Literature DB >> 31158078

The Role of Ablation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Small Renal Masses.

Maciej Salagierski1, Adrianna Wojciechowska2, Kinga Zając2, Tobias Klatte3, R Houston Thompson4, Jeffrey A Cadeddu5, Jihad Kaouk6, Riccardo Autorino7, Kamran Ahrar8, Umberto Capitanio9.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Nephron-sparing approaches are increasingly recommended for incidental small renal masses. Herein, we review the current literature regarding the safety and efficacy of focal therapy, including percutaneous ablation, for small renal masses.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the application of ablative therapy in the management of small renal masses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for findings published since 2000 on focal therapy for small renal masses. After literature review, 64 articles were selected and discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy are the most widely used procedures with intermediate-term oncological outcome comparable with surgical series. Cost effectiveness seems excellent and side effects appear acceptable. To date, no randomized trial comparing percutaneous focal therapy with standard surgical approach or active surveillance has been performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy. Percutaneous ablation has fewer complications and a better postoperative profile when compared with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryoablation; Focal therapy; Radiofrequency ablation; Renal; Tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31158078     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  5 in total

1.  Percutaneous kidney ablation: a good option in selected cases.

Authors:  Samuel Weprin; Alessandro Veccia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Transforming Commercial Copper Sulfide into Injectable Hydrogels for Local Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoran Wang; Zizhen Yang; Zhaowei Meng; Shao-Kai Sun
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Modern Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma- Is Ablation Part of the Equation?

Authors:  Zev Leopold; Rachel Passarelli; Mark Mikhail; Alexandra Tabakin; Kevin Chua; Ronald D Ennis; John Nosher; Eric A Singer
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2022-08-15

4.  Comparison of three dimensional reconstruction and conventional computer tomography angiography in patients undergoing zero-ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Xiaorong Wu; Chen Jiang; Guangyu Wu; Chao Shen; Qibo Fu; Yonghui Chen; Dongming Liu; Wei Xue
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 5.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.