Literature DB >> 31157304

Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Knockdown Suppresses the Proliferation of HepG2 and Huh7 Cells and Enhances the Cisplatin Effect.

Jiangwei Liu1, Xiaocheng Li1, Jianzhao Huang1, Yan Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the functions of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and assessed the effects of MMP2 on HCC cell sensitivity to cisplatin.
METHODOLOGY: HepG2 and Huh7 cells were cultured. A pre-experiment was performed to explore the optimal transduction conditions of the MMP2-siRNA lentivirus (si-MMP2). Quantitative real-time PCR and western blot assays were performed to measure the expression levels of MMP2 in HepG2 and Huh7 cells. An MTT assay was used to evaluate cell proliferation, and flow cytometry analysis was applied to examine cell apoptosis. A Transwell assay was carried out to assess cell invasion.
RESULTS: The optimal virus:cell ratio was 100 multiplicity of infection (MOI) for both cells, and the optimal transduction times for HepG2 and Huh7 cells were 48 h and 72 h, respectively. MMP2 knockdown significantly decreased the mRNA and protein levels of MMP2 in both cell lines (P<0.01). MMP2 knockdown significantly decreased the proliferation and increased the apoptosis of HepG2 and Huh7 cells (P<0.01). Co-treatment with si-MMP2 and cisplatin significantly increased the sensitivity of HepG2 and Huh7 cells to cisplatin (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: MMP2 may act as an oncogene and may be a potential therapeutic target in HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cisplatin; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2); Proliferation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31157304      PMCID: PMC6534103          DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Med (Wars)


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the main type of liver cancer, accounting for more than half of all liver cancer cases [1, 2]. Currently, the therapeutic options for HCC patients are poor and mainly include surgical resection, liver transplantation, and several antitumour drugs [3, 4, 5]. However, the therapeutic effects are extremely limited. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), consisting of a series of subtypes in humans, are zinc-dependent endopeptidases that are involved in the digestion of the extracellular matrix (ECM) during cell invasion or migration [6, 7]. To date, more than 22 human MMPs and 25 vertebrate homologues have been identified [8]. MMPs are produced as inactive zymogens and are maintained in the inactive form by the interaction between a cysteine in the propeptide domain and a zinc ion in the catalytic domain [7]. Activated MMPs have been demonstrated to be associated with various cell physiological processes, including cell apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, and migration [9, 10]. Therefore, MMP activation is considered to play a critical role in the progression of human cancers. Recently, MMP2 was reported to participate in the tumourigenesis of multiple tumours, such as thyroid cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer [11, 12, 13]. However, whether MMP2 is involved in the tumourigenesis of HCC remains largely unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the underlying functions of MMP2 in HCC cells and to assess the effects of MMP2 on the sensitivity of HCC cells to cisplatin. We first synthesized an effective siRNA against MMP2 (si-MMP2), and two HCC cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7) were transduced with si-MMP2-carrying lentivirus to block MMP2 expression. In subsequent functional assays, we found that the knockdown of MMP2 significantly inhibited cell proliferation and invasion and promoted cell apoptosis, suggesting that MMP2 may act as an oncogene in HCC. In addition, we found that the knockdown of MMP2 in HCC cells enhanced the sensitivity of HepG2 and Huh7 cells to cisplatin, indicating that MMP2 inhibitors may serve as enhancers of antitumour drugs.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture

The HCC cell lines HepG2 and Huh7 were both purchased from the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and maintained in a humidified cell incubator containing 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS).

Experiments on optimal transduction conditions

The optimal transduction concentrations and times were determined using western blot assays. Three parallel experiments were used in each treatment. Gene silencing was performed using a lentivirus-mediated method [14]. The negative control siRNA (non-silencing siRNA with a scrambled sequence; si-con) lenti-virus and the MMP2-siRNA (si-MMP2; target sequence, AGU AGA UCC AGU AUU CAU UCC CUG C [15]) lentivirus were purchased from Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China. Polybrene (Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, US) was used as the transduction enhancer. The lentivirus transduction procedures were performed according to the instructions indicated by the manufacturer (Sangon Biotech, China).

Optimal transduction concentration

HepG2 and Huh7 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 1×105 cells/well. A centrifuge tube (1.5 ml) was used, and serum-free culture medium without antibiotics at 150 μl was added. Afterwards, 15 μl of polybrene was added. The mixtures were applied to the cells to constitute the normal control, polybrene, si-con, 90 multiplicity of infection (MOI; lentivirus-cell ratio), 100 MOI, and 110 MOI groups. After 6 h of transduction, the complex culture medium was replaced with fresh medium. Then, the cells were incubated in 5% CO2 and saturated humidity at 37°C for 72 h.

Optimal transduction time

HepG2 and Huh7 cells were seeded at a density of 1×105 cells/well. Serum-free culture medium without antibiotics at 300 μl was added to a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube. Polybrene (15 μl) was added. si-MMP2 was applied at the optimal concentration. Afterwards, the mixtures were applied to the cells to constitute the normal control, polybrene, 12-h, 24-h, 48-h and 72-h groups according to different transduction times. Other culture conditions were the same as the conditions mentioned above. An si-control group at the same concentration as that of si-MMP2 was also used for the 72-h culture.

Western blot

Total proteins of the treated HCC cells were extracted using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.05% SDS, pH 7.4). After centrifugation by a refrigerated centrifuge (Eppendorf, TGL-18R) at 12,000 rpm/min at 4°C for 15 min, the supernatants were collected, and a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratory, Hercules, CA, USA) was applied to determine the protein concentration. A total of 50 μg of protein was electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% non-fat dried milk at room temperature for 2 h, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against MMP2 (mouse, 1:1,000, Ab86607, Abcam) and actin (mouse, 1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed thrice for 15 min for each wash with Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBS-T; containing 1.65 ml of 20% Tween 20 and 700 ml of TBS). Then, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:3,000; Proteintech; Rosemont, IL, USA) for 45-60 min. After extensive washing, the blots were developed by ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.; Waltham, MA, USA). Chemiluminescence was captured on a UVP BioImaging system (UVP; Cambridge, UK).

MMP2 knockdown experiments

Western blot assays showed that the optimal virus-cell ratio was 100 MOI for both cells and that the optimal transduction time for HepG2 and Huh7 cells was 48 h and 72 h, respectively (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1

si-MMP2 knockdown efficiency. A, The knockdown efficiency according to the relative mRNA expression levels of MMP2 in HepG2 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). B, The knockdown efficiency according to the relative mRNA expression levels of MMP2 in Huh7 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on RT-qPCR. C, The relative protein levels of MMP2 in HepG2 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on western blot assays. D, The relative protein levels of MMP2 in Huh7 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on western blot assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

Figure 2

Effects of MMP2 knockdown on cell proliferation of HepG2 (at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (at 72 h after transduction) using MTT assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

si-MMP2 knockdown efficiency. A, The knockdown efficiency according to the relative mRNA expression levels of MMP2 in HepG2 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). B, The knockdown efficiency according to the relative mRNA expression levels of MMP2 in Huh7 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on RT-qPCR. C, The relative protein levels of MMP2 in HepG2 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on western blot assays. D, The relative protein levels of MMP2 in Huh7 cells in the normal control, polybrene, si-control, and si-MMP2 groups based on western blot assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test. Effects of MMP2 knockdown on cell proliferation of HepG2 (at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (at 72 h after transduction) using MTT assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test. In the following experiments, the obtained optimal transduction conditions were used, with six parallel wells for each group.

Validation of knockdown efficiency

HepG2 and Huh7 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a concentration of 1×105 cells/well and incubated at 37°C overnight. Transduction was performed according to the optimal transduction conditions obtained in this study. The knockdown efficiency was validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blot assays [15].

RT-qPCR

Total RNAs of treated HepG2 and Huh7 cells were prepared using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the protocol from the manufacturer. cDNA was synthesized using a Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo; USA) based on the total RNAs extracted from treated HCC cells. qRT-PCR was conducted on a 7900 HT Fast system (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) with the following protocol: 94°C, 5 min; 40 cycles of amplification (94°C, 30 s and 62°C, 40 s); and then 72°C, 10 min. The sequences of the MMP2 primers were 5’-AGACAGTGGATGATGCCTTTGC-3’ (forward) and 5’-GGAGTC CGTCCTTACCGTCAAA-3’ (reverse), and those of actin were 5’-CATCCTGCGTCTGGACCTGG-3’ (forward) and 5’-TAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC-3’ (reverse). The results were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCt method [16], where ΔCt =ΔCt of the target or that of the reference (actin), and -ΔΔCt= average ΔCt of the control or that of the target. The 2-ΔΔCt method reflects the relative expression of the target gene to that of the control. The procedures were performed as described above.

Cell invasion assay (Transwell assay)

The cell invasive ability of treated HCC cells was determined using Transwell chambers (8-μm pore size; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) with Matrigel coating (BD Biosciences). The upper chamber was filled with 200 μl of treated HepG2 and Huh7 cells (1×105) in serum-free medium, and 500 μl of medium containing 5% FBS was added into the lower chamber. After incubating at 37°C for 24 h, the non-invasive cells were removed, and the invasive cells were fixed and stained using crystal violet. Invasive cell numbers were counted under a microscope (×100). Five visual fields were randomly selected, and the average was obtained.

MTT assays

Cell viability was assessed by MTT assays following the procedures described in the literature [17]. In this study, HepG2 and Huh7 cells were infected according to the optimal transduction conditions obtained in this study. The optimal virus:cell ratios for both cell lines were 100 MOI, and the optimal transduction times for HepG2 and Huh7 cells were 48 and 72 h, respectively. Then, the transduced cells were transferred to a 96-well plate for MTT assays at a density of 2×104 cells/well. After washing three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cells were incubated with 20 μl of MTT solution at 5 mg/ml for 4 h at 37°C in a humidified CO2 incubator. The media were removed, and then 150 μl dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) was added into each well and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 490 nm with a microplate reader (Sunrise™; Tecan Group Ltd., Switzerland).

Apoptosis analysis

The cell apoptosis rate of HCC cells infected with si-MMP2 lentivirus was determined by Annexin-V/PI double staining followed by flow cytometry analysis [18]. Briefly, treated HepG2 and Huh7 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a concentration of 2×104 cells/well and maintained overnight at 37°C. After washing with cold PBS, HepG2 and Huh7 cells were resuspended in 500 μl binding buffer containing 5 μl PI and 5 μl FITC-labelled Annexin-V and incubated for 10 min in the dark. Subsequently, apoptotic HepG2 and Huh7 cells were analysed with a FACScan flow cytometer and Kaluza analysis software (Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA).

Cisplatin cytotoxicity assays

HepG2 and Huh7 cells were infected according to the optimal transduction conditions and were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 2×104 cells/well. Cisplatin was added into each well, and the final concentration of cisplatin was 50 μg/ml. The incubation with cisplatin was conducted following a procedure described in the literature [19]. At 24 h after incubation, MTT assays were used to examine the cell viability of HCC cells, and the procedures were performed as described previously.

Statistical analysis

All the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and processed with SPSS 24.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, USA). The normality of the data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov method, and the homogeneity of variance was determined using Levene’s test. One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test was performed for comparisons between groups. P<0.05 and P<0.01 were considered significant and very significant, respectively.

Results

Knockdown efficiency of si-MMP2

The knockdown efficiency of si-MMP2 was evaluated using RT-qPCR and western blot assays. No significant differences in the mRNA expression of MMP2 were observed among the control, polybrene, and si-con groups in both cell lines (P>0.05); however, compared with that in any other group in the same cell line, the MMP2 mRNA expression in the si-MMP2 group was significantly downregulated, indicating a significantly increased MMP2 knockdown efficiency (P<0.01; Figure 1A and 1B). Western blot assays showed consistent outcomes with those based on RT-qPCR experiments (Figure 1C and 1D).

MMP2 knockdown decreased cellular proliferation and increased cellular apoptosis

To investigate the biological functions of MMP2 in HCC, we blocked MMP2 expression in HepG2 and Huh7 cells by si-MMP2, and cell proliferation and apoptosis were then assessed using MTT assays and flow cytometry analysis, respectively. Optical density (OD) values from the MTT assays indicate that, compared with that of the normal control cells, the proliferation of HepG2 and Huh7 cells infected with si-MMP2 lentivirus was significantly inhibited; however, the proliferation of cells from the remaining three groups did not significantly differ from that of the normal control cells (Figure 2). Annexin V/PI double staining and flow cytometry analysis were performed to further evaluate the apoptosis of HepG2 and Huh7 cells after MMP2 knockdown (Figure 3). In both cell lines, no significant differences in the apoptotic rate were observed among the control, polybrene, and si-con groups in both cell lines (P>0.05). However, compared with that in any other group from the same cell line, apoptosis in the si-MMP2 group significantly increased (P<0.01).
Figure 3

The apoptotic rates of HepG2 (A; at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (B; at 72 h after transduction) using flow cytometry. The numbers in the graphs are the counts of the cells detected with flow cytometry (UL, necrotic cells; LL, non-apoptotic cells; LR, cells at the early apoptotic stage; and UR, cells at the late apoptotic stage). The apoptotic rate = the apoptotic rate at the early stage (LR) + that at the late stage (UR). **P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

The apoptotic rates of HepG2 (A; at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (B; at 72 h after transduction) using flow cytometry. The numbers in the graphs are the counts of the cells detected with flow cytometry (UL, necrotic cells; LL, non-apoptotic cells; LR, cells at the early apoptotic stage; and UR, cells at the late apoptotic stage). The apoptotic rate = the apoptotic rate at the early stage (LR) + that at the late stage (UR). **P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

MMP2 knockdown inhibited the cell invasive capacity of HCC cells

To further determine whether MMP2 was involved in the invasion of HCC cells, Transwell assays were performed (Table 1; Supplementary Figure 3). The invasive cell counts of the control, polybrene, and si-con groups were comparable to that reported in the literature [20]. In both cell lines, no significant differences in the number of invasive cells were observed among the NC, polybrene, and si-con groups (P>0.05). However, compared with that in any other group from the same cell line, the number of invasive cells in the si-MMP2 group significantly decreased (P<0.01).
Table 1

Invasive cell counts of HepG2 and Huh7 cells after lentivirus-mediated transduction (at 48 h and 72 h, respectively) based on Transwell assays.

HepG2Huh7
Normal control276±15136±22
Polybrene213±11139±9
si-con231±24145±21
si-MMP2126±15**76±8**

** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

Invasive cell counts of HepG2 and Huh7 cells after lentivirus-mediated transduction (at 48 h and 72 h, respectively) based on Transwell assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

MMP2 knockdown increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to cisplatin

HCC cells were treated with si-MMP2 and cisplatin (50 μg/ml), and an MTT assay was then performed to assess cell viability (Figure 4). No significant differences in the OD values were observed among the NC+cisplatin, polybrene+cisplatin, and si-con+cisplatin groups in both cell lines (P>0.05). However, compared with that in any other group from the same cell line, the OD value in the si-MMP2+cisplatin group significantly decreased (P<0.01).
Figure 4

Effects of MMP2 knockdown on the sensitivity HepG2 (at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (at 72 h after transduction) to cisplatin using MTT assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

Effects of MMP2 knockdown on the sensitivity HepG2 (at 48 h after transduction) and Huh7 cells (at 72 h after transduction) to cisplatin using MTT assays. ** P<0.01 vs. the normal control group, according to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that knockdown of MMP2 in HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines by infecting cells with si-MMP2 lentivirus strongly inhibited cell proliferation and invasion and significantly promoted cell proliferation. The process of invasion and migration of tumour cells requires degradation of the ECM and basement membrane, and MMPs that are expressed by almost all tumour cells perform this proteolytic process [21, 22, 23]. According to their exact functions and distributions in cells, MMPs can be divided into multiple subtypes. MMP2 is an important member of the MMP family that was found to be overexpressed in multiple human tumours, including HCC [24, 25]. Liu et al. [26] demonstrated that downregulation of MMP2 and MMP9 was induced by the main components of pomegranate, ellagic acid and luteolin, and suppressed the metastasis of ovarian cancer. Downregulation of MMP2 and MMP9 induced by TRIM31 knockdown was shown to suppress the proliferation and invasion of gallbladder cancer [27]. In addition, Fang et al. [28] reported that downregulation of MMP2 induced by microRNA-29b overexpression significantly inhibited tumour angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis of HCC. Our results were consistent with previously reported results [28]. Given the complexity of the pathogenesis of HCC, the current therapeutic options for HCC mainly include surgical resection, liver transplantation, and chemotherapy with several antitumour drugs, such as cisplatin, sorafenib, and brivanib [29, 30]. Currently, cisplatin remains the first-line chemotherapeutic agent for HCC [31]. In this study, cisplatin was applied to HCC cells after MMP2 knockdown. The results showed that, compared with those of the other groups, the OD values of the MMP2 knockdown groups were substantially decreased, suggesting that MMP2 knockdown may have a synergistic reaction with cisplatin in inhibiting the proliferation of HCC cells. Recently, an inhibitor of MMP2 was shown to enhance the sensitivity of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin [32]. In addition, Li et al. reported that genistein could reinforce the inhibitory effects of cisplatin on HCC by downregulating MMP2 expression [33]. Our results are consistent with those previously reported, suggesting that MMP2 may serve as a target in the treatment of HCC in clinical practice. This study has limitations. This study was conducted in vitro, and therefore, microenvironmental changes in vivo may alter the results. Furthermore, in this study, two HCC cell lines were employed. To further validate the roles of MMP2 in the proliferation and invasion of HCC cells, more cell lines and in vivo studies should be involved in future studies. In conclusion, MMP2 knockdown inhibits the progression of HepG2 and Huh7 cells and enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin to these cells, suggesting that MMP2 may act as a therapeutic target for HCC patients.
  32 in total

Review 1.  How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior.

Authors:  M D Sternlicht; Z Werb
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 2.  New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression.

Authors:  Mikala Egeblad; Zena Werb
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Combination treatment with comprehensive cryoablation and immunotherapy in metastatic hepatocellular cancer.

Authors:  Li-Zhi Niu; Jia-Liang Li; Jian-Ying Zeng; Feng Mu; Meng-Tian Liao; Fei Yao; Li Li; Chun-Yan Liu; Ji-Bing Chen; Jian-Sheng Zuo; Ke-Cheng Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in cultured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and surgically resected HCC tissues.

Authors:  Sachiko Ogasawara; Hirohisa Yano; Seiya Momosaki; Naoyo Nishida; Yumi Takemoto; Sakiko Kojiro; Masamichi Kojiro
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Clinical role of MMP-2/TIMP-2 imbalance in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gianluigi Giannelli; Carlo Bergamini; Felice Marinosci; Emilia Fransvea; Michele Quaranta; Luigi Lupo; Oronzo Schiraldi; Salvatore Antonaci
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Genistein reinforces the inhibitory effect of Cisplatin on liver cancer recurrence and metastasis after curative hepatectomy.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Ming-Dao Hu; Xiao-Fan Deng; Bo Li
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

7.  Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 induces lung alveolar epithelial cell migration and proliferation, protects from apoptosis, and represses mitochondrial oxygen consumption.

Authors:  Iliana Herrera; José Cisneros; Mariel Maldonado; Remedios Ramírez; Blanca Ortiz-Quintero; Elena Anso; Navdeep S Chandel; Moisés Selman; Annie Pardo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  MicroRNA-29b suppresses tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis by regulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression.

Authors:  Jian-Hong Fang; Hui-Chao Zhou; Chunxian Zeng; Jine Yang; Yinglin Liu; Xiuzhi Huang; Jing-Ping Zhang; Xin-Yuan Guan; Shi-Mei Zhuang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Epilysin, a novel human matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-28) expressed in testis and keratinocytes and in response to injury.

Authors:  J Lohi; C L Wilson; J D Roby; W C Parks
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Pre-Treatment of platinum resistant ovarian cancer cells with an MMP-9/MMP-2 inhibitor prior to cisplatin enhances cytotoxicity as determined by high content screening.

Authors:  Alexandros Laios; Bashir M Mohamed; Lynn Kelly; Richard Flavin; Stephen Finn; Lynda McEvoy; Michael Gallagher; Cara Martin; Orla Sheils; Martina Ring; Anthony Davies; Margaret Lawson; Noreen Gleeson; Tom D'Arcy; Charles d'Adhemar; Lucy Norris; Ream Langhe; Feras Abu Saadeh; John J O'Leary; Sharon A O'Toole
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Effect of Atractylodes macrocephala polysaccharide on proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro].

Authors:  Yun Zhu; Cheng Li; Xinsheng Lin; Jingjing Sun; Yang Cheng
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-10-30

2.  Enhancing the Anticancer Potential of Targeting Tumor-Associated Metalloenzymes via VEGFR Inhibition by New Triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidinone Acyclo C-Nucleosides Multitarget Agents.

Authors:  Mohamed Nabil Abd Al Moaty; El Sayed Helmy El Ashry; Laila Fathy Awad; Nihal Ahmed Ibrahim; Marwa Muhammad Abu-Serie; Assem Barakat; Mezna Saleh Altowyan; Mohamed Teleb
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Systematically Exploring the Antitumor Mechanisms of Core Chinese Herbs on Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Zhulin Wu; Li He; Lianan Wang; Lisheng Peng
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Exploring the active mechanism of berberine against HCC by systematic pharmacology and experimental validation.

Authors:  Lei Song; Yi Luo; Xinyue Wang; Mohammed M Almutairi; Huafeng Pan; Weirong Li; Yongqiang Liu; Qi Wang; Ming Hong
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Onconase Restores Cytotoxicity in Dabrafenib-Resistant A375 Human Melanoma Cells and Affects Cell Migration, Invasion and Colony Formation Capability.

Authors:  Alice Raineri; Sabrina Fasoli; Rachele Campagnari; Giovanni Gotte; Marta Menegazzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Bioinformatics and Molecular Insights to Anti-Metastasis Activity of Triethylene Glycol Derivatives.

Authors:  Vidhi Malik; Sukant Garg; Sajal Afzal; Jaspreet Kaur Dhanjal; Chae-Ok Yun; Sunil C Kaul; Durai Sundar; Renu Wadhwa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.