Literature DB >> 31162371

Tracheal Size and Morphology on the Reconstructed CT Imaging.

Soichi Mizuguchi1,2, Yoshitomo Motomura1,2, Jun Maki3, Rieko Baba1,2, Yuko Ichimiya1,2, Kentaro Tokuda3, Noriyuki Kaku1,2, Hidetoshi Takada1, Yoshihiko Maehara2, Shouichi Ohga1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the real size and morphology of tracheas in childhood for the optimal selection of endotracheal tube.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who received CT scan of the cervical spine from July 2011 to March 2018. Cross-sectional CT images vertical to trachea were reconstructed and the accurate tracheal diameters were measured. The validity of the traditional age-based formula for predicting the endotracheal tube size was assessed for the best fit to trachea.
SETTING: Tertiary Emergency and Critical Care Center of Kyushu University Hospital. PATIENTS: Children, who are 1 month to 15 years old, received CT scan of the cervical spine.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 86 children with median age of 53 months. The cross-sectional shape of pediatric trachea was circular at the cricoid level and elliptical at the infraglottic level. The narrowest part of pediatric trachea was the transverse diameter at the infraglottic level at any age. Significant positive correlation between age and the narrowest diameter was observed. When compared the transverse diameter at the infraglottic level with the outer diameter of endotracheal tubes, uncuffed endotracheal tubes selection based on the traditional age-based formula ran a significant risk of oversized endotracheal intubation until 10 years old compared with cuffed endotracheal tubes selection (60.0% vs 23.8%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the safety and efficacy of cuffed endotracheal tubes in infants and children and the reconsideration for the airway management in pediatric anesthesia and intensive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31162371     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  1 in total

Review 1.  Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for neonates.

Authors:  Vedanta Dariya; Luca Moresco; Matteo Bruschettini; Luc P Brion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.