| Literature DB >> 31161089 |
Sony Das1, Abhijit Mukherjee2, Sanjay Mallick3, Sharmistha Bhattacherjee2, Sumanta Chakraborty2, Samir Dasgupta2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Helminths infestations are common in children in the tea garden areas of Darjeeling, which present unique social, cultural, and environmental conditions. The present study was conducted to determine the proportion of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infestations and association of STH to sociodemographic variables among children attending Integrated Child Development Services centers of a tea garden area in Darjeeling.Entities:
Keywords: Children; helminth; tea garden
Year: 2019 PMID: 31161089 PMCID: PMC6542304 DOI: 10.4103/tp.TP_55_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Parasitol ISSN: 2229-5070
Relative prevalence of Ascaris in stool samples as reported by different studies
| Name of author (year) | Total parasite prevalence | Prevalence of |
|---|---|---|
| Present study (2016)a | 9.6 | 7.7 |
| Kumar | 49.38 | 46.88 |
| Wani and Ahmad 2009a[ | 73.36 | 69.84 |
| Kumar CS | 71.73 | 23.73 |
| Bisht | 38.2 | 6.25 |
| Shrestha 2001b[ | 81.94 | 72.62 |
| Khanal | 17.6 | 3.52 |
| Singh | 15.17 | 5.72 |
| Gunawardena | 29.04 | 24.44 |
aStudies conducted in India, bStudies conducted in Nepal, cStudies conducted in Sri Lanka. Adopted from Kumar et al.[
Prevalence of soil transmitted helminth infestations
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| Prevalence of helminth infestation | |
| STH combined | 5 (9.6) |
| Ascaris lumbrocoides | 4 (7.7) |
| Trichuris trichiura | 1 (1.9) |
STH: Soil transmitted helminth
Distribution and comparisons of characteristics between worm positive and worm negative children (n=52)
| Variables | Total, | Worm positive, | Worm negative, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||||
| 0-1 | 8 (15.4) | 0 (0) | 8 (100) | 0.296 |
| 1-2 | 7 (13.5) | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | |
| 2-3 | 9 (17.3) | 1 (11.1) | 8 (88.9) | |
| 3-4 | 10 (19.2) | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | |
| 4-5 | 10 (19.2) | 2 (20) | 8 (80) | |
| 5-6 | 8 (15.4) | 2 (25) | 6 (75) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 32 (61.5) | 2 (6.3) | 30 (93.7) | 0.298 |
| Male | 20 (38.5) | 3 (15) | 17 (85) | |
| ICDS center | ||||
| Center 1 | 13 (25) | 0 (0) | 13 (100) | 0.352 |
| Center 2 | 28 (53.8) | 4 (14.3) | 24 (85.7) | |
| Center 3 | 11 (21.2) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
| Economic status (Rs.)# | ||||
| <2000 | 4 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | 0.788 |
| 2000-4000 | 30 (57.7) | 3 (10) | 27 (90) | |
| ≥4000 | 18 (34.6) | 2 (11.1) | 16 (89.9) | |
| Educational qualification of mother## | ||||
| No formal education | 39 (75) | 5 (12.8) | 34 (87.2) | 0.764 |
| Primary (standards 1-4) | 3 (5.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | |
| Upper primary (standards 5-7) | 3 (5.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | |
| Lower secondary (standards 8-10) | 4 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
| Higher secondary (standards 11-12) | 3 (5.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | |
| Presence of sanitary toilet in house | ||||
| Yes | 33 (63.5) | 4 (12.1) | 29 (87.9) | 0.419 |
| No | 19 (33.5) | 1 (5.3) | 18 (94.7) | |
| Usual practice of handwashing with soap after defecation$ | ||||
| Yes | 36 (69.2) | 4 (11.1) | 32 (89.9) | 0.583 |
| No | 21 (30.8) | 1 (6.3) | 15 (93.7) | |
| Usual practice of handwashing with soap before eating | ||||
| Yes | 31 (59.6) | 1 (6.3) | 30 (93.7) | 0.758 |
| No | 21 (40.4) | 4 (15) | 17 (85) | |
| Child wearing footwear at the time of visit to the house/ICDS center$$ | ||||
| Yes | 27 (51.9) | 3 (11.1) | 24 (89.9) | 0.65 |
| No | 18 (34.6) | 2 (11.1) | 16 (89.9) | |
| Not applicable | 7 (13.5) | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | |
| Nails of the hand trimmed at the time of examination of the child | ||||
| Yes | 24 (46.2) | 2 (8.3) | 22 (81.7) | 0.771 |
| No | 28 (63.8) | 3 (10.7) | 25 (89.3) |
#One family had no income for the last 6 months, Two families had income in the range of Rs. 30,000-35,000 per month, ##Primary/secondary education in India is segregated as Primary (1st standard-4th standard), upper primary (5th standard-7th standard), lower secondary (8th standard-10th standard), and higher secondary (11th and 12th standard) $Usual practice was obtained from interviews with the mother and the ICDS caregivers. In children fed by the mothers handwashing practices of the mother was asked during the interview. In children cleaned by the mothers after defecation, the practice of the mother regarding handwashing was asked, $$Children <1 year old who had not learned to walk, ^In the cells where the expected values were <5, Fisher’s exact test was used. ICDS: Integrated Child Development Services
Additional yield of worms in samples with concentration techniques
| Technique | Ascaris lumbricoides | Trichuris trichiura |
|---|---|---|
| Direct methods | ||
| Detected by normal saline and iodine | 1 | 1 |
| Concentration techniques | ||
| Additional detection over normal saline and iodine by zinc sulfate floatation technique | 1 | 0 |
| Additional yield over normal saline and iodine by formalin-ether sedimentation technique | 3 | 0 |