Adesola Olubunmi Adekoya 1 , Musili Bolanle Fetuga 2 , Olumide Olatokunbo Jarrett 3 , Tinuade Adetutu Ogunlesi 2 , Jean-Pierre Chanoine 4 , Olubunmi Obafemi Oba-Daini 2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
AIM: To document normative data on penile size and anogenital distances of apparently normal term male infants in Sagamu, Nigeria. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 303 term male infants within the first 72 hours of life. Stretched penile length, penile width and three measures of anogenital distances were recorded: anogenital distance-1, anogenital distance-2 and anoscrotal distance. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) stretched penile length and penile width were 39.4 ± 4.2 mm and 11.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. The mean values for anogenital distance-1, anogenital distance-2 and the anoscrotal distance were 48.7 ± 3.9 mm, 42.8 ± 4.6 mm and 25.5 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. Only penile width and anogenital distance-1 significantly correlated with all the anthropometric parameters but anogenital distance-1 had the strongest correlation (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSION: The observed mean stretched penile length was greater than previously reported. Local references are preferable in interpreting anogenital measurements in newborns to avoid diagnostic errors. There is need for a consensus on the definition of micropenis. ©2019 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
AIM: To document normative data on penile size and anogenital distances of apparently normal term male infants in Sagamu, Nigeria. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 303 term male infants within the first 72 hours of life. Stretched penile length, penile width and three measures of anogenital distances were recorded: anogenital distance-1, anogenital distance-2 and anoscrotal distance. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) stretched penile length and penile width were 39.4 ± 4.2 mm and 11.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. The mean values for anogenital distance-1, anogenital distance-2 and the anoscrotal distance were 48.7 ± 3.9 mm, 42.8 ± 4.6 mm and 25.5 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. Only penile width and anogenital distance-1 significantly correlated with all the anthropometric parameters but anogenital distance-1 had the strongest correlation (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSION: The observed mean stretched penile length was greater than previously reported. Local references are preferable in interpreting anogenital measurements in newborns to avoid diagnostic errors. There is need for a consensus on the definition of micropenis . ©2019 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Anogenital distances; Correlation; Normative data; Penile width; Stretched penile length
Year: 2019
PMID: 31162733 DOI: 10.1111/apa.14885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Paediatr ISSN: 0803-5253 Impact factor: 2.299