| Literature DB >> 31161726 |
Robert Allan1,2, Adam P Sharples1,3, Matthew Cocks1, Barry Drust1, John Dutton4, Hannah F Dugdale1,5, Chris Mawhinney1,6, Angela Clucas1, Will Hawkins1, James P Morton1, Warren Gregson1.
Abstract
We assessed the effects of post-exercise cold-water immersion (CWI) in modulating PGC-1α mRNA expression in response to exercise commenced with low muscle glycogen availability. In a randomized repeated-measures design, nine recreationally active males completed an acute two-legged high-intensity cycling protocol (8 × 5 min at 82.5% peak power output) followed by 10 min of two-legged post-exercise CWI (8°C) or control conditions (CON). During each trial, one limb commenced exercise with low (LOW: <300 mmol·kg-1 dw) or very low (VLOW: <150 mmol·kg-1 dw) pre-exercise glycogen concentration, achieved via completion of a one-legged glycogen depletion protocol undertaken the evening prior. Exercise increased (P < 0.05) PGC-1α mRNA at 3 h post-exercise. Very low muscle glycogen attenuated the increase in PGC-1α mRNA expression compared with the LOW limbs in both the control (CON VLOW ~3.6-fold vs. CON LOW ~5.6-fold: P = 0.023, ES 1.22 Large) and CWI conditions (CWI VLOW ~2.4-fold vs. CWI LOW ~8.0 fold: P = 0.019, ES 1.43 Large). Furthermore, PGC-1α mRNA expression in the CWI-LOW trial was not significantly different to the CON LOW limb (P = 0.281, ES 0.67 Moderate). Data demonstrate that the previously reported effects of post-exercise CWI on PGC-1α mRNA expression (as regulated systemically via β-adrenergic mediated cell signaling) are offset in those conditions in which local stressors (i.e., high-intensity exercise and low muscle glycogen availability) have already sufficiently activated the AMPK-PGC-1α signaling axis. Additionally, data suggest that commencing exercise with very low muscle glycogen availability attenuates PGC-1α signaling.Entities:
Keywords: Carbohydrate; cooling; skeletal muscle; training adaptation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31161726 PMCID: PMC6546967 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Overview of the experimental protocol used in each trial. HIIT, High‐intensity intermittent exercise; CHO, carbohydrate; PRO, protein; CWI, cold water immersion condition; PPO, peak power output; CON, control condition; LOW, low CHO limb; VLOW, very low CHO limb.
Primer sequences used for real‐time polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Product length (base pairs) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| AAGACCTTGGGCTGGGACTG | TGGCTCGGCTGGCGAC | 168 |
|
| TGCTAAACGACTCCGAGAA | TGCAAAGTTCCCTCTCTGCT | 67 |
|
| ACCTATGGAAACTACTTCCTGAAA | CTGGCATTCTGGGAGCTTCA | 141 |
|
| CGGAAACAATACCTCCACCT | CACATGAAACAGACACCCCA | 186 |
|
| CGAGCAATTTCCACCTCTGT | GGTCACGCCGATCCATATAA | 94 |
|
| CCTGCCTAATGACCCCATGTT | CATAATACTGGAGCAGCACCCC | 137 |
|
| TGGCAAGTTGTCCAAAGAAACCTGT | GTTCCCTCCAACGCTGGGCA | 135 |
|
| AAATTGAGATTGATGGAACAGAGAA | TATGGCCTGGCTTACACATTCA | 95 |
|
| TGCCAATTCAGACTCTGTGC | CCAGCTTCACCCCATAGAAA | 212 |
|
| TCTCCAACTGGACGAGCAAC | CAGCAGGAGGACCGCAAATA | 101 |
Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase –GAPDH; Peroxisome Proliferator‐activated receptor gamma coactivator 1‐alpha – PGC‐1α; Tumour suppressor protein 53‐ p53; Sirtuin 1 – SIRT1; Cytochrome C oxidase subunit 4 – COXIV; Citrate synthase – CS; Mitochondrial transcription factor A – TFAM; Nuclear respiratory factor 2 – NRF2; Estrogen‐related receptor alpha – ERRα; Glucose transporter type 4 – GLUT4.
Figure 2Skeletal muscle glycogen content immediately pre‐ and post‐exercise and after 3 h of recovery. Biopsies were obtained from both limbs in each condition (CON or CWI) with limbs starting the day being low (LOW) or very low (VLOW) in glycogen stores. A main effect for time (P = 0.001) and condition (P = 0.008) was observed. No interaction effects were present (P > 0.05). *Significantly different from PRE. a Significantly lower than contralateral LOW limb (P < 0.05). Data are mean ± SD.
Heart rate (n = 9), oxygen uptake (n = 8), and subjective shivering measures (n = 9) during immersion and the post‐immersion period (mean ± SD)
| PreIm | Immersion | Post‐Immersion | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 min | 4 min | 6 min | 8 min | 10 min | 2 min | 4 min | 6 min | 8 min | 10 min | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | |||
| HR (beats·min−1) | CON | 84 ± 5 | 81 ± 4 | 82 ± 2 | 80 ± 3 | 78 ± 5 | 82 ± 7 | 84 ± 5 | 83 ± 5 | 80 ± 6 | 82 ± 5 | 80 ± 4 | 79 ± 5 | 76 ± 8 | 74 ± 7 |
| CWI | 95 ± 19 | 110 ± 20 | 94 ± 6 | 85 ± 12 | 81 ± 4 | 89 ± 18 | 79 ± 10 | 76 ± 9 | 74 ± 8 | 76 ± 11 | 80 ± 11 | 78 ± 9 | 69 ± 9 | 73 ± 12 | |
|
| CON | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 5.0 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| CWI | 8.5 ± 2.0 | 9.7 ± 2.1 | 9.0 ± 1.6 | 8.8 ± 2.1 | 8.4 ± 2.1 | 8.8 ± 2.6 | 6.8 ± 1.8 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Pre Im | 5 min | 10 min | 2 min | 4 min | 6 min | 8 min | 10 min | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | |||||
| Subjective Shivering | CON | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | |||
| (AU) | CWI | 1 ± 0 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | |||
PreIm, Pre Immersion; AU, arbitrary units.
Values are mean ± SD. A main effect for condition and time along with a significant interaction between condition and time was found for (P < 0.05).
Significant difference from pre‐immersion (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Rectal temperature (°C) (a), thigh skin temperature (°C) (b), and deep muscle temperature (3 cm; °C) (c) during immersion and the 3 h post‐exercise period. *Significantly different from pre‐. #Significantly different from CON (n = 9 skin, n = 8 rectal, muscle; mean ± SD). Shaded area represents CWI.
Plasma‐derived metabolic and hormonal markers measured Pre‐Exercise, Post‐Exercise, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h following the cessation of exercise (n = 9 mean ± SD)
| Pre‐exercise | Post‐exercise | +1 h | +2 h | +3 h | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mmol·L−1) | CON | 5.50 ± 0.50 | 6.15 ± 0.37 | 5.28 ± 0.32 | 5.20 ± 0.52 | 5.29 ± 0.36 |
| CWI | 5.77 ± 0.57 | 6.06 ± 0.89 | 5.30 ± 0.85 | 5.25 ± 0.85 | 5.32 ± 0.76 | |
| Lactate (mmol·L−1) | CON | 1.41 ± 0.40 | 8.23 ± 3.97 | 1.86 ± 0.94 | 1.32 ± 0.44 | 1.36 ± 0.47 |
| CWI | 1.68 ± 0.69 | 7.47 ± 3.42 | 2.78 ± 1.55 | 1.75 ± 0.65 | 1.44 ± 0.38 | |
| NEFA (mmol·L−1) | CON | 0.60 ± 0.24 | 0.83 ± 0.26 | 1.39 ± 0.23 | 1.44 ± 0.35 | 1.49 ± 0.43 |
| CWI | 0.65 ± 0.24 | 0.87 ± 0.38 | 1.64 ± 0.29 | 1.39 ± 0.33 | 1.50 ± 0.29 | |
| Glycerol (μmol·L−1) | CON | 44.94 ± 23.70 | 290.22 ± 99.92 | 120.78 ± 51.52 | 114.63 ± 50.00 | 102.36 ± 45.79 |
| CWI | 41.11 ± 22.02 | 273.81 ± 52.52 | 155.36 ± 38.32 | 116.00 ± 52.46 | 97.21 ± 30.75 | |
| Insulin (U·mL−1) | CON | 12.88 ± 6.86 | 11.55 ± 3.06 | 13.50 ± 4.08 | 12.55 ± 4.68 | 12.79 ± 6.47 |
| CWI | 14.04 ± 5.02 | 10.32 ± 4.02 | 11.61 ± 5.67 | 11.57 ± 3.61 | 6.53 ± 1.17 | |
| Normetanephrine (pmol·L−1) | CON | 699.81 ± 197.68 | 1728.39 ± 481.09 | 914.39 ± 275.69 | 738.82 ± 247.92 | 634.93 ± 204.63 |
| CWI | 553.09 ± 237.16 | 1883.33 ± 655.17 | 1128.64 ± 531.83 | 1033.08 ± 461.74 | 919.57 ± 371.43 | |
| Metanephrine (pmol·L−1) | CON | 263.94 ± 133.08 | 535.48 ± 145.29 | 305.63 ± 98.15 | 272.43 ± 49.25 | 232.32 ± 72.05 |
| CWI | 245.67 ± 80.04 | 506.73 ± 149.39 | 321.30 ± 88.33 | 258.46 ± 75.54 | 268.76 ± 70.56 |
Significantly different from Pre‐exercise (P < 0.05).
Main interaction effect present (P = 0.026).
Figure 4PGC‐1α mRNA 2−ΔΔCT fold change in expression with the calibrator as preexercise and the reference gene as GAPDH (see methods for details). Values are mean ± SD. A time × condition interaction effect was observed (P = 0.034). * significantly greater than Pre‐ and Post‐Exercise (P < 0.001). asignificantly less than CON LOW (P < 0.05), bsignificantly greater than CON VLOW (P = 0.05), csignificantly less than CWI LOW (P = 0.019).
Figure 5mRNA 2−ΔΔCT fold change in expression with the calibrator as pre‐exercise and the reference gene as GAPDH (see methods for details). Values are mean ± SD.