Peter M Ten Klooster1,2,3, Martijn A H Oude Voshaar4,5, Walid Fakhouri6, Inmaculada de la Torre7, Claudia Nicolay8, Mart A F J van de Laar4,5,9. 1. Transparency in Healthcare, Hengelo, The Netherlands. P.M.tenKlooster@utwente.nl. 2. Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. P.M.tenKlooster@utwente.nl. 3. Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. P.M.tenKlooster@utwente.nl. 4. Transparency in Healthcare, Hengelo, The Netherlands. 5. Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 6. Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, Surrey, UK. 7. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 8. Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Bad Homburg, Germany. 9. Arthritis Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the long-term clinical, functional, and cost outcomes for early RA patients (symptoms < 1 year) who did or did not achieve early remission in a treat-to-target strategy. METHOD: Five-year data of 471 patients included in the DREAM remission induction cohort were used. Patients were treated according to a pre-specified 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission driven step-up treatment strategy starting with methotrexate, addition of sulfasalazine, and exchange of sulfasalazine for biological medication in case of failure. Two- and 3-year healthcare costs were available for selected subsamples of patients only. RESULTS: DAS28 remission was achieved in 27.7%, 38.2%, and 51.6% of patients at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Achieving DAS28 remission at 2, 3, or 6 months was consistently associated with significantly lower DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability scores at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up (all P values < 0.02). Patients in remission at 2, 3, or 6 months also had significantly lower medication costs per patient over the first 2 and 3 years of treatment, mainly due to lower biologic use, but differences in total healthcare resource costs (hospital admissions plus consultations) were less pronounced. Mean total medication and total healthcare resource costs at 3 years were €1131 and €1757 for patients in remission at 6 months vs. €7533 (P < 0.01) and €2202 (P = 0.09) for those not in remission. CONCLUSION: Achieving early remission was associated with beneficial clinical outcomes for early RA patients and lower costs in the long term. Key Points • Previous studies in rheumatoid arthritis patients have demonstrated that early good response is associated with sustained remission and better long-term clinical outcomes. • This study extents these findings by examining the long-term benefits of achieving early remission on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to treat-to-target principles. • The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that aiming for early remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients is beneficial in the long-term in terms of better clinical and functional outcomes and lower healthcare costs.
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the long-term clinical, functional, and cost outcomes for early RApatients (symptoms < 1 year) who did or did not achieve early remission in a treat-to-target strategy. METHOD: Five-year data of 471 patients included in the DREAM remission induction cohort were used. Patients were treated according to a pre-specified 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission driven step-up treatment strategy starting with methotrexate, addition of sulfasalazine, and exchange of sulfasalazine for biological medication in case of failure. Two- and 3-year healthcare costs were available for selected subsamples of patients only. RESULTS: DAS28 remission was achieved in 27.7%, 38.2%, and 51.6% of patients at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Achieving DAS28 remission at 2, 3, or 6 months was consistently associated with significantly lower DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability scores at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up (all P values < 0.02). Patients in remission at 2, 3, or 6 months also had significantly lower medication costs per patient over the first 2 and 3 years of treatment, mainly due to lower biologic use, but differences in total healthcare resource costs (hospital admissions plus consultations) were less pronounced. Mean total medication and total healthcare resource costs at 3 years were €1131 and €1757 for patients in remission at 6 months vs. €7533 (P < 0.01) and €2202 (P = 0.09) for those not in remission. CONCLUSION: Achieving early remission was associated with beneficial clinical outcomes for early RApatients and lower costs in the long term. Key Points • Previous studies in rheumatoid arthritispatients have demonstrated that early good response is associated with sustained remission and better long-term clinical outcomes. • This study extents these findings by examining the long-term benefits of achieving early remission on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to treat-to-target principles. • The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that aiming for early remission in rheumatoid arthritispatients is beneficial in the long-term in terms of better clinical and functional outcomes and lower healthcare costs.
Authors: S Saturni; F Bellini; F Braido; P Paggiaro; A Sanduzzi; N Scichilone; P A Santus; L Morandi; A Papi Journal: Pulm Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 3.410
Authors: Marloes Vermeer; Hillechiena H Kuper; Monique Hoekstra; Cees J Haagsma; Marcel D Posthumus; Herman L M Brus; Piet L C M van Riel; Mart A F J van de Laar Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-10
Authors: Marloes Vermeer; Wietske Kievit; Hillechiena H Kuper; Louise M A Braakman-Jansen; Hein J Bernelot Moens; Theo R Zijlstra; Alfons A den Broeder; Piet L C M van Riel; Jaap Fransen; Mart A F J van de Laar Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Carlo A Scirè; Mark Lunt; Tarnya Marshall; Deborah P M Symmons; Suzanne M M Verstappen Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Michaela A Stoffer; Monika M Schoels; Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Gerd Burmester; Vivian Bykerk; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Boulos Haraoui; Juan Gomez-Reino; Tore K Kvien; Peter Nash; Victoria Navarro-Compán; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Désirée van der Heijde; Tanja A Stamm Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian Bykerk; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Tore K Kvien; M Victoria Navarro-Compán; Susan Oliver; Monika Schoels; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Tanja Stamm; Michaela Stoffer; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Daniel Aletaha; Jose Louis Andreu; Martin Aringer; Martin Bergman; Neil Betteridge; Hans Bijlsma; Harald Burkhardt; Mario Cardiel; Bernard Combe; Patrick Durez; Joao Eurico Fonseca; Alan Gibofsky; Juan J Gomez-Reino; Winfried Graninger; Pekka Hannonen; Boulos Haraoui; Marios Kouloumas; Robert Landewe; Emilio Martin-Mola; Peter Nash; Mikkel Ostergaard; Andrew Östör; Pam Richards; Tuulikki Sokka-Isler; Carter Thorne; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Martinus de Wit; Desirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Désirée van der Heijde; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil; Daniel Aletaha; Clifton O Bingham; Gerd R Burmester; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; David Felson; Rachel Knevel; Tore K Kvien; Robert B M Landewé; Cédric Lukas; Iain McInnes; Alan J Silman; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Angela Zink; Bernard Combe Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-02-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Marloes Vermeer; Hillechiena H Kuper; Hein J Bernelot Moens; Monique Hoekstra; Marcel D Posthumus; Piet L C M van Riel; Mart A F J van de Laar Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 5.156