| Literature DB >> 31159775 |
Araya Mesfin Nigatu1, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye2, Degefie Tibebe Degefie3, Abraham Yeneneh Birhanu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Home delivery is the most frequent childbirth practice in Ethiopia and brings health risks for many mothers and their babies which in turn affecting the whole families. Characterizing the spatial variations and the associated factors of home deliveries after antenatal care visit is necessary to prioritize risks and facilitate geographically based interventions.Entities:
Keywords: ANC; Cluster; Home delivery; Northwest Ethiopia; Spatial variation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31159775 PMCID: PMC6545631 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7050-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Map of study area Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Socio-demographic characteristics of women in the Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
| Variables | Residence | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban ( | Rural ( | ||
| Age (in years) | |||
| < 20 | 4 (2.8) | 18 (4.7) | 22 (4.2) |
| 20–34 | 116 (81.1) | 276 (71.7) | 392 (74.2) |
| 35–49 | 23 (16.1) | 91 (23.6) | 114 (21.6) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 124 (86.7) | 360 (93.5) | 484 (91.7) |
| Single | 12 (8.4) | 12 (3.1) | 24 (4.6) |
| Othera | 7 (4.9) | 13 (3.4) | 20 (3.8) |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 93 (65.0) | 367 (95.3) | 460 (87.1) |
| Merchant | 18 (12.6) | 1 (0.3) | 19 (3.6) |
| Civil servant | 15 (10.5) | 3 (0.8) | 18 (3.4) |
| Daily laborer | 8 (5.6) | 6 (1.5) | 14 (2.7) |
| Student | 7 (4.9) | 6 (1.5) | 13 (2.5) |
| Farmer | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.4) |
| Otherb | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.4) |
| Education | |||
| Unable to read and write | 24 (16.8) | 219 (56.9) | 243 (46.0) |
| Able to read and write | 8 (5.6) | 32 (8.3) | 40 (7.6) |
| Primary school (1–8) | 39 (27.3) | 105 (27.3) | 144 (27.3) |
| Secondary school (9–12) | 50 (34.9) | 27 (7.0) | 77 (14.6) |
| College and above | 22 (15.4) | 2 (0.5) | 24 (4.50 |
| Religion | |||
| Orthodox | 130 (91) | 381 (98.9) | 511 (96.8) |
| Muslim | 10 (6.9) | 4 (1.0) | 14 (2.6) |
| Protestant | 3 (2.0) | 0 | 3 (0.6) |
| Wealth Index | |||
| Poor | 46 (26.1) | 130 (73.9) | 176 (33.3) |
| Medium | 32 (30.2) | 74 (69.8) | 106 (20.1) |
| Rich | 65 (26.4) | 181 (73.6) | 246 (46.6) |
othera = Separated, widowed, divorced
otherb = retired, unemployed
Fig. 2Place of delivery and reasons for home delivery in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Fig. 3Home delivery attendants by residence in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Obstetric and location characteristics of women in the Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
| Variables | Residence | Total N | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban ( | Rural ( | ||
| ANC visits | |||
| 1 | 7 (4.9) | 67 (17.4) | 74 (14.0) |
| 2–3 | 64 (44.8) | 178 (46.2) | 242 (45.8) |
| | 72 (50.3) | 140 (36.4) | 212 (40.2) |
| Gravidity | |||
| 1 | 39 (27.3) | 72 (18.7) | 111 (21) |
| 2–4 | 92 (64.3) | 225 (58.4) | 316 (59.9) |
| | 12 (8.4) | 88 (22.9) | 101 (19.1) |
| Parity | |||
| 1 | 39 (27.3) | 72 (18.7) | 111 (21) |
| 2–4 | 92 (64.3) | 228 (59.2) | 320 (60.6) |
| | 12 (8.4) | 88 (22.9) | 97 (18.4) |
| Distance from the nearest HF | |||
| < =2.5 km | 143 (100) | 151 (39.2) | 294 (55.7) |
| 2.51–5 km | 0 | 197 (51.2) | 197 (37.3) |
| > 5 km | 0 | 37 (9.6) | 37 (7) |
| Distance from the nearest HEW residence | |||
| < =2.5 km | 132 (92.3) | 237 (61.6) | 369 (69.9) |
| 2.51–5 km | 11 (7.7) | 132 (34.3) | 143 (27.1) |
| > 5 km | 0 | 16 (4.1) | 16 (3.0) |
HF Health facility, HEW Health Extension Worker
Fig. 4Means of transportations to reach health facilities in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Behavioral characteristics of women and their source of information in the Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
| Variables | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Source of information about ANC | ||
| Health institution by health care workers | 215 | 40.7 |
| Health extension workers | 162 | 30.7 |
| Radio/Television | 74 | 14.0 |
| Relatives and friends | 77 | 14.6 |
| Received health education during ANC visit | ||
| Yes | 106 | 20.0 |
| No | 191 | 36.2 |
| Do not remember | 231 | 43.8 |
| Benefit of ANC | ||
| Both for mother’s and child’s health | 284 | 53.8 |
| For a child’s health | 184 | 34.8 |
| For mother’s health | 60 | 11.4 |
| The decision on the place of delivery | ||
| Both wife and husband | 413 | 78.2 |
| Wife only | 82 | 15.5 |
| Husband only | 33 | 6.3 |
| Is there a difference of giving birth at health facility instead of home? | ||
| Yes | 340 | 64.4 |
| No | 12 | 2.3 |
| I don’t know | 176 | 33.3 |
Fig. 5Women’s residence, health facilities and health extension worker’s location in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Fig. 6Buffer analysis map for women’s place of delivery in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Fig. 7Kernel density analysis map for women’ place of delivery in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Fig. 8Cluster detection analysis of home delivery in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Significant clusters for home delivery in the Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
| Type of cluster | Total # of population | Total # of cases | RR | Cases(%) | LLR | Radius (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most likely cluster* | 22 | 22 | 2 | 100 | 14.5 | 1.4 |
| Secondary cluster* | 28 | 25 | 1.8 | 89.3 | 9.2 | 4.4 |
| Secondary cluster* | 37 | 31 | 1.7 | 83.8 | 8.5 | 4.2 |
*Primary cluster at p < 0.001; *Secondary cluster at p < 0.05
LLR log likelihood ratio, RR relative risks
Fig. 9Local Moran’s I for women’s home delivery in Lay Gayint district, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
Bivariable and multivariable analysis of home delivery in the Lay Gayint, Northwest Ethiopia; 2016
| Variables | Place of delivery | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | HF | |||
| Distance from HF location | ||||
| < =2.5 km | 124 (42.2) | 170 (57.8) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2.51–5 km | 128 (65) | 69 (35) | 2.5 (1.8, 3.7)* | 1.1 (0.6, 2.1) |
| > =5 km | 26 (70.3) | 11 (29.7) | 3.2 (1.5, 6.8)* | 1.2 (0.3, 3.9) |
| Distance from the nearest HEW home | ||||
| < =2.5 km | 168 (45.8) | 199 (54.2) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2.51–5 km | 97 (67.8) | 46 (32.2) | 2.5 (1.6, 3.7)* | 2.2 (1.2, 4.3)** |
| > =5 km | 13 (72.2) | 5 (27.8) | 3.1 (1.1, 8.8)* | 1.4 (0.3, 7.0) |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban | 29 (20.3) | 114 (79.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Rural | 249 (64.7) | 136 (35.3) | 7.2 (4.6, 11.4)* | 3.8 (1.3, 10.9)*** |
| Age | ||||
| < 20 | 10 (45.5) | 12 (54.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 20–34 | 199 (50.8) | 193 (49.2) | 1.2 (0.5, 2.9) | 1.1 (0.3, 4.6) |
| > =35 | 69 (60.5) | 45 (39.5) | 1.8 (0.7, 4.6) | 0.8 (0.2, 3.8) |
| Level of education | ||||
| Unable to read and write | 159 (64.4) | 88 (35.6) | 12.7 (3.4, 43.6)* | 0.3 (0.1, 1.7) |
| Able to read and write | 21 (52.5) | 19 (47.5) | 7.7 (1.9, 30.1)* | 0.2 (0.0, 1.6) |
| Primary (1–8) | 76 (54.3) | 64 (45.7) | 8.3 (2.4, 29.1)* | 0.7 (0.1, 3.7) |
| Secondary (9–12) | 19 (24.7) | 58 (75.3) | 2.3 (0.6, 8.5) | 0.7 (0.1, 3.7) |
| College and above | 3 (12.5) | 21 (87.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Source of information for ANC | ||||
| Health institution | 119 (55.3) | 96 (44.7) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.8)* | 0.3 (0.1, 0.8)** |
| HEW | 82 (50.6) | 80 (49.4) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)* | 0.4 (0.2, 1.1) |
| Radio/TV | 21 (28.4) | 53 (71.6) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3)* | 0.4 (0.1, 1.2) |
| Friends and relatives | 56 (72.7) | 21 (27.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Benefit of ANC | ||||
| Maternal health | 50 (83.3) | 10 (16.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Child health | 134 (72.8) | 50 (27.2) | 0.5 (0.3, 1.1) | 1.1 (0.4, 2.9) |
| Both mother and child | 94 (33.1) | 190 (66.9) | 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)* | 0.4 (0.1, 1.0) |
| ANC visits | ||||
| 1 visit | 70 (88.6) | 9 (11.4) | 18.6 (8.7, 39.6)* | 6.2 (1.9, 19.3)*** |
| 2–3 visits | 147 (60.7) | 95 (39.3) | 3.7 (2.5, 5.5)* | 2.0 (1.1, 3.4)** |
| ≥ 4visits | 61 (29.5) | 146 (70.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Health education | ||||
| Yes | 34 (32.1) | 72 (67.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| No | 131 (68.6) | 60 (31.4) | 4.6 (2.7, 7.7)* | 3.5 (1.6, 7.7)*** |
| I don’t know | 113 (48.9) | 118 (51.1) | 1.0 (1.252, 3.286)* | 2.7 (1.3, 5.7)** |
| A decision on the place of delivery | ||||
| Myself | 68 (82.9) | 14 (17.1) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| My husband | 18 (54.5) | 15 (45.5) | 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) | 0.3 (0.1, 1.2) |
| Both of us | 192 (46.5) | 221 (53.5) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3)* | 0.3 (0.1, 0.9)** |
| Knowledge on place of delivery | ||||
| Yes | 104 (30.6) | 236 (69.4) | 0.04 (0, 0.1)* | 0.04 (0.0, 0.1)*** |
| No | 174 (92.6) | 14 (7.4) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Gravidity | ||||
| 1 | 41 (36.9) | 70 (63.1) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2–4 | 176 (55.6) | 140 (44.3) | 2.2 (1.4, 3.3)* | 0.4 (0.1, 1.1) |
| | 61 (60.4) | 40 (39.6) | 261 (1.5, 4.5)* | 0.4 (0.0, 6.5) |
| Parity | ||||
| 1 | 41 (50) | 41 (50) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2–4 | 179 (55.9) | 141 (44.1) | 2.2 (1.4, 3.4)* | 2.2 (0.1, 35.7) |
| | 58 (59.8) | 39 (40.2) | 2.5 (1.5, 4.4)* | 1.9 (0.9, 8.3) |
| Wealth Index | ||||
| Poor | 50 (27) | 135 (73) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) | 0.3 (0.1, 1.0) |
| Medium | 190 (66.4) | 96 (33.4) | 1.0 (0.5, 1.8) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.9) |
| Rich | 38 (66.7) | 19 (33.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of fit test = 0.325
HF Health facility, HEW Health Extension Worker, COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio
*p-value ≤0.05 for bivariable analysis
**p-value< 0.05 and ***p-value < 0.001 for multivariable analysis, 1.0 = reference;