Literature DB >> 31158012

ACO Serious Illness Care: Survey And Case Studies Depict Current Challenges And Future Opportunities.

William K Bleser1, Robert S Saunders2, Lia Winfield3, Mark Japinga4, Nathan Smith5, Brystana G Kaufman6, Hannah L Crook7, David B Muhlestein8, Mark McClellan9.   

Abstract

Care for people living with serious illness is suboptimal for many reasons, including underpayment for key services (such as care coordination and social supports) in fee-for-service reimbursement. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have potential to improve serious illness care because of their widespread dissemination, strong financial incentives for care coordination in downside-risk models, and flexibility in shared savings spending. Through a national survey we found that 94 percent of ACOs at least partially identify their seriously ill beneficiaries, yet only 8-21 percent have widely implemented serious illness initiatives such as advance care planning or home-based palliative care. We selected six diverse ACOs with successful programs for case studies and interviewed fifty-three leaders and front-line personnel. Cross-cutting themes include the need for up-front investment beyond shared savings to build serious illness infrastructure and workforce; supporting the business case for organizational buy-in; how ACO contract specifications affect savings for serious illness populations; and using data and health information technology to manage populations. We discuss the implications of the recent Medicare ACO regulatory overhaul and other policies related to serious illness quality measures, risk adjustment, attribution methods, supporting rural ACOs, and enhancing timely data access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountable Care Organizations; Hospice Care; Serious Illness; palliative care; payment reform

Year:  2019        PMID: 31158012     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  5 in total

1.  Current status and future directions of U.S. genomic nursing health care policy.

Authors:  Emma Kurnat-Thoma; Mei R Fu; Wendy A Henderson; Joachim G Voss; Marilyn J Hammer; Janet K Williams; Kathleen Calzone; Yvette P Conley; Angela Starkweather; Michael T Weaver; S Pamela K Shiao; Bernice Coleman
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Charting a path to high-quality end-of-life care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Ananth; Joanne Wolfe; Emily E Johnston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.921

3.  Frontline provider perceptions of implementing home-based palliative care covered by an insurer.

Authors:  Alexis Coulourides Kogan; Oscar Li; Torrie Fields; Laura Mosqueda; Karl Lorenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.734

4.  Lack of Awareness and Common Misconceptions About Palliative Care Among Adults: Insights from a National Survey.

Authors:  Signe Peterson Flieger; Kenneth Chui; Susan Koch-Weser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Accountable Care Organizations and Spending for Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.

Authors:  Shivani Bakre; John M Hollingsworth; Phyllis L Yan; Emily J Lawton; Richard A Hirth; Vahakn B Shahinian
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 8.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.