Literature DB >> 31161242

[Techniques to increase pedicle screw stability in osteoporotic vertebrae].

Lukas Weiser1, Stephan Sehmisch2, Wolfgang Lehmann2, Lennart Viezens2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Operative stabilisation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. INDICATIONS: Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. CONTRAINDICATIONS: None. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative determination of expected bone mineral density. Implantation of pedicle screws in special trajectories, cement augmentation of the screws and use of alternative implants. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional mobilisation and initiation of osteoporosis therapy if indicated.
RESULTS: A biomechanical cadaver study with human vertebral bodies was performed. There was a highly significant correlation between bone mineral density and the fatigue load (r2 = 0.839, p < 0.001). Specimens with bone mineral density below 80 mg/cm3 only reached 60% of the fatigue load compared to the specimens with adequate bone quality (>120 mg/cm3) and therefore stability mightbe insufficient and an additional stabilisation should be considered. In osteoporotic vertebrae, the fatigue strength of cement augmented screws was increased by 52% compared to the non-augmented screws (fatigue load non-augmented: 173 N, augmented: 263 N; p = 0.001). Studies conducted by other research groups have demonstrated the effect of various screw trajectories and alternative implants to improve stability in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fracture; Pedicle screw; Spine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161242     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-019-0608-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Schleifenbaum; C Pfeifle; C Oefner; M Edel; N von der Höh; C-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs.

Authors:  Ahmet Karakaşlı; Nihat Acar; R Buğra Hüsemoğlu
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021

3.  Osteoporotic burst fracture-clinical, radiological and functional outcome of three-column reconstruction using single posterior approach (Instrumentation, Corpectomy, Arthroscope Assisted Transpedicular Decompression and Mesh Cage).

Authors:  Ghanshyam Kakadiya; Viraj Gandbhir; Yogesh Soni; Kushal Gohil; Akash Shakya
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Time to revisit contraindications of vertebroplasty- A retrospective study of osteoporotic burst fracture operated with vertebroplasty and short segment fixation.

Authors:  Deepak Joshi; Ghanshyam Kakadiya; Umair Attar
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-03-16

5.  Outcome after Posterior Vertebral Column Resection in Patients with Severe Osteoporotic Fractures-A Retrospective Analysis from Two Centers.

Authors:  Leon-Gordian Koepke; Lukas Weiser; Martin Stangenberg; Marc Dreimann; Annika Heuer; André Strahl; Lennart Viezens
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  How relevant is lumbar bone mineral density for the stability of symphyseal implants? A biomechanical cadaver study.

Authors:  Fanny Schwaabe; Johannes Gleich; Christoph Linhart; Alexander Martin Keppler; Matthias Woiczinski; Christian Kammerlander; Axel Greiner; Wolfgang Böcker; Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.