BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term studies to disentangle the multiple, simultaneous effects of global change on community dynamics are a high research priority to forecast future distribution of diversity. Seldom are such multiple effects of global change studied across different ecosystems. METHODS: Here we manipulated nitrogen deposition and rainfall at levels realistic for future environmental scenarios in three contrasting steppe types in Mongolia and followed community dynamics for 7 years. KEY RESULTS: Redundancy analyses showed that community composition varied significantly among years. Rainfall and nitrogen manipulations did have some significant effects, but these effects were dependent on the type of response and varied between ecosystems. Community compositions of desert and meadow steppes, but not that of typical steppe, responded significantly to rainfall addition. Only community composition of meadow steppe responded significantly to nitrogen deposition. Species richness in desert steppe responded significantly to rainfall addition, but the other two steppes did not. Typical steppe showed significant negative response of species richness to nitrogen deposition, but the other two steppes did not. There were significant interactions between year and nitrogen deposition in desert steppe and between year and rainfall addition in typical steppe, suggesting that the effect of the treatments depends on the particular year considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our multi-year experiment thus suggests that responses of community structure and diversity to global change drivers are ecosystem-dependent and that their responses to experimental treatments are dwarfed by the year-to-year community dynamics. Therefore, our results point to the importance of taking annual environmental variability into account for understanding and predicting the specific responses of different ecosystems to multiple global change drivers.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term studies to disentangle the multiple, simultaneous effects of global change on community dynamics are a high research priority to forecast future distribution of diversity. Seldom are such multiple effects of global change studied across different ecosystems. METHODS: Here we manipulated nitrogen deposition and rainfall at levels realistic for future environmental scenarios in three contrasting steppe types in Mongolia and followed community dynamics for 7 years. KEY RESULTS: Redundancy analyses showed that community composition varied significantly among years. Rainfall and nitrogen manipulations did have some significant effects, but these effects were dependent on the type of response and varied between ecosystems. Community compositions of desert and meadow steppes, but not that of typical steppe, responded significantly to rainfall addition. Only community composition of meadow steppe responded significantly to nitrogen deposition. Species richness in desert steppe responded significantly to rainfall addition, but the other two steppes did not. Typical steppe showed significant negative response of species richness to nitrogen deposition, but the other two steppes did not. There were significant interactions between year and nitrogen deposition in desert steppe and between year and rainfall addition in typical steppe, suggesting that the effect of the treatments depends on the particular year considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our multi-year experiment thus suggests that responses of community structure and diversity to global change drivers are ecosystem-dependent and that their responses to experimental treatments are dwarfed by the year-to-year community dynamics. Therefore, our results point to the importance of taking annual environmental variability into account for understanding and predicting the specific responses of different ecosystems to multiple global change drivers.
Authors: O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall Journal: Science Date: 2000-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Travis E Huxman; Melinda D Smith; Philip A Fay; Alan K Knapp; M Rebecca Shaw; Michael E Loik; Stanley D Smith; David T Tissue; John C Zak; Jake F Weltzin; William T Pockman; Osvaldo E Sala; Brent M Haddad; John Harte; George W Koch; Susan Schwinning; Eric E Small; David G Williams Journal: Nature Date: 2004-06-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Katharine N Suding; Scott L Collins; Laura Gough; Christopher Clark; Elsa E Cleland; Katherine L Gross; Daniel G Milchunas; Steven Pennings Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Javier Calvo-Fernández; Ángela Taboada; Andreas Fichtner; Werner Härdtle; Leonor Calvo; Elena Marcos Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: W Stanley Harpole; Jacqueline T Ngai; Elsa E Cleland; Eric W Seabloom; Elizabeth T Borer; Matthew E S Bracken; James J Elser; Daniel S Gruner; Helmut Hillebrand; Jonathan B Shurin; Jennifer E Smith Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 9.492