Literature DB >> 31161867

Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information across Different Sample Sizes Using Moment Matching and Nonlinear Regression.

Anna Heath1, Ioanna Manolopoulou2, Gianluca Baio2.   

Abstract

Background. The expected value of sample information (EVSI) determines the economic value of any future study with a specific design aimed at reducing uncertainty about the parameters underlying a health economic model. This has potential as a tool for trial design; the cost and value of different designs could be compared to find the trial with the greatest net benefit. However, despite recent developments, EVSI analysis can be slow, especially when optimizing over a large number of different designs. Methods. This article develops a method to reduce the computation time required to calculate the EVSI across different sample sizes. Our method extends the moment-matching approach to EVSI estimation to optimize over different sample sizes for the underlying trial while retaining a similar computational cost to a single EVSI estimate. This extension calculates the posterior variance of the net monetary benefit across alternative sample sizes and then uses Bayesian nonlinear regression to estimate the EVSI across these sample sizes. Results. A health economic model developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions for chronic pain demonstrates that this EVSI calculation method is fast and accurate for realistic models. This example also highlights how different trial designs can be compared using the EVSI. Conclusion. The proposed estimation method is fast and accurate when calculating the EVSI across different sample sizes. This will allow researchers to realize the potential of using the EVSI to determine an economically optimal trial design for reducing uncertainty in health economic models. Limitations. Our method involves rerunning the health economic model, which can be more computationally expensive than some recent alternatives, especially in complex models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expected value of sample information; health economic evaluation; nonlinear regression; trial design; value of information

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161867     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19837983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  5 in total

1.  Value of Information Analysis in Models to Inform Health Policy.

Authors:  Christopher H Jackson; Gianluca Baio; Anna Heath; Mark Strong; Nicky J Welton; Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.917

2.  Simulating Study Data to Support Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Mark Strong; David Glynn; Natalia Kunst; Nicky J Welton; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.749

3.  Calculating Expected Value of Sample Information Adjusting for Imperfect Implementation.

Authors:  Anna Heath
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.749

4.  Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Practical Guidance and Recommendations for Four Model-Based Methods.

Authors:  Natalia Kunst; Edward C F Wilson; David Glynn; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Gianluca Baio; Alan Brennan; Michael Fairley; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Chris Jackson; Hawre Jalal; Nicolas A Menzies; Mark Strong; Howard Thom; Anna Heath
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Prioritisation and design of clinical trials.

Authors:  Anna Heath; M G Myriam Hunink; Eline Krijkamp; Petros Pechlivanoglou
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 8.082

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.