BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of hospital surgical volume on the rate of complete gross resection for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary debulking surgery. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients undergoing between 2010 and 2014 for an advanced stage (III-IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. For analyses purposes facility surgical volume was divided into tertiles (high, intermediate and low). Patients with bulky stage III disease who underwent primary debulking surgery with known residual disease status were selected for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8894 patients with macroscopic peritoneal disease were included. Rates of complete gross resection for patients managed in low, intermediate and high-volume centers were 41.0%, 41.6% and 43.3% respectively (p = 0.20). After controlling for year of diagnosis, age, insurance status, presence of co-morbidities, histology, size of peritoneal implants, stage, and complexity of surgery, patients undergoing primary debulking surgery at low (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97, p = 0.013) and intermediate (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.99, p = 0.043) volume centers had a lower likelihood of achieving complete gross resection compared to those managed in high volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for multiple potential confounders, patients receiving surgery in high volume centers had a higher likelihood of complete gross resection following primary debulking surgery for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of hospital surgical volume on the rate of complete gross resection for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary debulking surgery. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients undergoing between 2010 and 2014 for an advanced stage (III-IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. For analyses purposes facility surgical volume was divided into tertiles (high, intermediate and low). Patients with bulky stage III disease who underwent primary debulking surgery with known residual disease status were selected for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8894 patients with macroscopic peritoneal disease were included. Rates of complete gross resection for patients managed in low, intermediate and high-volume centers were 41.0%, 41.6% and 43.3% respectively (p = 0.20). After controlling for year of diagnosis, age, insurance status, presence of co-morbidities, histology, size of peritoneal implants, stage, and complexity of surgery, patients undergoing primary debulking surgery at low (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97, p = 0.013) and intermediate (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.99, p = 0.043) volume centers had a lower likelihood of achieving complete gross resection compared to those managed in high volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for multiple potential confounders, patients receiving surgery in high volume centers had a higher likelihood of complete gross resection following primary debulking surgery for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
Authors: Deanna H Wong; Alexandra L Mardock; Erica N Manrriquez; Tiffany S Lai; Yas Sanaiha; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Peyman Benharash; Joshua G Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 3.240