Literature DB >> 3115966

Comparative studies of two types of acid proteases from rat gastric mucosa and spleen.

N Muto1, M Yamamoto, S Tani.   

Abstract

Two types of acid proteases, cathepsin D and cathepsin E-like enzyme, from rat gastric mucosa and spleen were compared in their biochemical and immunochemical properties. The enzymes were partially purified by employing the same chromatographic procedures and they showed a single proteolytically active band in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Two low molecular weight enzymes, cathepsins D, from both tissues showed the same molecular weight and the same sensitivities to various inhibitors, but slightly different electrophoretic mobilities. The rabbit antiserum raised against gastric mucosa cathepsin D precipitated both enzymes. On the other hand, high molecular weight enzymes, gastric mucosa cathepsin D-like acid proteinase and spleen cathepsin E-like acid proteinase, were similar to each other as judged by their chromatographic profiles, electrophoretic mobilities, and high stabilities in urea solution. Furthermore, the antiserum specific to gastric mucosa cathepsin D-like acid proteinase inhibited both enzyme activities in a similar manner. However, the antiserum specific to one type of enzyme did not react with the other type. These results indicate that: gastric mucosa cathepsin D is immunologically identical with spleen cathepsin D; gastric mucosa cathepsin D-like acid proteinase has biochemical and immunological properties quite similar to spleen cathepsin E-like enzyme; these two types of acid proteases are quite different proteins existing in the individual tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3115966     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a121971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biochem        ISSN: 0021-924X            Impact factor:   3.387


  3 in total

1.  Identification of the aspartic proteinases from human erythrocyte membranes and gastric mucosa (slow-moving proteinase) as catalytically equivalent to cathepsin E.

Authors:  R A Jupp; A D Richards; J Kay; B M Dunn; J B Wyckoff; I M Samloff; K Yamamoto
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Immunohistochemically demonstrated variation in expression of cathepsin E between uracil-induced papillomatosis and N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine-induced preneoplastic and neoplastic changes in rat urinary bladder.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Yonezawa; M Ichinose; K Miki; T Masui; S Fukushima; H Inoue; M Tatematsu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Natural cathepsin E deficiency in the immune system of C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Calogero Tulone; Jhen Tsang; Zofia Prokopowicz; Nicholas Grosvenor; Benny Chain
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 3.330

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.