Literature DB >> 31161289

Effects of totally extraperitoneal and lichtenstein hernia repair on men's sexual function and quality of life.

Riza Gurhan Isil1, Omer Avlanmis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the literature, there have been scant studies that compare the effects of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein hernia (LH) repairs on men's sexual function and quality of life. Our aim in this study was to study the sexual function of men after TEP and LH repair according to SF 36 (Health Survey Scoring Demonstration) and IIEF (The International Index of Erectile Function).
METHODS: A total of 176 men with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups. Group T (n = 88) received TEP hernia repair, and Group L (n:88) received LH repair. Patients' demographics and perioperative findings were recorded. For all patients, the preoperative as well as postoperative 7th, 30th and 90th day SF 36 and IIEF were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 176 operations consisting of 88 TEP and 88 LH repairs were evaluated. There were no differences in demographics, hernia type, and complications except for body mass index (BMI). The operative time was higher in Group T (29.6 ± 5.8 vs. 43.5 ± 5.7 min; p = 0.001). The averages of the SF 36-Vitality and Social Function for Postoperative (PO) 30th day scores were higher in Group T. The averages of the SF 36-Bodily Pain, General Health, Physical Role, Emotional Role for PO 7-30th days SF36- Mental Health for PO 7th day and SF 36 Physical Function for PO 30-90th days scores were statistically higher in Group T. The averages of the IIEF- Erectile Function for PO 30th day, IIEF- Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Intercourse Satisfaction, and Intercourse Satisfaction for PO 7th and 30th days scores were higher in Group T.
CONCLUSIONS: TEP and LH repairs have similar results for recurrence, complications, and hospital stay; otherwise, TEP repair yields better results than the LH repair in the postoperative course at the 7th and 30th day evaluation, concerning sexual function and quality of life, but this benefit is no longer apparent at the 90th day. Although the short-term differences were statistically significant, they were moderate and might have a limited impact from the clinical point of view.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopic hernia repair; Lichtenstein hernia repair; Men’s sexual functions; Totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161289     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Dysejaculation after laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study.

Authors:  Joakim M Bischoff; Gitte Linderoth; Eske Kvanner Aasvang; Mads U Werner; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; C Jenkinson; A Coulter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Hasan H Eker; Hester R Langeveld; Pieter J Klitsie; Martijne van't Riet; Laurents P S Stassen; Wibo F Weidema; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan F Lange; Hendrik J Bonjer; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03

4.  Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hester R Langeveld; Martijne van't Riet; Wibo F Weidema; Laurents P S Stassen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan Lange; Hendrik J Bonjer; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; A Montgomery; L Bergkvist; C Rudberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The effect of chronic constipation on the development of inguinal herniation.

Authors:  A Kartal; M Yalcın; B Citgez; A Uzunkoy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Surgery for chronic inguinodynia following routine herniorrhaphy: beneficial effects on dysejaculation.

Authors:  T Verhagen; M J A Loos; M R M Scheltinga; R M H Roumen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003.

Authors:  Ira M Rutkow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of life after laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: spinal vs general anesthesia.

Authors:  C Sarakatsianou; I Baloyiannis; K Perivoliotis; S Georgopoulou; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.739

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.