Literature DB >> 31157720

Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.

Harold Hyon Soo Kim1, Elina Kari2, Benjamin J Copeland3, Gary F Moore4, Wayne T Shaia5, Maura K Cosetti6, Jack J Wazen7, George B Wanna6, Chin-Yen Joseph Chang8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in the insertion of osseointegrated auditory implants with a newly designed surgical instrumentation set through a punch type technique. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Patients who underwent bone anchored auditory implant surgery using the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (Oticon Medical, Somerset, NJ) surgical set through a punch technique at nine neurotology tertiary referral based practices were identified. Demographic data, skin thickness at implant site, implant used, duration of surgery, adverse intraoperative events, and postoperative outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients comprised the study cohort (32 males, 43 females). Most patients (57. 3%) were aged 51 to 75 years while 30.7% of the cohort comprised those aged 18 to 50 years and 12% were over 75 years. All but two patients received 4 mm fixtured implants and 68% received the Oticon Medical BioHelix implant. Two patients received 3 mm fixture implants and 32% received the Oticon Medical Wide Ponto implant. Mean surgical time was 12.2 minutes (6-45 min, standard deviation of 6.88 min). In three instances, surgery was converted to a linear incision to control brisk bleeding. Skin condition was Holgers 0 to 1 in 91.8%, while 5.5% had Holgers 2, and 2.7% had Holgers 3 at the first postoperative visit. At second postoperative visit, 94.3% had Holgers 0 to 1, 4.3% had Holgers 2, and 1.4% had Holgers 3. All instances of adverse skin reactions were treated with topical or systemic antibiotics and/or local debridement. There were no instances of implant loss. One patient had his implant traumatically displaced to a 45-degree angle necessitating implant replacement at a second site.
CONCLUSION: Punch technique placement of osseointegrated auditory implants using the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery surgical set represents a safe technique that further simplifies a progressively minimally invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31157720     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

1.  Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Helén Lagerkvist; Karin Carvalho; Marcus Holmberg; Ulrika Petersson; Cor Cremers; Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina De Stefano; Paolo Mochi; Alessandra Murri; Domenico Cuda
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Ex vivo Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Robert J Stokroos; Martin L Johansson
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  The Oticon Ponto System in Adults With Severe-to-Profound and Mixed Hearing Loss: Audiologic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Beata Dziendziel; Elzbieta Wlodarczyk; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.619

5.  A Clinical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery With a Modified Drill System for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Coosje Jacoba Isabella Caspers; Ivo Joachim Kruyt; Emmanuel Antonius Maria Mylanus; Myrthe Karianne Sophie Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.311

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.