| Literature DB >> 31157173 |
Shengqiang Wang1, Zhu Yang1, Tingfu Zhang1, Na Li2, Qianwen Cao1, Guoqi Li1, Yongze Yuan1, Deli Liu1.
Abstract
Penicillium sp. are damaging to a range of foods and fruits including citrus. To date, double-stranded (ds)RNA viruses have been reported in most Penicillium species but not in citrus pathogen P. crustosum. Here we report a novel dsRNA virus, designated as Penicillium crustosum chrysovirus 1 (PcCV1) and isolated from P. crustosum strain HS-CQ15. PcCV1 genome comprises four dsRNA segments, referred to as dsRNA1, dsRNA2, dsRNA3, and dsRNA4, which are 3600, 3177, 3078, and 2808 bp in length, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of four open reading frames (ORFs) in the PcCV1 genome. ORF1 in dsRNA1 encodes a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and ORF2 in dsRNA2 encodes a putative coat protein (CP). The two remaining ORFs, ORF3 in dsRNA3 and ORF4 in dsRNA4, encode proteins of unknown function. Phylogenetic analysis based on RdRp sequences showed that PcCV1 clusters with other members of the genus Chrysovirus, family Chrysoviridae. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis revealed that the PcCV1 visions are approximately 40 nm in diameter. Regarding biological effects of PcCV1, HS-CQ15 harboring the chrysovirus exhibited no obvious difference in colony morphology under fungicide-free conditions but decreased resistance to demethylation inhibitor (DMI)-fungicide prochloraz, as compared to PcCV1-cured strain. Here we provide the first evidence of a virus present in citrus pathogenic fungus P. crustosum and the chrysovirus-induced change in fungicide-resistance of its host fungus.Entities:
Keywords: Penicillium crustosum; chrysovirus; citrus; molecular characterization; pathogen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31157173 PMCID: PMC6529537 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Characterization of PcCV1 genomic organization and phylogenetic analysis. (A) Mobility pattern analysis of PcCV1 dsRNAs from P. crustosum HS-CQ15 mycelia (lane 1) by agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane M indicates DNA marker DS10000 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). (B) Northern-blot confirmation of PcCV1 genomic dsRNAs. The left panel is the copy of (A), indicating in-gel positions for dsRNA1 to 4 separated as mentioned above. The full-scan of entire original gels for the RNA blots of PcCV1 genomic dsRNAs is shown in Figure S3. (C) Schematic representation of PcCV1 genome organization. The boxes represent the ORFs within genomic dsRNAs, and lines depict 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs). (D) Multiple alignments of RdRps between PcCV1 and other chrysoviriuses. The conserved motifs in the selected RdRp sequences are boxed with numbers 1–8. The names (full and abbreviated) of selected chrysoviriuses as well as GenBank accession numbers of their RdRps are listed in Table S2. (E) Nucleotide sequence alignments of 5′- and 3′-UTRs of PcCV1 genomic dsRNAs. The identical nucleotides among dsRNA1 to 4 are especially color-shaded. The “box 1” is highlighted in black box, and the “CAA” repeats are highlighted with underlines. (F) Phylogenetic analysis of the RdRp sequences for PdGV1. The names (full and abbreviated) of selected chrysoviriuses as well as GenBank accession numbers of their RdRps are listed in Table S2.
Figure 2Biological effects of PcCV1-infection on its host fungus. (A) Effect of PcCV1-infection on vegetative growth of HS-CQ15. (B) Effect of PcCV1-infection on prochloraz (DMI-fungicide) resistance of HS-CQ15. The fungal strains were grown on PDA at 25°C for 7 d and photographed, with or without 5.0 mg L−1 prochloraz (final concentration). In panel (A,B), the three plates listed in horizontal line indicate three biological replicates. (C) Comparison of colony diameters for HS-CQ15 (PiCV1-infected) and its PiCV1-cured progenies under fungicide-free conditions. (D) Comparison of EC50 values against prochloraz for HS-CQ15 (PiCV1-infected) and its PiCV1-cured progenies. In panel (C,D), the values are shown as mean ± SD from five independent experiments (n = 5) with three biological replicates for each experiment, and SPSS software (version 10.0) was applied to perform statistics analysis (**P < 0.01).