Literature DB >> 31160062

Assessment of health systems guidance using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument.

Melissa C Brouwers1, John N Lavis2, Karen Spithoff3, Marija Vukmirovic4, Ivan D Florez5, Marcela Velez6, Mohammad Kibria7, Nigar Sekercioglu8, Elizabeth Kamler9, Jillian Halladay10, Jaspreet Sandhu11, Ahmednur Ali12, Anushka Jaffer13, Ruhi Kiflen14, Julia Pemberton15.   

Abstract

Health systems guidance (HSG) documents contain systematically developed statements or recommendations intended to address a health system challenge. The concept of HSG is fairly new and considerable effort has been undertaken to build tools to support the contextualization of recommendations. One example is the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS), created by international stakeholders and researchers, to assist in the development, reporting and evaluation of HSG. Here, we present the quality appraisal of 85 HSG documents published from 2012 to 2017 using the AGREE-HS. The AGREE-HS consists of five items (Topic, Participants, Methods, Recommendations, and Implementability), which are scored on a 7-point response scale (1=lowest quality; 7=highest quality). Overall, AGREE-HS item scores were highest for the 'Topic' and 'Recommendations' items (means above the mid-point of 4), while the 'Participants', 'Methods', and 'Implementability' items received lower scores. Documents without a specific health focus and those authored by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence group, achieved higher AGREE-HS overall scores than their comparators. No statistically significant changes in overall scores were observed over time. This is the first time that the AGREE-HS has been applied, providing a current quality status report of HSG and identifying where improvements in HSG development and reporting can be made.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health policy; Health systems; Health systems guidance; Health systems research; Quality appraisal

Year:  2019        PMID: 31160062     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  2 in total

1.  Strategies to adapt and implement health system guidelines and recommendations: a scoping review.

Authors:  Sydney Breneol; Janet A Curran; Robert Marten; Kirti Minocha; Catie Johnson; Helen Wong; Etienne V Langlois; Lori Wozney; C Marcela Vélez; Christine Cassidy; Sanjay Juvekar; Melissa Rothfus; Lydia Aziato; Lisa Keeping-Burke; Samuel Adjorlolo; Daniel F Patiño-Lugo
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 2.  Appraising Evidence-Based Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Guidelines-PART I: A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality Using AGREE-HS.

Authors:  Hans Te Brake; Andrea Willems; Charlie Steen; Michel Dückers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.