Literature DB >> 31158556

Is frontal gait a myth in normal pressure hydrocephalus?

Eric Morel1, Stéphane Armand2, Frédéric Assal3, Gilles Allali4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) are considered to present a magnetic, slow, wide-based gait, also called frontal gait. However, this gait profile is not specific for iNPH and encountered in patients with other neurological conditions mimicking iNPH (i.e. iNPH mimics), such as vascular dementia. We aimed to characterize the gait profiles in iNPH and their mimics and to compare the prevalence of clinical gait abnormalities between both groups.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 140 patients suspected of iNPH (76.3 ± 6.8 yo; 30.7% female). Eighty patients (57.1%) were diagnosed with iNPH according to the NPH consensus guidelines criteria; the remaining sixty patients were classified as mimics (23 neurodegenerative conditions, 12 multifactorial conditions, 9 vascular dementia, 7 mixed dementias, 6 toxic conditions, 2 psychiatric conditions, and 1 stroke). Two independent diagnosis-blinded clinicians (kappa, 0.73) evaluated gait according to four categories: frontal gait, parkinsonian gait, other clinical gait abnormalities, and normal gait.
RESULTS: iNPH patients and mimics shared similar clinical characteristics. Frontal gait occurred in only 26% of patients (with a similar prevalence for the mimics). Parkinsonian gait was significantly more prevalent among the mimics (32% versus 15%; p-value: 0.032). This association between parkinsonian gait and mimics remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities and white matter changes (OR: 2.404; 95% CI: [1.03-5.64]; p value: 0.044).
CONCLUSION: Frontal gait is not the most prevalent gait abnormality in iNPH and does not discriminate iNPH from its mimics. Parkinsonian gait is more prevalent among the mimics.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dementia; Frontal gait; Gait disorders; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Parkinsonism

Year:  2019        PMID: 31158556     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  7 in total

1.  Gait apraxia evaluation in normal pressure hydrocephalus using inertial sensors. Clinical correlates, ventriculoperitoneal shunt outcomes, and tap-test predictive capacity.

Authors:  Alberto Ferrari; David Milletti; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Giulia Giannini; Sabina Cevoli; Elena Magelli; Luca Albini-Riccioli; Paolo Mantovani; Pietro Cortelli; Lorenzo Chiari; Giorgio Palandri
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Dynamic functional networks in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Alterations and reversibility by CSF tap test.

Authors:  Alessandra Griffa; Giulia Bommarito; Frédéric Assal; François R Herrmann; Dimitri Van De Ville; Gilles Allali
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Usefulness of Brain Positron Emission Tomography with Different Tracers in the Evaluation of Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalous.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Mattoli; Giorgio Treglia; Maria Lucia Calcagni; Annunziato Mangiola; Carmelo Anile; Gianluca Trevisi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Motor skills, cognitive impairment, and quality of life in normal pressure hydrocephalus: early effects of shunt placement.

Authors:  Matthias Hülser; Hannah Spielmann; Joachim Oertel; Christoph Sippl
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Quantitative gait analysis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using deep learning algorithms on monocular videos.

Authors:  Sungmoon Jeong; Hosang Yu; Jaechan Park; Kyunghun Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus and CSF tap test response: the gait phenotype matters.

Authors:  Eric Morel; Stéphane Armand; Frédéric Assal; Gilles Allali
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  There is more to NPH than lower body Parkinsonism.

Authors:  Joachim M K Oertel; Matthias J M Huelser
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.216

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.