). The complementary sequences between GFAP and miR‐1275 are indicated above the arrowheads. The nucleotide position of the targsite is indicated relative to the position of the GFAP stop codon (the first nucleotide after the stop codon of GFAP is defined as 1). Right panel: schemes for the reporter vectors; the wild‐type GFAP 3′‐UTR sequence (upper) and mutant GFAP 3′‐UTR sequence (lower) are shown. Black triangles indicate predicted miR‐1275 binding sites within the 3′‐UTR of the GFAP gene. (D) Luciferase reporter assays with the GFAP‐3′‐UTR reporter vector and miRNA fragments in DBTRG‐05MG cells. The luciferase values are relative to the Renilla luciferase activity (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. **, P < 0.01. NS, not significant. (E) Luciferase reporter assays with the wild‐type GFAP‐3’‐UTR reporter vector and miRNA fragments in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells. The luciferase values are relative to the Renilla luciferase activity (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. Error bars indicate SD. **, P < 0.01. NS, not significant.
Figure 5PRC2‐dependent H3K27me3 downstream of PKA mediates miR‐1275 downregulation. (A) The effects of KT5720 on miR‐1275 expression in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. *, P < 0.05. NS, not significant. (B) The effects of the PKA inhibitor KT5720 on the proliferation rate of dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. NS, not significant. (C) Western blot analysis of the effects of KT5720 on GFAP expression in dbcAMP‐treated DBTRG‐05MG cells. β‐actin was used as loading control. (D) GSEA enrichment plot of genes ranked based on dbcAMP‐induced differentiation versus the PRC2_EZH2_DN.V1_DN gene set. (E) Quantification of H3K27MTase activity in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with 0.5 mm dbcAMP (n = 3), 10 μm KT5720, and 10 μm EPZ005687 for 3 days. Error bars indicate SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one‐way ANOVA. *, P < 0.05. NS, not significant. (F) Western blot analysis of GFAP and H3K27me3 in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with different doses of dbcAMP for 3 days. β‐Actin and histone H3 were used as the loading controls. (G) Western blot analysis of H3K27me3 in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with 0.5 mm dbcAMP and 10 μm KT5720 for 3 days. Histone H3 was used as the loading controls. (H) Western blot analysis of PKA and H3K27me3 in DBTRG‐05MG cells transfected with negative control siRNA (siNC) or siPKA and then treated with 0.5 mm dbcAMP for 3 days. Tubulin and histone H3 were used as the loading controls. (I) Western blot analysis of GFAP and H3K27me3 in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with 0.5 mm dbcAMP or 10 μm GSK J1 for 3 days. β‐Actin and histone H3 were used as the loading controls. (J) Western blot analysis of GFAP and H3K27me3 in DBTRG‐05MG cells treated with 0.5 mm dbcAMP and different doses of EPZ005687 for 3 days. β‐Actin and histone H3 were used as the loading controls. (K) A diagrammatic representation of the pri‐miR‐1275 promoter is shown (left panel). The transcription start site (arrow) and location of pri‐miR‐1275 (black box) are indicated. Thick bars represent the region analyzed by ChIP‐PCR. The H3K27me3 status in the pri‐miR‐1275 promoter region before and after dbcAMP exposure is shown (right panel, n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t‐test. Error bars indicate SD. **, P < 0.01.
Figure 6miR‐1275 downregulation is involved in dbcAMP‐induced differentiation in human GBM cells derived patient and xenografts derived from GSCs. (A) Effects of dbcAMP on GFAP expression in primary cultured human GBM cells. Cells were treated with 1 mm dbcAMP for 3 days, and β‐actin was used as the loading control. (B) Effects of dbcAMP on miR‐1275 expression in primary cultured human GBM cells. Cells were treated with 1 mm dbcAMP for 3 days. (C) Western blot analysis of GFAP in dbcAMP‐treated primary cultured human GBM cells transfected with miR‐1275 mimic. β‐Actin was used as the loading control. (D) Nu/nu mice were subcutaneously inoculated with patient‐derived GSCs (n = 5 per group). Seven days after inoculation, mice were intraperitoneally treated with vehicle, luteolin (20 mg·kg−1·day−1), GSK J4 (100 mg·kg−1·day−1), or combination of luteolin and GSK J4; 30 days after inoculation, the tumor‐bearing mice were sacrificed and tumor from each group was photographed. (E) The tumor volume (means ± SDs) was recorded every other day after inoculation. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated‐measure ANOVA. *, P < 0.05. (F) Tumor from the mice were subjected to immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of GFAP, cleaved caspase 3, Ki‐67, and H3K27me3. Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) ISH was performed on tumor from mice xenograft model to evaluate expression of miR‐1275. Scale bar, 100 μm.