Literature DB >> 31157579

Cost Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Adult Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

John K Lin1,2, Lori S Muffly3, Michael A Spinner3, James I Barnes1,2, Douglas K Owens1,2, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are approved for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel; each costs $373,000. We evaluated their cost effectiveness.
METHODS: We used a decision analytic Markov model informed by recent multicenter, single-arm trials to evaluate axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel in multiply relapsed/refractory, adult, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from a US health payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Under a range of plausible long-term effectiveness assumptions, each therapy was compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy regimens and stem-cell transplantation. Main outcomes were undiscounted life years, discounted lifetime costs, discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (3% annual discount rate). Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty.
RESULTS: In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 40% 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), axi-cel increased life expectancy by 8.2 years at $129,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $90,000 to $219,000). At a 30% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were more modest (6.4 years) and expensive ($159,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $284,000]). In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 35% 5-year PFS, tisagenlecleucel increased life expectancy by 4.6 years at $168,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $414,000/QALY). At a 25% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were smaller (3.4 years) and more expensive ($223,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $123,000 to $1,170,000/QALY]). Administering CAR-T to all indicated patients would increase US health care costs by approximately $10 billion over 5 years. Price reductions to $250,000 and $200,000, respectively, or payment only for initial complete response (at current prices) would allow axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel to cost less than $150,000/QALY, even at 25% PFS.
CONCLUSION: At 2018 prices, it is possible that both CAR-T therapies meet a less than $150,000/QALY threshold. This depends on long-term outcomes compared with chemoimmunotherapy and stem-cell transplantation, which are uncertain. Widespread adoption would substantially increase non-Hodgkin lymphoma health care costs. Price reductions or payment for initial response would improve cost effectiveness, even with modest long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31157579     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

1.  Cytokine release syndrome and neurological event costs in lisocabtagene maraleucel-treated patients in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial.

Authors:  Jeremy S Abramson; Tanya Siddiqi; Jacob Garcia; Christine Dehner; Yeonhee Kim; Andy Nguyen; Sophie Snyder; November McGarvey; Matthew Gitlin; Corey Pelletier; Monika P Jun
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-03-23

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (pALL) and Adult Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in Switzerland.

Authors:  Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohsen Yaghoubi; Patrick Seitz; Mehdi Javanbakht; Elisabeth Brock
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors.

Authors:  Enli Liu; David Marin; Pinaki Banerjee; Homer A Macapinlac; Philip Thompson; Rafet Basar; Lucila Nassif Kerbauy; Bethany Overman; Peter Thall; Mecit Kaplan; Vandana Nandivada; Indresh Kaur; Ana Nunez Cortes; Kai Cao; May Daher; Chitra Hosing; Evan N Cohen; Partow Kebriaei; Rohtesh Mehta; Sattva Neelapu; Yago Nieto; Michael Wang; William Wierda; Michael Keating; Richard Champlin; Elizabeth J Shpall; Katayoun Rezvani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Decision-analytic modeling as a tool for selecting optimal therapy incorporating hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancy.

Authors:  Shigeo Fuji; Arnon Nagler; Mohamad Mohty; Bipin Savani; Roni Shouval
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in the United States.

Authors:  Salvatore Fiorenza; David S Ritchie; Scott D Ramsey; Cameron J Turtle; Joshua A Roth
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  Taking T-Cell Oncotherapy Off-the-Shelf.

Authors:  Feiyan Mo; Maksim Mamonkin; Malcolm K Brenner; Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 16.687

7.  Cost-effectiveness of azacitidine and venetoclax in unfit patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kishan K Patel; Amer M Zeidan; Rory M Shallis; Thomas Prebet; Nikolai Podoltsev; Scott F Huntington
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

8.  Is autologous transplant in relapsed DLBCL patients achieving only a PET+ PR appropriate in the CAR T-cell era?

Authors:  Nirav N Shah; Kwang W Ahn; Carlos Litovich; Yizeng He; Craig Sauter; Timothy S Fenske; Mehdi Hamadani
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: Optimising the dose.

Authors:  Nathaniel Dasyam; Philip George; Robert Weinkove
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapies.

Authors:  Nathan Singh; Elena Orlando; Jun Xu; Jie Xu; Zev Binder; McKensie A Collins; Donald M O'Rourke; J Joseph Melenhorst
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 15.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.